It uses an acoustic field to compress gas and create temperature differences. I have a project that is probably going to use Stirling coolers but I found a paper about something similar that used thermoacoustic coolers instead and that seems interesting but I can’t find much else on them
stellarix.com
Of course they did.It turns out that BYD developed one to use waste heat and the noise from their engines to provide refrigeration in their vehicles. But I don’t think it ever made it to production. Most thermoacoustic systems are still operating with a coefficient of performance below 1.0; air-source heat pumps with traditional refrigerants are operating with a range of 2.0 to 6.0 or even 7.0. In vehicles they’re typically around 4.0.
![]()
Thermo-Acoustic Refrigeration
Explore the cutting-edge Thermo-Acoustic Refrigeration technology that offers energy-efficient and environmentally friendly refrigeration solutions.stellarix.com
I lived 6 years in Ohio, and even did a summer camp in Bloomington one year. I know what you mean. Being woken up, and carried/herded downstairs into the basement. It’s not fun, but you do sort of get used to it.And we are back upstairs. Back to tornado warning. Goodness. I hate when those sirens go off.
That green color! Our basement is partially finished and has a bathroom so it’s not terrible to be down there.I lived 6 years in Ohio, and even did a summer camp in Bloomington one year. I interact what you mean. Being woken up, and carried/herded downstairs into the basement. It’s not fun, but you do sort of get used to it.
We did have a tornado take the roof off the house next to us when I was about 5yrs old. They do make a sound.
I still have memories of my mom screaming at my dad “get away from the window!!!” (The basement ones that are at like head height).
I’ve also tried to describe to my wife/kids how the whole sky would turn green at times too. And before cell phones, we knew that was a time to start thinking about placing closer to home in case a tornado warning went off.
Stay safe!
thanks! These guys must have made theirs. It is just cooling a trap for VOCs out of ambient air samples. They said they preferred it to Stirling because of the vibration of the Stirling engine which I was a bit concerned about but I think I can place it so it won't bother the instrument. FIDs are fiddly about vibration sometimesThe thermoacoustic heat engine uses the Stirling cycle to achieve its cooling (or heating), so in most ways it’s similar to a Stirling engine.
We used one on the Space Shuttle Discovery as an experiment.
![]()
Electricity-free air con: Thermoacoustic device turns waste heat into cold using no additional power
Beginning with the principles of the Stirling engine, SoundEnergy's THEAC thermal acoustic engine takes heat – either industrial waste heat or solar heat – and turns it into powerful cooling without requiring any other power source. This completely renewable technology could prove highly disruptive.newatlas.com
A company that makes industrial-sized one is called SoundEnergy. But you won’t be using one for an experiment—they make 75-100 kW and 200-250 kW (with stacking up to MW) capacities.
SoundEnergy – Thermo acoustic cooling technology
www.soundenergy.nl
thanks! These guys must have made theirs. It is just cooling a trap for VOCs out of ambient air samples. They said they preferred it to Stirling because of the vibration of the Stirling engine which I was a bit concerned about but I think I can place it so it won't bother the instrument. FIDs are fiddly about vibration sometimes
We used to live in a hollow, when bad weather kicked up we lost satellite and barely got radio, we had a landline with internet but it couldn’t keep up with the live weather streams. So we watched the sky for color changes.I lived 6 years in Ohio, and even did a summer camp in Bloomington one year. I interact what you mean. Being woken up, and carried/herded downstairs into the basement. It’s not fun, but you do sort of get used to it.
We did have a tornado take the roof off the house next to us when I was about 5yrs old. They do make a sound.
I still have memories of my mom screaming at my dad “get away from the window!!!” (The basement ones that are at like head height).
I’ve also tried to describe to my wife/kids how the whole sky would turn green at times too. And before cell phones, we knew that was a time to start thinking about placing closer to home in case a tornado warning went off.
Stay safe!
EPA method 25 uses dry ice to trap heavy hydrocarbons while the lighter ones go through into a tank. It is labor intensive sampling and laboratory work. The idea is to use the cooler to do a small automated trap that would let it be either a semi-continuous monitor or at least an onsite test instead of having to take the samples and then ship them back to the lab and then waiting a few more days for results.Very neat! What’s the ultimate goal of your device?
I would imagine you’d get similar vibration from the acoustic device as well. But that would all depend on the experimental setup. Your Stirling will be far more efficient. And I suspect it’ll be easier to isolate the vibrations of the Stirling than to build a thermoacoustic device.
Ah, okay!EPA method 25 uses dry ice to trap heavy hydrocarbons while the lighter ones go through into a tank. It is labor intensive sampling and laboratory work. The idea is to use the cooler to do a small automated trap that would let it be either a semi-continuous monitor or at least an onsite test instead of having to take the samples and then ship them back to the lab and then waiting a few more days for results.
this method is usually used in factory stacks doing destruction efficiency testing of the control devices (inlet, outlet) so there will be power available. The trap will have to be cooled to -78C to catch and then heated to 250C to release the hydrocarbons for analysis. The FID has a column-catalyst set that separates the CO, CO2, and CH4 from all the other HCs and then converts everything to CH4 before it gets to the FID so that there's no issue with differing response factors. It basically just counts carbons for mass emissions. Very useful when you don't know what all might be going in or coming out of the stack.Ah, okay!
So the goal is to run this in the field?
If it’s automated and in the field, then a thermoacoustic might work well with a solar concentrator since there’s so little energy requirement for thermoacoustic. But to get down to -78 C, you would need a fairly high-temperature hot side of the device or you’d need several stages to drop the temperature at each stage. I can’t remember the practical temperature drop in thermoacoustic, but I think it’s only a delta of around 20-30 C.
What a fun problem (when I’m not the one having to build it against a deadline)!
this method is usually used in factory stacks doing destruction efficiency testing of the control devices (inlet, outlet) so there will be power available. The trap will have to be cooled to -78C to catch and then heated to 250C to release the hydrocarbons for analysis. The FID has a column-catalyst set that separates the CO, CO2, and CH4 from all the other HCs and then converts everything to CH4 before it gets to the FID so that there's no issue with differing response factors. It basically just counts carbons for mass emissions. Very useful when you don't know what all might be going in or coming out of the stack.
I'm hopeful we will actually get to do it - working up costs and writing the proposal and fingers crossed. Research isn't a huge priority right now unfortunately but this is a method that is used a lot in regulations but doesn't have a lot of labs doing it anymore so maybe it will make it through
One of the people who will be involved in the decision making asked us why some methods use inches of water as units and wanted us to consider changing them all to PSI to make it easier. Same person also asked me "what is NIST?" So this may be an interesting processI know exactly where you are with fighting against the anti-research sentiments right now…
It sounds like you’re putting together a cool proposal! Best of luck to you and the proposal team!
I’ve run a large number of instrument development proposal review panels (for NASA, not EPA or NSF). I’ve probably reviewed around a thousand instrument proposals in my career. If you are ever interested in an independent, external review, let me know. I know those are difficult to schedule given deadlines and all.