Scout concepts on Jay Leno’s Garage

  • From all of us at Scout Motors, welcome to the Scout Community! We created this community to provide Scout vehicle owners, enthusiasts, and curiosity seekers with a place to engage in discussion, suggestions, stories, and connections. Supportive communities are sometimes hard to find, but we're determined to turn this into one.

    Additionally, Scout Motors wants to hear your feedback and speak directly to the rabid community of owners as unique as America. We'll use the Scout Community to deliver news and information on events and launch updates directly to the group. Although the start of production is anticipated in 2026, many new developments and milestones will occur in the interim. We plan to share them with you on this site and look for your feedback and suggestions.

    How will the Scout Community be run? Think of it this way: this place is your favorite local hangout. We want you to enjoy the atmosphere, talk to people who share similar interests, request and receive advice, and generally have an enjoyable time. The Scout Community should be a highlight of your day. We want you to tell stories, share photos, spread your knowledge, and tell us how Scout can deliver great products and experiences. Along the way, Scout Motors will share our journey to production with you.

    Scout is all about respect. We respect our heritage. We respect the land and outdoors. We respect each other. Every person should feel safe, included, and welcomed in the Scout Community. Being kind and courteous to the other forum members is non-negotiable. Friendly debates are welcomed and often produce great outcomes, but we don't want things to get too rowdy. Please take a moment to consider what you post, especially if you think it may insult others. We'll do our best to encourage friendly discourse and to keep the discussions flowing.

    So, welcome to the Scout Community! We encourage you to check back regularly as we plan to engage our members, share teasers, and participate in discussions. The world needs Scouts™. Let's get going.


    We are Scout Motors.
Yes but that’s very argument most people have with ev’s. You don’t have to plan trips around where gas stations are now you just stop when you feel like it. I know I don’t want to be hindered. With having to stop here and there to charge or possibly going off the path to my destination. When I can just stop at one of 1000 gas stations I’ll pass on the road. That’s why range extenders basically have to happen. Before people that’s on the fence about making switch will give ev’s a chance. I’ve personally never owned one but have always seen the advantages. But the possible disadvantages have always held me back.
Cool handel name as I am a badams as well. Ya I get it but just worry that it will be hard to please most folks that need to have a Harvester. My post is meant for the 5,500- 9,500 pounds trailer crowd that a Harvester model may not work for.
 
Agree.

There are a lot of EV haters. To be honest before Scout i was not fond of them. I truly believe we are on to something here with the Harvester option. I like how we are trying to minimize the "Range anxiety"

In regards to the comments on YouTube. You are always going to have those type of folks that nit pic the vehicle in question. It took a lot to bite my tongue. I treat these 2 concepts like my babies. It's hard to read all the bashing. But I take it with a grain of salt. These vehicles have a purpose for us at Scout. And they are doing what they were intended to do. Get the discussion started and get everyone's input, good and bad.
I completely get where you are coming from and being an architectural designer I’ve suffered the same similar situations. I designed/built my own house nearly 20 years ago and put it into a parade of homes event. It’s tough to stand in your dream home and hear people criticize many things. We are in a world of 40% rules and 60% gray area design (maybe reverse that for cars) so we will never be correct no matter how great our thinking/design might be
 
Cool handel name as I am a badams as well. Ya I get it but just worry that it will be hard to please most folks that need to have a Harvester. My post is meant for the 5,500- 9,500 pounds trailer crowd that a Harvester model may not work for.
I agree some people won’t be happy with the harvester if the tow ratings end up being 5000lbs. I’m sure scott is regretting saying that now. Personally I’m really hoping that the number goes up. But if they don’t then some people will get the bev model and do as you mentioned. Others will probably buy a gas car.
 
I agree some people won’t be happy with the harvester if the tow ratings end up being 5000lbs. I’m sure scott is regretting saying that now. Personally I’m really hoping that the number goes up. But if they don’t then some people will get the bev model and do as you mentioned. Others will probably buy a gas car.

For me, I hope that the maximum tow rating for the EREV doesn't increase over 5000lbs. I need to tow, but I don't need to tow that much weight. I would rather have the EREV (and the pure EV versions) be designed as a capable/comfortable driver with medium towing capability and lower cost. I understand people that have specific requirements and need a vehicle that can tow >5,000, but I don't think this is the right vehicle for that. In my opinion, the cost increase to provide that level of towing ability isn't justified for the limited number of people that need it.
 
