Extra, Extra....Read All About It!

  • From all of us at Scout Motors, welcome to the Scout Community! We created this community to provide Scout vehicle owners, enthusiasts, and curiosity seekers with a place to engage in discussion, suggestions, stories, and connections. Supportive communities are sometimes hard to find, but we're determined to turn this into one.

    Additionally, Scout Motors wants to hear your feedback and speak directly to the rabid community of owners as unique as America. We'll use the Scout Community to deliver news and information on events and launch updates directly to the group. Although the start of production is anticipated in 2026, many new developments and milestones will occur in the interim. We plan to share them with you on this site and look for your feedback and suggestions.

    How will the Scout Community be run? Think of it this way: this place is your favorite local hangout. We want you to enjoy the atmosphere, talk to people who share similar interests, request and receive advice, and generally have an enjoyable time. The Scout Community should be a highlight of your day. We want you to tell stories, share photos, spread your knowledge, and tell us how Scout can deliver great products and experiences. Along the way, Scout Motors will share our journey to production with you.

    Scout is all about respect. We respect our heritage. We respect the land and outdoors. We respect each other. Every person should feel safe, included, and welcomed in the Scout Community. Being kind and courteous to the other forum members is non-negotiable. Friendly debates are welcomed and often produce great outcomes, but we don't want things to get too rowdy. Please take a moment to consider what you post, especially if you think it may insult others. We'll do our best to encourage friendly discourse and to keep the discussions flowing.

    So, welcome to the Scout Community! We encourage you to check back regularly as we plan to engage our members, share teasers, and participate in discussions. The world needs Scouts™. Let's get going.


    We are Scout Motors.
They seem to try and go “futuristic” when retro is right there waiting for them.

Automakers idea of "futuristic" is something they saw in a Playstation 1 game.

I don't think everything needs to be retro - there's plenty of articles about the pitfalls of nostalgia - the funny thing is, even these "futuristic" designs are based on the future from a retro/80s point of view. The Tesla unapologetically (for better or worse) took the design of the Cybertruck from Blade Runner.

There's definitely a place for taking design cues from the past - I admittedly like the Scout because it feels like a throwback (so I'm part of the nostalgia problem? lol), but it also feels current - but I also think automakers need to keep moving forward with their designs. Hard lines & angles aren't inherently bad, the issue is when they go too far to the extreme (and same can be said for going too retro).
 
I don't think everything needs to be retro - there's plenty of articles about the pitfalls of nostalgia - the funny thing is, even these "futuristic" designs are based on the future from a retro/80s point of view. The Tesla unapologetically (for better or worse) took the design of the Cybertruck from Blade Runner.

There's definitely a place for taking design cues from the past - I admittedly like the Scout because it feels like a throwback (so I'm part of the nostalgia problem? lol), but it also feels current - but I also think automakers need to keep moving forward with their designs. Hard lines & angles aren't inherently bad, the issue is when they go too far to the extreme (and same can be said for going too retro).
I guess you're right - but I'm old and I just seem to like retro! I loved that Ford brought back the 60s designs in the Mustang, always wanted one so that's probably what skews my brain a bit...
 
Honestly not sure if this is a joke or not. the GTR last model year was 2024, seems... recoverable?

When I bought the Scout in my profile photo circa 2005, there were a couple of other vehicles I also considered... Nissan Frontier (ruled out because I already had a Toyota Tacoma as my daily), Land Rover Discovery (too expensive, reliability concerns, would rather have had a D90 but those were too hard to find), Toyota FJ Cruiser (floor didn't lay flat for emergency car camping), and Nissan Xterra, which almost fit the bill, but I went with the Scout because of the removable top. The Xterra was a very very close 2nd place though and I had friends who were very happy with them.

Also, the Nissan Design Center used to be down the street from my office, actually it is still there: https://usa.nissannews.com/en-US/releases/nissan-design-america

Nissan is a credible competitor who I would not dismiss.
Ok, I remembered why I thought Nissan Design USA was no longer in San Diego, because they announced they are closing up by March 2026 and moving to Los Angeles, which honestly, might be the kind of help they need


While I am not doing work work, my favorite Nissan is behind the technology curve story


I'm not finding the version of the story now, but my favorite detail was Uzi Nissan had saved a receipt made out to Nissan Computer Company from Datsun, the name Nissan was using the USA prior to changing their branding.
 
