Shopping for a “new” BEV while waiting for the Scout Traveler BEV.

  • From all of us at Scout Motors, welcome to the Scout Community! We created this community to provide Scout vehicle owners, enthusiasts, and curiosity seekers with a place to engage in discussion, suggestions, stories, and connections. Supportive communities are sometimes hard to find, but we're determined to turn this into one.

    Additionally, Scout Motors wants to hear your feedback and speak directly to the rabid community of owners as unique as America. We'll use the Scout Community to deliver news and information on events and launch updates directly to the group. Although the start of production is anticipated in 2026, many new developments and milestones will occur in the interim. We plan to share them with you on this site and look for your feedback and suggestions.

    How will the Scout Community be run? Think of it this way: this place is your favorite local hangout. We want you to enjoy the atmosphere, talk to people who share similar interests, request and receive advice, and generally have an enjoyable time. The Scout Community should be a highlight of your day. We want you to tell stories, share photos, spread your knowledge, and tell us how Scout can deliver great products and experiences. Along the way, Scout Motors will share our journey to production with you.

    Scout is all about respect. We respect our heritage. We respect the land and outdoors. We respect each other. Every person should feel safe, included, and welcomed in the Scout Community. Being kind and courteous to the other forum members is non-negotiable. Friendly debates are welcomed and often produce great outcomes, but we don't want things to get too rowdy. Please take a moment to consider what you post, especially if you think it may insult others. We'll do our best to encourage friendly discourse and to keep the discussions flowing.

    So, welcome to the Scout Community! We encourage you to check back regularly as we plan to engage our members, share teasers, and participate in discussions. The world needs Scouts™. Let's get going.


    We are Scout Motors.
You misunderstand. I would never advocate for someone to not wear their seatbelt. That is not a plug, it is an extender. You still wear your seatbelt. It is meant for people that need extra length for the seatbelt to fit. We used them in the rear seat of my wife's Model S when the kids switched to booster seats. The Model S seatbelt receptacles were down in the seat and the kids could not buckle on their own. With the extender it was no problem.
I know what it’s intended for, as did he but he decided that was more convenient than wearing a seat belt. He was a different kind of person
 
  • Like
Reactions: maynard
No, the problem, as I’ve pointed out repeatedly, is that without a button you’re at the mercy of someone’s algorithm. There’s absolutely no reason not to have a button, and lots of reasons to have one. An algorithm can never read my mind to know when I want it on or off.
I've grown tired of the constant prosyletizing from the anti-buttoners. It doesn't seem worth engaging. They don't seem to care to learn about why the buttons are useful to people who use their vehicles differently from them.

Regardless, I believe I may have found a solution to GM's mistake of removing the Start/Stop button. I may be able to install the equivalent of that button back in the vehicle. It may cost me a few hundred dollars, but it'll be worth it.

Other than that one issue, the vehicle is performing quite well. We're definitely happier with it than we would have been with any other option available today; other than the Lightning, the Silverado so far (after ~500 miles of driving) is far superior for our use than any other truck on the market.
 
From what I'm hearing, sounds like the GM SW stack needs some serious work.
Not really. My experience with the sw stack so far is far superior to any other truck on the market. I hated Rivian's software. Ford's was slow, though functional. Chevrolet is simply suffering from a mistake in interface design by having removed the Start/Stop button.
 
Oh that’s good to know. Admittedly I gave up on it awhile ago and haven’t looked at it recently. Also, @SpaceEVDriver if your job ever has a take-a-forum-buddy-to-work-day-so-they-can-drive-a-mars-rover (or something) let me know lol…
If you need a reason to be in Pasadena on 10 or 11 October, here it is:

JPL is restarting its open house. You’ll need free tickets. They become available on 29 August at 09:00 in California. They’ll be fully booked within a few minutes.

 
If you need a reason to be in Pasadena on 10 or 11 October, here it is:

JPL is restarting its open house. You’ll need free tickets. They become available on 29 August at 09:00 in California. They’ll be fully booked within a few minutes.

Ooh, thanks for the heads up! I live about 25 miles from Pasadena and have the ticket date in my calendar now. Can’t wait!
 