Yes but that’s very argument most people have with ev’s. You don’t have to plan trips around where gas stations are now you just stop when you feel like it. I know I don’t want to be hindered. With having to stop here and there to charge or possibly going off the path to my destination. When I can just stop at one of 1000 gas stations I’ll pass on the road. That’s why range extenders basically have to happen. Before people that’s on the fence about making switch will give ev’s a chance. I’ve personally never owned one but have always seen the advantages. But the possible disadvantages have always held me back.

Nah, I’m the same way. I like living a spontaneous and carefree existence, but I also have a chronic illness and am accustomed to having to do some degree of pre-planning (I’m not wheelchair-bound, but stairs are a weakness… am I going to get around okay, is there air conditioning, is there water, etc). I think the kind of effort you put into road tripping with an EV might not end up being so different from the effort you put into any road trip (do you make a play list, do you bring snacks, do you bring overnight stuff, do you tell people that you’re going to be in the area and want to get coffee/get dinner/want to lay low in the spare bedroom, etc). It seems like the effort amounts to “plan route from A to B” followed by “where the chargers at?”

Lots of people here have written about how they do their road trips and it’s been really informative and helpful. Honestly, it’s relieved a lot of my concerns about range anxiety.

This is a great thread:
 
For me, I hope that the maximum tow rating for the EREV doesn't increase over 5000lbs. I need to tow, but I don't need to tow that much weight. I would rather have the EREV (and the pure EV versions) be designed as a capable/comfortable driver with medium towing capability and lower cost. I understand people that have specific requirements and need a vehicle that can tow >5,000, but I don't think this is the right vehicle for that. In my opinion, the cost increase to provide that level of towing ability isn't justified for the limited number of people that need it.
They seem to have taken steps to lower the cost the on the erev models. I agree with the affordability point. But I also think that by coming with such a low number they would be losing a good chunk of sales. Hopefully they will find a nice middle ground of keeping cost down and still be capable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: J Alynn and THil08
Nah, I’m the same way. I like living a spontaneous and carefree existence, but I also have a chronic illness and am accustomed to having to do some degree of pre-planning (I’m not wheelchair-bound, but stairs are a weakness… am I going to get around okay, is there air conditioning, is there water, etc). I think the kind of effort you put into road tripping with an EV might not end up being so different from the effort you put into any road trip (do you make a play list, do you bring snacks, do you bring overnight stuff, do you tell people that you’re going to be in the area and want to get coffee/get dinner/want to lay low in the spare bedroom, etc). It seems like the effort amounts to “plan route from A to B” followed by “where the chargers at?”

Lots of people here have written about how they do their road trips and it’s been really informative and helpful. Honestly, it’s relieved a lot of my concerns about range anxiety.

This is a great thread:
Seems like a great thread I haven’t had time to read it all yet.
 
I completely get where you are coming from and being an architectural designer I’ve suffered the same similar situations. I designed/built my own house nearly 20 years ago and put it into a parade of homes event. It’s tough to stand in your dream home and hear people criticize many things. We are in a world of 40% rules and 60% gray area design (maybe reverse that for cars) so we will never be correct no matter how great our thinking/design might be

Being in the same world, I completely get it. I can design an individual home to make someone completely happy, but designing a spec house for the masses is a different animal and it's a numbers game on what "most" people are wanting. I suspect designing vehicles is the same way and you've got to choose your niche that you're targeting.

As to towing, I think it just needs to be competitive. I'm not sure what Scout is targeting as the competition, but the 4Runner has 6k towing, the Tahoe has ~8k towing, the Grand Cherokee is ~6k, etc. There are some like the Wrangler and Explorer with lower capabilities, but the 4Runner seems to be the most natural competition for the rugged outdoorsy vehicle that can go places, do things and be accepting of less-than-carlike manners due to the solid rear axle, body-on-frame design, etc.

Has it been stated what vehicles Scout has been benchmarking? I'd be very curious.
 
Last edited:
As to towing, I think it just needs to be competitive. I'm not sure what Scout is targeting as the competition, but the 4Runner has 6k towing, the Tahoe has ~8k towing, the Grand Cherokee is ~6k, etc. There are some like the Wrangler and Explorer with lower capabilities, but the 4Runner seems to be the most natural competition for the rugged outdoorsy vehicle that can go places, do things and be accepting of less-than-carlike manners due to the solid rear axle, body-on-frame design, etc.

