Im more of a 37" tire guy, are we going to need a lift kit or will these squeeze in?

  • From all of us at Scout Motors, welcome to the Scout Community! We created this community to provide Scout vehicle owners, enthusiasts, and curiosity seekers with a place to engage in discussion, suggestions, stories, and connections. Supportive communities are sometimes hard to find, but we're determined to turn this into one.

    Additionally, Scout Motors wants to hear your feedback and speak directly to the rabid community of owners as unique as America. We'll use the Scout Community to deliver news and information on events and launch updates directly to the group. Although the start of production is anticipated in 2026, many new developments and milestones will occur in the interim. We plan to share them with you on this site and look for your feedback and suggestions.

    How will the Scout Community be run? Think of it this way: this place is your favorite local hangout. We want you to enjoy the atmosphere, talk to people who share similar interests, request and receive advice, and generally have an enjoyable time. The Scout Community should be a highlight of your day. We want you to tell stories, share photos, spread your knowledge, and tell us how Scout can deliver great products and experiences. Along the way, Scout Motors will share our journey to production with you.

    Scout is all about respect. We respect our heritage. We respect the land and outdoors. We respect each other. Every person should feel safe, included, and welcomed in the Scout Community. Being kind and courteous to the other forum members is non-negotiable. Friendly debates are welcomed and often produce great outcomes, but we don't want things to get too rowdy. Please take a moment to consider what you post, especially if you think it may insult others. We'll do our best to encourage friendly discourse and to keep the discussions flowing.

    So, welcome to the Scout Community! We encourage you to check back regularly as we plan to engage our members, share teasers, and participate in discussions. The world needs Scouts™. Let's get going.


    We are Scout Motors.
I’ve been waiting for a production mule to compete in Baja as soon as that documentary was announced!

But I think a Traveler with full cage and dual spares hanging off the back (on 37s of course!) would look really, really good…

Hey @CP1@scoutmotors you know an EV has apparently never run the 1000. Sure would be a cool way to show off the range and resilience of a Harvester model….
love this idea
 
Echoing @SpaceEVDriver - it’s taken the Bronco aftermarket about 5 years to reach a decent saturation of options, and is still nowhere near Jeep levels.

Worth noting that Jeep owners can finance a whole bunch of aftermarket parts through Chrysler Capital as part of their purchase, which has certainly helped drive their aftermarket.
Out of fairness the Wrangler didn’t take a 20+ year hiatus either and wranglers don’t evolve that much from one gen to the next. But I get your point
 
… wranglers don’t evolve that much from one gen to the next. But I get your point
That’s part of the point, though. Right?

Jeep’s Wrangler generations are 10+ years long. The JK was introduced in 2006, the JL in 2017—and that’s the generation we’re still on. The difference between a JK and a JL are minimal when it comes to many aftermarket parts. Their widths are basically identical so minor changes to bumpers, etc., are required to meet the specs. And the aftermarket vendors haven’t had to do *anything* substantial for almost 20 years to keep their products relevant.

Similarly, many aftermarket parts for a Second (2005), Third (2015), or Fourth (2024) Gen Tacomas are very, very similar and don’t require much in the way of redevelopment.

For Jeep, Toyota, Ford, etc., an aftermarket developer of…I don’t know, say rock sliders...can take their product, change the locations of gussets and mounting points, maybe add a bit of length or shorten a bit, and it’s ready to mount onto the next generation vehicle. If they want to update the appearance, they can do so. But the basics will not change dramatically in between.

If Scout hopes to build a quality aftermarket, they have to quickly get specs and expectations out to developers. And the developers have to have reasonable expectations that their products will be valuable for years to come and that only minor changes to their products will be required as Scout makes changes to their generations. Otherwise they’ll be playing catch-up on R&D and that gets expensive.
 
That’s part of the point, though. Right?

Jeep’s Wrangler generations are 10+ years long. The JK was introduced in 2006, the JL in 2017—and that’s the generation we’re still on. The difference between a JK and a JL are minimal when it comes to many aftermarket parts. Their widths are basically identical so minor changes to bumpers, etc., are required to meet the specs. And the aftermarket vendors haven’t had to do *anything* substantial for almost 20 years to keep their products relevant.

