If the charger works and you're near a highway. I've traveled on so many offroads and arrived to charging networks that didn't work.Hmmm....
Strap a super heavy, extremely loud generator of your hitch that will pogo like a 10-year old on a playground.
Or - Take your lightening to the DCFC and charge en route to cover 500 miles.
Think I'll stop and charge and eat everytime.
If this is to be accurate then scout would be pulling a major Tesla move, over promise, severely under deliver. And if they did that for one they'd likely do it for everythingIf Scout sticks with a 130 kWh battery (EV-only), which is similar to the Lightning, the realistic range is around 250–280 miles on average—and that’s before you’re already thinking about finding the next charger. Sure, you can run it to 0%, but the 350-mile range figure is more of a paper number than a real-world expectation.
There's no way to get 350 miles out of 130 kw on a vehicle that's the same size as the Lightning unless your doing 45 mph with no AC.If this is to be accurate then scout would be pulling a major Tesla move, over promise, severely under deliver. And if they did that for one they'd likely do it for everything
Man! Can you imagine being off-road with a gigantic generator bouncing around off the ass-end of your truck, sounds awesome.If the charger works and you're near a highway. I've traveled on so many offroads and arrived to charging networks that didn't work.
lol no one said you had to. I am talking about boondocking offgrid. If you have tensioned hitch, no bounce.. Besides stow in the rear bed strapped down. Ya.. It's nice when you have good places to charge but if you have ever traveled way out where there is none, it sucks. App says it should work.. Does it work? no. You get there with 30 miles of range left and find that out.. That experience sucks and leaves people wanting to go back to ICE. What do you do? You call the tow truck bc there isn't any charging for 150 miles. What I do is carry a 50amp extension and check RV places as a worst case scenario.Man! Can you imagine being off-road with a gigantic generator bouncing around off the ass-end of your truck, sounds awesome.
I'm on the East Coast luckily, and we have excellent infrastructure up and down the ENTIRE corridor. Non-issue for interstate travel.
And nobody is stopping anyone from going way off grid to boondock and take a generator! People do that all the time!
…or just buy the HarvesterHmmm....
Strap a super heavy, extremely loud generator of your hitch that will pogo like a 10-year old on a playground.
Or - Take your lightening to the DCFC and charge en route to cover 500 miles.
Think I'll stop and charge and eat everytime.
I was going to buy it but not anymore. And there's no mention if the Harvester will charge stationary. You might be in the same boat.…or just buy the Harvester
I believe @Jamie@ScoutMotors as indicated this will be possible in Camp mode.I was going to buy it but not anymore. And there's no mention if the Harvester will charge stationary. You might be in the same boat.
That's good news but still going EV only and I hope Scout will make at bare minimum the port in the back available.I believe @Jamie@ScoutMotors as indicated this will be possible in Camp mode.
Yes! Or that. LOL.…or just buy the Harvester
If you're willing to take a 50% cut for towing and slower performance and handling, this is for you.Yes! Or that. LOL.
Not for me, but for some it makes perfect sense.If you're willing to take a 50% cut for towing and slower performance and handling, this is for you.
There's going to be trade-offs and that's why I'm trying to bring this up now because the direction I want to go is obviously regular EV but then having some simple, thoughtful strategies would be very goodNot for me, but for some it makes perfect sense.
The simplicity, performance, lack of maintenance, and no secondary system far outweigh any edge case I may have for a Harvester. I'm sure that also having nearly 60K miles under my belt on my current R1T probably makes my decision a lot easier to go BEV. I remain perfectly content watching others elect to buy the Harvester. It will wind up being a bridge vehicle for many buyers - likely leading to their first pure EV (and helping Scout sell trucks). I just view EREV's as obsolete technology already, but certainly not for others based on their individual use-case or where they live, which is fine. Eventually, and as infrastructure continues to grow, there will be fewer and fewer EREVs.
Good thing you're not buying a boat. Everything is a trade-off.There's going to be trade-offs and that's why I'm trying to bring this up now because the direction I want to go is obviously regular EV but then having some simple, thoughtful strategies would be very good
We need to talk about drone props attachment addonsGood thing you're not buying a boat. Everything is a trade-off.
You're definitely making me reconsider the Harvester and just sticking with BEV. Initially I wanted to try something new, but the first thing I could think of when hearing about the Harvester was what and when the complications will start to show with two powertrains working together, and the thought of pulling into a gas station or having to schedule an oil change makes me want to run in the other direction.Not for me, but for some it makes perfect sense.
The simplicity, performance, lack of maintenance, and no secondary system far outweigh any edge case I may have for a Harvester. I'm sure that also having nearly 60K miles under my belt on my current R1T probably makes my decision a lot easier to go BEV. I remain perfectly content watching others elect to buy the Harvester. It will wind up being a bridge vehicle for many buyers - likely leading to their first pure EV (and helping Scout sell trucks). I just view EREV's as obsolete technology already, but certainly not for others based on their individual use-case or where they live, which is fine. Eventually, and as infrastructure continues to grow, there will be fewer and fewer EREVs.
I tow - but only locally. I boondock, but I'm in New England. I road trip, but usually on the I-95 corridor. I do a $hit-ton of winter driving, but usually within relatively easy range of a DCFC (even if I'm going into a backcountry zone).You're definitely making me reconsider the Harvester and just sticking with BEV. Initially I wanted to try something new, but the first thing I could think of when hearing about the Harvester was what and when the complications will start to show with two powertrains working together, and the thought of pulling into a gas station or having to schedule an oil change makes me want to run in the other direction.
I don't tow, I don't haul, I commute, and play in the woods on the weekends, and with charging infrastructure as good as it is not only east coast but across the country a high range BEV is easily the best option.
I tow - but only locally. I boondock, but I'm in New England. I road trip, but usually on the I-95 corridor. I do a $hit-ton of winter driving, but usually within relatively easy range of a DCFC (even if I'm going into a backcountry zone).
I know the harvester will be great for some people - I just don't need it at all, and I don't mind stopping at all to charge and eat on a 600 mile road trip (which I consider to be an edge case). Everyone has a different situation though.