With reasonable driving (not accelerating or braking too hard and cruising at speed limits or occasionally going about 5 under) in my Bolt I can get 310 from 80%. EPA was 246 from 100%I will probably be convinced with 350 miles in the Terra.
With reasonable driving (not accelerating or braking too hard and cruising at speed limits or occasionally going about 5 under) in my Bolt I can get 310 from 80%. EPA was 246 from 100%I will probably be convinced with 350 miles in the Terra.
Exactlywell its a free market for a reason. We're not China! If we were we would probably have the EV build out like China.
Im sure for some its the area they live. But Maybe, its a personal preference of not wanting to wait to charge. Its similar to Fords ecoboosts and V8s options in certain Trucks. Its all personal preference.
Key: Bold to Bold
Norm to Norm.
I think Scout should have marketed the BEV better to make it more competitive. But It looks like the market has spoken to what they want.
Its also pretty clear that its personal preference considering its right in your face when you go to reserve, Full Electric or EREV. Im sure most EREV reservation holders don't even understand what an EREV is. They probably think its a normal Hybrid with a gas engine driving the rear wheels.
Yeah. GM just settled a federal/state lawsuit for selling vehicle data (location, behaviors) to brokers so they are off my list for… a while.I would say to watch GM, if they make a Tahoe\Yukon EV they might hit those ranges
I don't think they did a good job marketing in total for both side now looking at it. Im seeing people on the inter-webs commenting that they wish it had a hybrid option. I think EREV was too complicated to show to the general public.Exactly
Fair thought, but it also depends on how long those stops are, if you're "full" charging at both, then it might be on the expensive side, but if you're just charging enough to get to the next one it might not be, not to mention uncontrollable environmental factors like weather and trafficDecided long ago that 350 mile range was my cutoff. 450 would make me a LOT more comfortable. Not so much that I need 450 mile range, but I really want 350 miles of range, and don't want light towing (lawn mower or kayak trailer) or actual AT tires to put me much below that 350 miles. As it is, a 240 mile trip to paddle or mow might be pushing it - and honestly, I might want to take a nap with the AC before I drive home...
Hell, caught myself boat shopping again - as my bay boat will be a really hard tow with the Traveler. Not due to weight - but range. It might only be possible with 2 charges stops. 2 charge stops vs strait drive with my F250... How often would I take the Traveler. Not to mention if I need 2 charge stops - depending on the $/watt, it might not even be less expensive.
You mentioned bay boat. Are you east coast?Decided long ago that 350 mile range was my cutoff. 450 would make me a LOT more comfortable. Not so much that I need 450 mile range, but I really want 350 miles of range, and don't want light towing (lawn mower or kayak trailer) or actual AT tires to put me much below that 350 miles. As it is, a 240 mile trip to paddle or mow might be pushing it - and honestly, I might want to take a nap with the AC before I drive home...
Hell, caught myself boat shopping again - as my bay boat will be a really hard tow with the Traveler. Not due to weight - but range. It might only be possible with 2 charges stops. 2 charge stops vs strait drive with my F250... How often would I take the Traveler. Not to mention if I need 2 charge stops - depending on the $/watt, it might not even be less expensive.
Welcome to the community! Just curious, are you switching your reservation to the BEV or getting something different all together?I was initially excited about the Harvester for the added range. The reason I'm no longer considering it is because it's not just a range extender; it has a smaller EV range of 150mi compared to the EV-only 350mi. With my goal of getting away from gas completely, that's no longer a fail-safe for longer trips, it keeps gas as part of my daily, and that's a no-go for me.
Reserved a BEV Traveler earlier this week. No switching, I hadn't made any reservations previously.Welcome to the community! Just curious, are you switching your reservation to the BEV or getting something different all together?
Wonderful, welcome to the community!Reserved a BEV Traveler earlier this week. No switching, I hadn't made any reservations previously.
I feel you, while I hoped the the EREV was an additional 150 I was expecting 250 each, but my daily miles get 130-230 miles a day and while 500 miles would be great for occasional trips, like driving my scout home from the factory, or to visit friends in SC a couple of drives a year just isn’t worth the extra complexity, maintenance, and costs added near dailyI was initially excited about the Harvester for the added range. The reason I'm no longer considering it is because it's not just a range extender; it has a smaller EV range of 150mi compared to the EV-only 350mi. With my goal of getting away from gas completely, that's no longer a fail-safe for longer trips, it keeps gas as part of my daily, and that's a no-go for me.
Welcome to the forum and thanks for posting. Glad to see more converts to BEVI was initially excited about the Harvester for the added range. The reason I'm no longer considering it is because it's not just a range extender; it has a smaller EV range of 150mi compared to the EV-only 350mi. With my goal of getting away from gas completely, that's no longer a fail-safe for longer trips, it keeps gas as part of my daily, and that's a no-go for me.
I’m pretty much there as well. Still have one of each Traveler reserved as second family member may also want one but if only way to get launch is EREV I may do that as I’ve realized I could get by with nearly no gas. @Jamie@ScoutMotors will you have to use gas at all if you don’t ever do more than 150 miles? Or would one gallon do it and let the auto start burn it off periodically?I feel you, while I hoped the the EREV was an additional 150 I was expecting 250 each, but my daily miles get 130-230 miles a day and while 500 miles would be great for occasional trips, like driving my scout home from the factory, or to visit friends in SC a couple of drives a year just isn’t worth the extra complexity, maintenance, and costs added near daily
Welcome to the Scout Community!I was initially excited about the Harvester for the added range. The reason I'm no longer considering it is because it's not just a range extender; it has a smaller EV range of 150mi compared to the EV-only 350mi. With my goal of getting away from gas completely, that's no longer a fail-safe for longer trips, it keeps gas as part of my daily, and that's a no-go for me.
Though Scout is in a good position to help educate people about actual EV ownership, it's really feeling like they won't and just talk around the EV (given most interviews to date), hopefully Scout will offer a decent incentive for those with Harvester to trade for BEV if they find Range Anxiety is overblown and they end up rarely (if ever) using the generatorWelcome to the Scout Community!
Solid reasoning there. For those with good charging infrastructure in your area, it's hard to make the case for Harvester. However, I still think Scout was smart to offer the Harvester for those who live in areas with chargjng deserts or those with range anxiety to help get them more comfortable with an EV.
Like @cyure always says, I hope everyone gets what they want.