I'm guessing there would be some significant internal debate about mounting anything like a snorkel to the exterior of the vehicle. It will impact efficiency, add wind noise, and is also symbolic of ICE and exhaust - the opposite of their messaging on environmental stewardship and delivering cleaner, more efficient trucks. A better route would be to have it flow out of the rear of the truck at the roofline, but plumbing like that will be a challenge.
It would be cool if they could route intake and exhaust through the A-Pillar and out the back of the rack system, but that would be expensive and every truck isn't going to have a rack with the Harvester. It would also be a thermal challenge and likely heat the exterior surfaces of the vehicle where it gets routed.
Anyway you look at it, the air intake and exhaust for the Harvester is an interesting engineering challenge - particularly for an EV with a series Hybrid configuration (that is a truck) and will be compared to the PURE BEV spec, which will be much simpler and won't need to contend with 2 power systems.
It would be cool if they could route intake and exhaust through the A-Pillar and out the back of the rack system, but that would be expensive and every truck isn't going to have a rack with the Harvester. It would also be a thermal challenge and likely heat the exterior surfaces of the vehicle where it gets routed.
Anyway you look at it, the air intake and exhaust for the Harvester is an interesting engineering challenge - particularly for an EV with a series Hybrid configuration (that is a truck) and will be compared to the PURE BEV spec, which will be much simpler and won't need to contend with 2 power systems.