  • Like
Reactions: maynard
I would be generally inclined to agree with your statement. However, there are other ways to use "AI" besides remixing already published work. For example neural networks for increasing simulation throughput at a likely cost in accuracy, which is generally ok because any skilled engineer knows simulations are only approximations of reality anyway. The article has this paragraph

"Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is the science of determining just how well a fluid flows around a given shape. CFD helps EVs go a little farther on a charge, and big trucks offer slightly improved wind resistance. Since 2018, a Swiss company called Neural Concept has been bringing the power of neural networks to the art of CFD. Tasks that formerly took hours on supercomputers can be simulated in minutes on GPUs like those from Nvidia."

Part of the challenge with understanding "AI" is that news articles tend to lump many different things together under the same term "AI", when in fact AI is just a buzzword and there are lots of different techniques, some useful some harmful that getting that label. So, and I'm guilty of this right now also, any serious discussion of AI usage should eschew the term AI and refer when possible to the specific technique being used (LLM, GenAI for videos, neural networks (RNN, CNN, DNN, etc), and so on).

I came to this post this morning to argue about the differences between “ai” and machine learning algorithms that feed various ways of approaching what the funding beggars, press, and anyone trying to grab attention in these times. But then I finished reading your post and figured I’d have to agree with you. :)

The specific use of NNs for CFD is something I played with in the late 1990s and early 2000s. The hardware wasn’t capable enough for good solutions at that time, but it had promise for greatly increasing computational speed—with, as you note, the danger of lower precision and accuracy. Now that the hardware has caught up, this is exactly the thing NNs are great for.

I have an intern who has been using CNNs for training algorithms to recognize the difference between smoke, dust, pollen, and other airborne particles in photographs taken by Forest Service (and other) cameras for early detection of wildfires.

Neither of these use-cases is “ai” as is popularly understood.
 
I guess you're right - but I'm old and I just seem to like retro! I loved that Ford brought back the 60s designs in the Mustang, always wanted one so that's probably what skews my brain a bit...
That original redesign for the Mustang was AWESOME. And to clarify, I don't think it's necessarily bad - I also liked the Challenger retro design & the New Beetle was a fun spin on that classic - I just wouldn't want everything to be retro-ized. That's just the opposite end of the spectrum from the crazy futuristic designs we see, and I think variety is what is needed.
 
Okay now this is just too funny. We all have been talking about how big is the frunk, the tail gate area, etc. this dealer posted this on TikTok. 😹

IMG_0603.png
IMG_0604.png
IMG_0605.png
 
I came to this post this morning to argue about the differences between “ai” and machine learning algorithms that feed various ways of approaching what the funding beggars, press, and anyone trying to grab attention in these times. But then I finished reading your post and figured I’d have to agree with you. :)

The specific use of NNs for CFD is something I played with in the late 1990s and early 2000s. The hardware wasn’t capable enough for good solutions at that time, but it had promise for greatly increasing computational speed—with, as you note, the danger of lower precision and accuracy. Now that the hardware has caught up, this is exactly the thing NNs are great for.

I have an intern who has been using CNNs for training algorithms to recognize the difference between smoke, dust, pollen, and other airborne particles in photographs taken by Forest Service (and other) cameras for early detection of wildfires.

Neither of these use-cases is “ai” as is popularly understood.
1. Thank you.
2. Re: neither of these use-cases is "ai" as is popularly understood.

I agree, the important thing is they count as AI as far the funding agencies are concerned. At least, that is what I understand, I'm a bit adjacent to that area.
 
  • Like
Reactions: maynard
1. Thank you.
2. Re: neither of these use-cases is "ai" as is popularly understood.

I agree, the important thing is they count as AI as far the funding agencies are concerned. At least, that is what I understand, I'm a bit adjacent to that area.
Somehow when a person reads everything on the internet and makes incorrect assumptions, they're a dumbass, but when computers do it, it's groundbreaking and we need to fund more of it. That seems to be what most people see as AI, the popular LLMs out there.
 
I don't think everything needs to be retro - there's plenty of articles about the pitfalls of nostalgia - the funny thing is, even these "futuristic" designs are based on the future from a retro/80s point of view. The Tesla unapologetically (for better or worse) took the design of the Cybertruck from Blade Runner.

