It’s not as good as it sounds. They don’t have CCS, they have j1772 which is ac only, and the NACS port only supports DC charging. It’ll probably end up confusing a lot of users, especially if they try to use a Tesla destination charger. NACS is the way to go going forward, and there are several good adapters to use CCS or J1772, so I don’t think we need an extra port that will gradually become obsolete.Apparently the new Nissan leaf will come with both ports (NACS, CCS). Please consider doing the same for scout!
Probably CHAdeMo.Yeah, so what’s the Laserdisc of charging? What’s for people who were early adopters of the Criterion collection?
Oh don’t get me started. We early adopted all that electronic stuff.Probably CHAdeMo.
Huh, that tracks! A couple of European electrics, similarly few Americans, and a number of Asian cars who will possibly be last to drop the standard?Probably CHAdeMo.
Someone else chose Laserdisc?!?!Oh don’t get me started. We early adopted all that electronic stuff.
Laserdisc, Minidisk, DAT, HDDVD. We even had one of the first wide screen tube TVs that somehow the orientation of the picture was affected by electromagnetic fields or something and it would be just slightly off kilter and it had an a and a b switch you had to change to try and get the picture straight.![]()
Yup, and it was in some ways technically ahead of its time (supported v2x) but was clunky and not too pretty.Huh, that tracks! A couple of European electrics, similarly few Americans, and a number of Asian cars who will possibly be last to drop the standard?![]()
You mean Whole Paycheck.Someone else chose Laserdisc?!?!My parents were masters of choosing technologies that were not adopted, politicians that did not get elected, products that got discontinued, etc. I do slightly better. I am fond of falling in love with foods that get discontinued. RIP Just Mayo, Forever In Our Hearts. I know it’s still around, but only in tiny jars and it only seems to be at Whole Foods. Eff Whole Foods.
Also, Scouts will have charging ports. Now it’s on topic.
Aside from more and more chargers moving to NACS by the time Scout is released, I'm sure the cost of having two charging ports with different charging options if passed onto us as the buyer would be more than if we just bought CCS adapters if needed. I don't think many people will by 2027 and beyond anyways.Apparently the new Nissan leaf will come with both ports (NACS, CCS). Please consider doing the same for scout!
I agree. It’s one thing to have to charge ports so you can back in or pull head in but to have two that are different connections seems like overkill. Only takes a few seconds (I presume) to click on an adapter.Aside from more and more chargers moving to NACS by the time Scout is released, I'm sure the cost of having two charging ports with different charging options if passed onto us as the buyer would be more than if we just bought CCS adapters if needed. I don't think many people will by 2027 and beyond anyways.
No, please don't. It's a terrible idea. NACS is the one port to rule them all. Every vehicle should be NACS, it's the most elegant connector and solves for both AC and DC charging. No need to introduce complexity and confusion by having two different ports.Apparently the new Nissan leaf will come with both ports (NACS, CCS). Please consider doing the same for scout!
Yes. I have adapters for J1772, CCS, and for a whole host of RV post and dryer plugs, lol. The trick is to not leave your adapter attached to the charger.I agree. It’s one thing to have to charge ports so you can back in or pull head in but to have two that are different connections seems like overkill. Only takes a few seconds (I presume) to click on an adapter.
Can’t block a parking lot with a trailer, lol. There’s going to be a lot of circumstances where trailer will need to be dropped to charge. Very few pull through chargers around.I wouldn’t be opposed to NAC and CCS1 since they’re both the same communications protocol, and wouldn’t be much of an EE engineering challenge, but it’s really unnecessary and would add unnecessary expense to the vehicle. An adapter is cheaper.
I agree that the plugs should be on the front right of the vehicle. It makes zero sense to put the ports on the back of a tow-capable vehicle.