I’m jealous!
I got to visit the JPL site in Santa Clara with a work colleague…
They told me it was an old airship hangar!
It was pretty large!
Oh yes, that must have been at Moffett Field, I used to live near that hangar 20 years ago. Went there once during an airshow. To say it was cavernous would be like saying Ton 618 is a large black hole 😆
 
Oh yes, that must have been at Moffett Field, I used to live near that hangar 20 years ago. Went there once during an airshow. To say it was cavernous would be like saying Ton 618 is a large black hole 😆

I lived just down the road/across the road from Moffet Field for a few years. Close enough that I could hear the wind tunnel spin up at night when I had the windows open, and I rode past it on my bike when I commuted to work, or when I did workout rides on the MUT nearby.

I had a work colleague who used to work at Moffet, and still had friends there. He gave my wife and I a tour of the facility, and we got to walk through the wind tunnel. And by "walk through" I mean, we got to walk through the turbine blades. They're around 4.5-5ft tall each IIRC, and the wind tunnel drew something like 6MW of power at full tilt.

I can't find our photo right now, but it was these ones.

1781768171065.png
 
I lived just down the road/across the road from Moffet Field for a few years. Close enough that I could hear the wind tunnel spin up at night when I had the windows open, and I rode past it on my bike when I commuted to work, or when I did workout rides on the MUT nearby.

I had a work colleague who used to work at Moffet, and still had friends there. He gave my wife and I a tour of the facility, and we got to walk through the wind tunnel. And by "walk through" I mean, we got to walk through the turbine blades. They're around 4.5-5ft tall each IIRC, and the wind tunnel drew something like 6MW of power at full tilt.

I can't find our photo right now, but it was these ones.

View attachment 16475
Now that’s a woodworkers dust collector!
 
I was asked to post about my shopping plans while we wait for the Traveler BEV.

Every 5 years or so we start looking at what our next vehicle might be. We don’t necessarily replace what we have, but we do start shopping. The Traveler BEV is likely to be our next long-term owned vehicle. But in the interim, we’ve found a couple of things we are starting to dislike about the Mustang Mach-E, which we’ve had for going on 4.5 years now.

First, we love almost everything about the Mustang. It’s been a great vehicle for us. It was, by far, the best vehicle we’d ever owned until we got the Lightning. But it has two issues that we keep coming back to…no, that’s not right. WE have two issues with the vehicle that we keep coming back to: First, its clearance is 5.7 inches. We live on an unmaintained gravel road in a place that gets about 100 inches of snow on a normal year and it usually comes in three to five large dumps rather than being spread out over time; that means the Mustang sometimes can’t get out. We don’t like that. Second, its ride is sports-car tuned and not SUV tuned. That’s starting to bother us more than it did originally.

We would also like to get back into mild off-roading. We’re not interested in rock crawling. We did enough of that when we were younger. But we’d like to be able to take our next vehicle off-road when we feel like it. The Lightning is fine on Forest Service roads, but we’re looking at the next level more rugged as our paths in the future.

We have some desires that border on requirements or requirements that border on desires. Whatever. I’ll post the specs in the next comment so this one isn’t any longer.
View attachment 15579
Nice color. Maybe consider a 1994+ Land Cruiser. We have a 91 and love it but it has the lower powered 3FE in it, but super reliable and have 266,000 miles. Easy to maintain, great 4WD even in stock form. Center diff and plenty of clearance without a lift.
 
Nice color. Maybe consider a 1994+ Land Cruiser. We have a 91 and love it but it has the lower powered 3FE in it, but super reliable and have 266,000 miles. Easy to maintain, great 4WD even in stock form. Center diff and plenty of clearance without a lift.
If only it didn’t run on ICE
 
Nice color. Maybe consider a 1994+ Land Cruiser. We have a 91 and love it but it has the lower powered 3FE in it, but super reliable and have 266,000 miles. Easy to maintain, great 4WD even in stock form. Center diff and plenty of clearance without a lift.
I have less than no interest in an internal combustion engine. I grew up building them; I spent almost 50 years getting greasy, usually out of necessity, sometimes for pay, often for “fun." If someone offered to pay me to take and maintain a vehicle with an ICE, I’d have to have a strong reason not to turn it down unless I was allowed to convert to electric. There’s zero benefit to me to driving a gassy vehicle. They’re not even fun to work on anymore; there’s nothing interesting or exciting about them; there’s nothing new for me to learn.


My family had a 1960s Toyota FJ40 with the 2F engine. It was didn’t last very long at our ranch, for various reasons.
I had a 1989 Toyota Pickup with the 22RE engine. It was bullet proof.
I had a 2007 Toyota Tacoma with the 1GR-FE engine. It was bullet proof.
I had a 2019 Toyota Tacoma with the 2GR-FKS engine. Its transmission was crap and the engine was so underpowered it couldn’t pull a rabbit out of a wet paper bag without approaching the red line. It was great at hauling and off-road adventures, but it couldn’t do 30% of the work I needed it to do. I replaced it with a Lightning and it was the first time I was happy to get rid of a Toyota pickup.

