General suggestion

[LRK]

I posted my strong feelings that the Traveler should also have a 240 V outlet.V2H charging is fine through the charge port. But, V2L or V2H with a 240 outlet, makes the vehicle infinitely more valuable; at an extremely frugal cost to Scout. I hate to see Scout cheap out a beautifully designed vehicle with substandard hardware, features, and software. Rivian has completely failed in this area. Don’t repeat their mistake.

I have owned and driven several Teslas since 2020. The only capable Tesla is the cyber truck. That failed on.Musk’s over promising and under delivering; Range, cost, no spare tire, a finish that has to be wrapped, and the expensive V2H power share. I have driven the cyber truck. It is fantastic to drive and I could have even accepted the design. But it could not overcome its shortcomings.

Scout can get it right, just follow Tesla's, features, software, security mode, dash cams, and add Scout’s unique features. Scout is over the top with design and off-road features. Use what Tesla has already proven successful.

Don’t cheapen your product.

 

[cyure]

Hello! I see that you started another thread here about the 240V outlet. I didn’t respond on the other thread as I have not had a need for one. Seems like others do as well and they have replied as such on your other thread.

I did want to take a quick second and respond to the rest of your comments.

I don’t mean any disrespect by this, but if I wanted a Tesla I would have purchased a Tesla. I do not and I am counting on Scout to make their own path and not follow anyone.

My understanding is Scout will not be duplicating Rivians software. They are developing their own UX, which makes me very happy.

When it comes right down to it, Scouts lead the way, they don’t follow.