Similarly, many aftermarket parts for a Second (2005), Third (2015), or Fourth (2024) Gen Tacomas are very, very similar and don’t require much in the way of redevelopment.

For Jeep, Toyota, Ford, etc., an aftermarket developer of…I don’t know, say rock sliders...can take their product, change the locations of gussets and mounting points, maybe add a bit of length or shorten a bit, and it’s ready to mount onto the next generation vehicle. If they want to update the appearance, they can do so. But the basics will not change dramatically in between.

If Scout hopes to build a quality aftermarket, they have to quickly get specs and expectations out to developers. And the developers have to have reasonable expectations that their products will be valuable for years to come and that only minor changes to their products will be required as Scout makes changes to their generations. Otherwise they’ll be playing catch-up on R&D and that gets expensive.
Agreed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pwrofgrayskull
Why don't you think there will be any penalty? Or, are you just saying you can choose to ignore physics and science? Which, yes, I guess you would be right about.

BTW, I'm not trying to by "right or wrong" - just demonstrating through the comparisons that in the real world tires and wheels WILL play an important role in determining an EV trucks overall efficiency, which will impact range.
I hope you stretched before reaching that hard Bud.

You’re the only one saying there isn’t a penalty, because I certainly didn’t.

I’m just saying the size of the tires has far less influence over NVH and I cannot figure out why that myth keeps getting regurgitated. Because it’s simply not true.
 
I had my fun with mud when I was younger. I avoid mud whenever possible now - too little fun for the amount of clean-up and possibility for parts breakages.

I understand the skepticism as my results have been fantastic in my opinion. I don’t have the trailer anymore, but I towed it as high as 10,000 feet one time. Typical tow elevations were sea level to 8,000 feet and everywhere in between. Those numbers discussed were from regular driving, not towing mpg or highway speeds exceeding 67mph.

I have my odometer correction via AEV ProCal SNAP - installed at the time of lift/tire installation. I haven’t hand calculated for quite some time, but when I did back in the day the numbers were very, very close.

My gauges could be lying to me for sure, but I like what they’re whispering in my ear. My wife’s Jeep was getting similar numbers as me, but always about 2mpg less which makes sense because her right foot typically asserts itself with more attitude and I do a lot more coasting to stops. The gauge mileage and range jives whenever I do a head calculation when filling up. I can manually calculate my next tank, but if I find out any bad news I will blame you.
Mud is definitely for the birds! My buddy had a hard time with his JKU Rubincon in the mud on one trail in stock form. He just couldn’t get the tires to spin fast enough to clear them. I was able to just bounce off the rev limiter and climb up.

That 4:1 ratio is phenomenal on hill climbs but not great in mud and snow.


That is absolutely wild.

Stoked for you about the fuel mileage. Very very impressive especially at altitude.

You’re right though, driving style plays a huge role in efficiency.

No need to prove yourself. You’re just one of the only people I have encountered getting those types of figures.

My buddies on 37”s see 14-17mpg on the highway but city driving is around 9mpg. 21mpg is quite the achievement.

I just hope Mopar engineers don’t catch wind of your fuel mileage and detune in the middle of the night 😆
 
  • Like
Reactions: pwrofgrayskull
Mud is definitely for the birds! My buddy had a hard time with his JKU Rubincon in the mud on one trail in stock form. He just couldn’t get the tires to spin fast enough to clear them. I was able to just bounce off the rev limiter and climb up.

That 4:1 ratio is phenomenal on hill climbs but not great in mud and snow.


That is absolutely wild.

Stoked for you about the fuel mileage. Very very impressive especially at altitude.

You’re right though, driving style plays a huge role in efficiency.

No need to prove yourself. You’re just one of the only people I have encountered getting those types of figures.

My buddies on 37”s see 14-17mpg on the highway but city driving is around 9mpg. 21mpg is quite the achievement.