Has it been stated what vehicles Scout has been benchmarking? I'd be very curious.
I relate to this comment. My next SUV planned was a 2025/2026 4Runner, got excited about the iForce Max released this year. Only drawback to it was not being a plug-in Hybrid. I would love to go full EV, but have range anxiety (cold ski trips). Scout came in and checked all of boxes I want (reality or dream), including looking rugged awesome. The 4Runner is more aggressive looking, but the Scout has this awesome retro feel that I'm obsessed with. Currently have a 2013 Pathfinder with 5000lb towing capability, which has towed exactly 0lbs (unless you count 4 bikes on a hitch mount rack). While I want to have towing capability just in case, my requirement isn't going to be substantial (U-Haul trailer, small rental camper, etc..) and 5000 will be just fine. I too am curious as to what Scout views as benchmark vehicles.
 
I relate to this comment. My next SUV planned was a 2025/2026 4Runner, got excited about the iForce Max released this year. Only drawback to it was not being a plug-in Hybrid. I would love to go full EV, but have range anxiety (cold ski trips). Scout came in and checked all of boxes I want (reality or dream), including looking rugged awesome. The 4Runner is more aggressive looking, but the Scout has this awesome retro feel that I'm obsessed with. Currently have a 2013 Pathfinder with 5000lb towing capability, which has towed exactly 0lbs (unless you count 4 bikes on a hitch mount rack). While I want to have towing capability just in case, my requirement isn't going to be substantial (U-Haul trailer, small rental camper, etc..) and 5000 will be just fine. I too am curious as to what Scout views as benchmark vehicles.
Toyota is has been blue balling us with the Holy Grail of EV tech (solid state batteries) for what feels like a decade at this point, but it seems things are growing closer to fruition.


It will be interesting to see if they strictly keep them in house or license them to small scale companies like Scout in the future.
 
I'm not sure why Scout would ever license anything from Toyota - particularly when Scout has the backing of VW, and VW is essentially building batteries through PowerCo. Not to mention Tariffs. Not to mention that Toyota gave up its early lead in Hybrid and electric tech long ago when they caved to the Japan O&G lobby
 
I'm not sure why Scout would ever license anything from Toyota - particularly when Scout has the backing of VW, and VW is essentially building batteries through PowerCo. Not to mention Tariffs. Not to mention that Toyota gave up its early lead in Hybrid and electric tech long ago when they caved to the Japan O&G lobby
They are still pining for Hydrogen, but if the US never adopts Thorium reactors there will never be an infrastructure for it in our market.

But I can see them licensing the tech to other manufacturers. No reason to throw the baby out with the bath water if it means CHEAPER production and BETTER energy storage.

Car companies license patents to each other all the time so this isnt really that outlandish.
 
Agreed - the concept is not outlandish, but the partnership with Toyota might be. And I think PowerCo is already doing this with QuantumScape (or was planning to). My comment was more about the likely alliances, not the concept of licensing itself
 
Second gen scouts might get solid state, but I wouldn't bet on it. The increasing trade war is going to stall any China-, Korea-, or Japan-US battery collaborations or licensing rather quickly (see recent news about those three countries organizing a 3-sided response to US tariffs).

In the US, we're about a decade behind on the research. Yes, QS and VW/PC are working on it, but QS has barely begun sending cells to be tested, so it's going to be a fairly long wait. The iterations on testing cells to redeveloping cells to developing packs to testing packs to developing modules to testing modules to developing arrays (what we might call a battery) to testing those is long and fraught. And the cells QS has sent for testing are semi- or quasi-solid state, not truly solid-state. Don't get me wrong, quasi-solid will give better energy density (Wh/L) and specific energy (Wh/kg), there's no doubt.

Toyota's claims of having a solid state by 2025 (or 2026 or...) have been in the news since at least 2010.

 
  • Like
Reactions: J Alynn
I'm not sure why Scout would ever license anything from Toyota - particularly when Scout has the backing of VW, and VW is essentially building batteries through PowerCo. Not to mention Tariffs. Not to mention that Toyota gave up its early lead in Hybrid and electric tech long ago when they caved to the Japan O&G lobby
Glad somebody else finally said what I keep thinking. If you are invested in PowerCo why wouldn’t you want to support yourself-in theory
 
Another big development in regards to domestically produced EVs is two of the largest lithium deposits in the US that have caused quite the stir in recent years and may be getting tapped soon.

The one in Oregon is believed to be the worlds largest deposits at an estimated 20M-40M tons of lithium.


And the other being in California's Salton Sea deposit believed to be at 18M tons.