There's definitely a place for taking design cues from the past - I admittedly like the Scout because it feels like a throwback (so I'm part of the nostalgia problem? lol), but it also feels current - but I also think automakers need to keep moving forward with their designs. Hard lines & angles aren't inherently bad, the issue is when they go too far to the extreme (and same can be said for going too retro).

I came here to share some of my dislike of Elon and his B.S. In fact I was going to say something like the Cybertruck has as much relation to Blade Runner as FSD has to Waymo... and well I said it anyway even though I found this article that arguably does show a relationship between a Syd Mead sketch for Blade Runner and the Cybertruck. I still think the car in Mr Mead's sketch is 1 million percent better looking that Elon's rolling aluminum monstrosity. But that's like just my opinion man.


The article is an interesting read.
 
Somehow when a person reads everything on the internet and makes incorrect assumptions, they're a dumbass, but when computers do it, it's groundbreaking and we need to fund more of it. That seems to be what most people see as AI, the popular LLMs out there.
AI isn't even making incorrect assumptions. It's retyping someone elses incorrect assumptions.
 
Somehow when a person reads everything on the internet and makes incorrect assumptions, they're a dumbass, but when computers do it, it's groundbreaking and we need to fund more of it. That seems to be what most people see as AI, the popular LLMs out there.
I saw this description of Ray Kurzweil recently, and I think he is not the only one who deserves it. It is also just sitting there waiting to be used, as a colleague said. So I share it with you.

Word: Nostra-dumbass
Definition: When a high profile tech person repeatedly makes incorrect predictions.
Example usage: Ray Kurzweil is such a Nostra-dumbass, he published a book called "The Singularity Is Near" in 2005 and when it did not happen as predicted he published a new book "The Singularity Is Nearer" in 2024.

I'm not linking to the books, there is never a reason to advertise the works of Nostra-dumbass.
 
I came here to share some of my dislike of Elon and his B.S. In fact I was going to say something like the Cybertruck has as much relation to Blade Runner as FSD has to Waymo... and well I said it anyway even though I found this article that arguably does show a relationship between a Syd Mead sketch for Blade Runner and the Cybertruck. I still think the car in Mr Mead's sketch is 1 million percent better looking that Elon's rolling aluminum monstrosity. But that's like just my opinion man.


The article is an interesting read.
I kept seeing people saying this game is where he got it. Supposedly this design gets the highest scores for aerodynamics in this game

jolq29u5k0b71.jpg
 
I kept seeing people saying this game is where he got it. Supposedly this design gets the highest scores for aerodynamics in this game

View attachment 15384
I've seen that before also, but I never realized it was an actual game!

You might actually be able to play it yourself here: https://classicreload.com/car-builder.html#
Or one of many other website if you just search for car builder v2.02: https://search.brave.com/search?q=car+builder+v2.02&source=desktop

Thanks for bringing this up, I did not know how to find it :ROFLMAO:
 
  • Like
Reactions: maynard
I came here to share some of my dislike of Elon and his B.S. In fact I was going to say something like the Cybertruck has as much relation to Blade Runner as FSD has to Waymo... and well I said it anyway even though I found this article that arguably does show a relationship between a Syd Mead sketch for Blade Runner and the Cybertruck. I still think the car in Mr Mead's sketch is 1 million percent better looking that Elon's rolling aluminum monstrosity. But that's like just my opinion man.


The article is an interesting read.
That article, and the sketches/concepts in it, is definitely interesting, but I could have sworn there was an actual scene with a truck even closer in design to the Cybertruck. Must be some kind of Mandela Effect situation and/or I'm blurring a bunch of sci-fi armored vehicles together (similar things in Aliens, Total Recall).
 
Okay now this is just too funny. We all have been talking about how big is the frunk, the tail gate area, etc. this dealer posted this on TikTok. 😹

View attachment 15380View attachment 15381View attachment 15382

I do not believe I could fit in the Scout Terra’s frunk.

I know I can fit in the Lightning frunk with the hood closed. I am 6-feet, 1-inch tall on a good day and 6-feet on a slouchy day.

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: speedrye
I do not believe I could fit in the Scout Terra’s frunk.

I know I can fit in the Lightning frunk with the hood closed.

Well now we need someone from SM to climb in the frunk so we can see how much of them fits.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: SpaceEVDriver