I just hope Mopar engineers don’t catch wind of your fuel mileage and detune in the middle of the night 😆
Definitely and maybe that recent tank was just a really good brew of 91 octane or my engine finally broke in :ROFLMAO: because I’m typically getting more like 18mpg mixed driving on 85 octane at 3000-6000 feet elevation for most of my driving.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chavannigans
Mud is definitely for the birds! My buddy had a hard time with his JKU Rubincon in the mud on one trail in stock form. He just couldn’t get the tires to spin fast enough to clear them. I was able to just bounce off the rev limiter and climb up.

That 4:1 ratio is phenomenal on hill climbs but not great in mud and snow.


That is absolutely wild.

Stoked for you about the fuel mileage. Very very impressive especially at altitude.

You’re right though, driving style plays a huge role in efficiency.

No need to prove yourself. You’re just one of the only people I have encountered getting those types of figures.

My buddies on 37”s see 14-17mpg on the highway but city driving is around 9mpg. 21mpg is quite the achievement.

I just hope Mopar engineers don’t catch wind of your fuel mileage and detune in the middle of the night 😆
:ROFLMAO: Luckily mine is old enough that Mopar can’t touch it unless I go to the dealer, which I have no intention of doing. No such thing as an over-the-air update with these things if that’s what you mean.
 
Totally agree that you can have smaller diameter / super loud tires... You can't ignore physics and science when you increase size, weight, profile, etc. If people are going to run 37's, by all means go nuts! But you'd be kidding yourself if you didn't think there would be a tangible penalties involved. Since we are talking about EV's, efficiency is often a discussion point. That is my only point.
I think I owe you an apology after misreading this comment.

Sorry bro.
 
Guys…

I couldn’t sleep. I’m too worried.

That sounded like a really bad cough.

Can somebody check on Jamie?
He’s OK. He’s sleeping in my garage with the newly done Scouts. Been a little damp here so I think that caused the cough but I put the heater on and gave him an extra blanket. The portobello gray and butter yellow paint jobs look great. Oops-I did it again (call me Brittany)
 
I’ve been waiting for a production mule to compete in Baja as soon as that documentary was announced!

But I think a Traveler with full cage and dual spares hanging off the back (on 37s of course!) would look really, really good…

Hey @CP1@scoutmotors you know an EV has apparently never run the 1000. Sure would be a cool way to show off the range and resilience of a Harvester model….
I am right in line with you. I have discussed this with Sean Barber and he is chomping at the bit to get his hands on one of our early builds for this exact reason. Not sure where this is going yet. But if it materializes you can bet I am getting involved.
 
I am right in line with you. I have discussed this with Sean Barber and he is chomping at the bit to get his hands on one of our early builds for this exact reason. Not sure where this is going yet. But if it materializes you can bet I am getting involved.
Hell, put me on that list. I can unroll tarps and hand people tools and I’ll bring my own food and beer!
 
I am right in line with you. I have discussed this with Sean Barber and he is chomping at the bit to get his hands on one of our early builds for this exact reason. Not sure where this is going yet. But if it materializes you can bet I am getting involved.
Maybe Sean Barber can be Brad Pitt's stunt double for F1 V2...
 
Some of ya'll talking 37s already and I'm over here hoping that 33s don't look goofy since we're all so used to seeing 35s on the test vehicles.

Don't get me wrong, 35s are cool. I have 35s on my 06 Wrangler. If I am going to be doing any trail riding, I'll take the LJ. The extent of the offroad my Scout will see will be dirt driveways/parking lots. I want the most efficient trim possible and I figure 33s will get that.
 
Some of ya'll talking 37s already and I'm over here hoping that 33s don't look goofy since we're all so used to seeing 35s on the test vehicles.

Don't get me wrong, 35s are cool. I have 35s on my 06 Wrangler. If I am going to be doing any trail riding, I'll take the LJ. The extent of the offroad my Scout will see will be dirt driveways/parking lots. I want the most efficient trim possible and I figure 33s will get that.

I’m considering for my Lightning going to 32s for three seasons and keeping the 33s for winter. If I were to start doing more trail driving with the Lightning, I might get a set of wheels and tires specifically for that. But the most I’ll likely ever do in it is forest service roads and very light crawling.