Once I was done with gas vehicles, I kept hoping Toyota would offer an electric Tacoma. But they kept failing to do so, so I gave up on waiting. I would still prefer to drive a Tacoma-sized pickup rather than an F-150-sized truck. But until someone offers a capable electric midsized pickup, I’m stuck with the Silverado.
 
I have less than no interest in an internal combustion engine. I grew up building them; I spent almost 50 years getting greasy, usually out of necessity, sometimes for pay, often for “fun." If someone offered to pay me to take and maintain a vehicle with an ICE, I’d have to have a strong reason not to turn it down unless I was allowed to convert to electric. There’s zero benefit to me to driving a gassy vehicle. They’re not even fun to work on anymore; there’s nothing interesting or exciting about them; there’s nothing new for me to learn.


My family had a 1960s Toyota FJ40 with the 2F engine. It was didn’t last very long at our ranch, for various reasons.
I had a 1989 Toyota Pickup with the 22RE engine. It was bullet proof.
I had a 2007 Toyota Tacoma with the 1GR-FE engine. It was bullet proof.
I had a 2019 Toyota Tacoma with the 2GR-FKS engine. Its transmission was crap and the engine was so underpowered it couldn’t pull a rabbit out of a wet paper bag without approaching the red line. It was great at hauling and off-road adventures, but it couldn’t do 30% of the work I needed it to do. I replaced it with a Lightning and it was the first time I was happy to get rid of a Toyota pickup.

Once I was done with gas vehicles, I kept hoping Toyota would offer an electric Tacoma. But they kept failing to do so, so I gave up on waiting. I would still prefer to drive a Tacoma-sized pickup rather than an F-150-sized truck. But until someone offers a capable electric midsized pickup, I’m stuck with the Silverado.
Would you even consider that new low cost Ford pickup?
 
Would you even consider that new low cost Ford pickup?
I will believe the Ford pickup exists when it’s on lots and being sold. If it meets our needs, we’d consider it, but I don’t trust Ford or their dealers, so it would have to be a phenomenal deal, and we’d probably buy it used.

BUT.

It’s my partner’s turn next, so when the Mustang hits 100k miles (in the next year or two), she’ll be the one picking which vehicle to buy. She’s tempted by the R2, a used Gravity, a used 2025+ R1S, or a Traveler. But the Traveler and the R1 are both wider than she would prefer. And the subscription model for software in the Rivians is a huge barrier for her. We’ll see what else is out there when the time comes. She doesn’t have much interest in us owning two pickups—no need for redundant capabilities, so the Ford isn’t on our radar right now.
 
And the subscription model for software in the Rivians is a huge barrier for her.
Just so she's aware, the subscription model for software is not mandatory - you get SW updates automatically without the subscription.

The Rivian subscription plan is for additional Connect+ features, so if she doesn't need in-truck WiFi or streaming or find value in the other things below, she can just skip Connect+ altogether:

Screenshot 2026-07-06 at 2.43.46 PM.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: maynard
Just so she's aware, the subscription model for software is not mandatory - you get SW updates automatically without the subscription.

The Rivian subscription plan is for additional Connect+ features, so if she doesn't need in-truck WiFi or streaming or find value in the other things below, she can just skip Connect+ altogether:

View attachment 16891

She is well aware. And it’s not a compelling argument.
 
  • Like
Reactions: J Alynn and maynard
Sorry, was trying to be helpful so she didn't think it was a barrier, since you do get Software updates without a subscription!
She is frustrated with the way car manufacturers are installing hardware (increasing R&D and hardware cost), passing cost on to the customer and then charging a second time (subscription) for its use. She’s already annoyed with Ford for making the non-optional option of the BlueCruise hardware bump up the cost of our Mustang and then charging a subscription for it (and integrated navigation and a few other things). We’ve let the trial expire; no point in falling for the sunken costs fallacy.

Manufacturers shouldn't be making those of us who don’t want all that subsidize it for those who do. Vehicles without that hardware could easily be $2500-$5k cheaper if they only charged the people who wanted it instead of distributing the costs to everyone. Even if we don’t subscribe to yet another “only $15/mo,” we’re still paying for it. At that point, we’d rather not even buy the vehicle.

Hoping Scout doesn’t do it this way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: maynard