Cab Options

  • From all of us at Scout Motors, welcome to the Scout Community! We created this community to provide Scout vehicle owners, enthusiasts, and curiosity seekers with a place to engage in discussion, suggestions, stories, and connections. Supportive communities are sometimes hard to find, but we're determined to turn this into one.

    Additionally, Scout Motors wants to hear your feedback and speak directly to the rabid community of owners as unique as America. We'll use the Scout Community to deliver news and information on events and launch updates directly to the group. Although the start of production is anticipated in 2026, many new developments and milestones will occur in the interim. We plan to share them with you on this site and look for your feedback and suggestions.

    How will the Scout Community be run? Think of it this way: this place is your favorite local hangout. We want you to enjoy the atmosphere, talk to people who share similar interests, request and receive advice, and generally have an enjoyable time. The Scout Community should be a highlight of your day. We want you to tell stories, share photos, spread your knowledge, and tell us how Scout can deliver great products and experiences. Along the way, Scout Motors will share our journey to production with you.

    Scout is all about respect. We respect our heritage. We respect the land and outdoors. We respect each other. Every person should feel safe, included, and welcomed in the Scout Community. Being kind and courteous to the other forum members is non-negotiable. Friendly debates are welcomed and often produce great outcomes, but we don't want things to get too rowdy. Please take a moment to consider what you post, especially if you think it may insult others. We'll do our best to encourage friendly discourse and to keep the discussions flowing.

    So, welcome to the Scout Community! We encourage you to check back regularly as we plan to engage our members, share teasers, and participate in discussions. The world needs Scouts™. Let's get going.


    We are Scout Motors.
It seems that after the Jeep Gladiator was released with only a crewcab and tiny cargo box nearly everyone jumped on the one cab style bandwagon justifying it with; reduced production complexity, crewcabs out sell** others, and farm/ranch/contractors will get full size basic regular cab trucks.

Newest midsize GM Twins and Ford Ranger are crewcab limited.
I and many in the anti-crewcab camp have decided not be buy a new truck, live with the ones we have, due to the crewcab limitations.

With luck the Scout Terra final production release will include a smaller cab & larger cargo box version . . . extended cab (supercab) with a 6.5 foot bed would be fine (and yes one extra foot of cargo bed does make a difference).

** crewcabs out sell others because that is what dealers stock, that is what GM/Ford/etc push as they have higher profit margins

My goal is to wait for yr-2027. If GM or Ford produce a mid-size extended cab 6.5'ish bed I'll buy it,
if Scout actually builds/ships Terra in 2027 . . . I will bite the bullet and live with a crewcab,
after all the initial specs of the Terra with Harvester option are impressive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Skiouros
In the traditional dealer model - floor plans cost money. Stocking more costs money. Now some dealers do get incentives to be regional inventory storehouses - but most dealers don't have the acreage to do that. So dealers stock what they think they can sell with the most margin.

When I got my F150 - perhaps a real bed was an option, but good luck finding one. Now at least I know it can be ordered with a 6.5' bed. But since Ford went with a common cab, that mostly became less important - you could always go F250 for the bed. I needed more towing capacity, so it was not even a decision. More towing capacity is the reason I traded in my 1/2 ton.

When I wanted to get a Tacoma - I did find about the same thing. They still offer an extend cab - but good luck finding one in stock. They understood that the extend cab was a workers dream (and perhaps a dog owners) - and a families nightmare. They don't even offer it with the jump seats anymore.
---
I would love to see an extend cab 6.5' bed option. I have owned multiple extend cabs and multiple crew cabs - they each have their merits. For a work truck, I do like extend cabs - as a family vehicle, backward hinged doors are a parking lot nightmare.

With factory direct sales, perhaps extend cabs can make a rebirth. I doubt they will exceed 10% of sales, but they might make those 10% of customers happy.
---
FWIW, not sure what killed the JLURD. It took 2 years to find one to test drive. Then it took 4 months for an order window (which we ordered within 1hr of it opening. I think the window was open for 2 weeks and closed again. Then Jeep said it was being discontinued due to lack of sales. How can it sell when it can not be test drove and can not be ordered?
 
  • Like
Reactions: jeremydunworth
Keep in mind they need to crash test, and EPA test every variant. For companies such as Ford that sell huge volumes, it is worth the money, for Scout likely not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jeremydunworth
Don't want, don't need a crew cab. Regular cab only, smallest compact, narrow body truck you can make is what I will buy, cash ready. Every household wants one to haul daily small loads come on Scout, don't shoot yourself in the foot by following the crew cab BS. Do you want to sell thousands of crewcabs or millions of regular cabs with 8 and 6 foot beds?
 
Screenshot 2025-03-25 at 11.26.26 AM.png
 
It seems that after the Jeep Gladiator was released with only a crewcab and tiny cargo box nearly everyone jumped on the one cab style bandwagon justifying it with; reduced production complexity, crewcabs out sell** others, and farm/ranch/contractors will get full size basic regular cab trucks.

Newest midsize GM Twins and Ford Ranger are crewcab limited.
I and many in the anti-crewcab camp have decided not be buy a new truck, live with the ones we have, due to the crewcab limitations.

With luck the Scout Terra final production release will include a smaller cab & larger cargo box version . . . extended cab (supercab) with a 6.5 foot bed would be fine (and yes one extra foot of cargo bed does make a difference).

** crewcabs out sell others because that is what dealers stock, that is what GM/Ford/etc push as they have higher profit margins

My goal is to wait for yr-2027. If GM or Ford produce a mid-size extended cab 6.5'ish bed I'll buy it,
if Scout actually builds/ships Terra in 2027 . . . I will bite the bullet and live with a crewcab,
after all the initial specs of the Terra with Harvester option are impressive.
Bravo, bravo for this.

I'm starting to think about getting a mid 80's Toyota pickup (that's Hilux to the rest of the world) and converting it to electric instead of buying a Terra, which is way more vehicle than I need or want.
 
  • Like
Reactions: speedrye
Don't want, don't need a crew cab. Regular cab only, smallest compact, narrow body truck you can make is what I will buy, cash ready. Every household wants one to haul daily small loads come on Scout, don't shoot yourself in the foot by following the crew cab BS. Do you want to sell thousands of crewcabs or millions of regular cabs with 8 and 6 foot beds?
If you want a regular cab, compact truck, it's on the way: https://www.slate.auto/

At least around here, trucks are daily drivers. They need to be able to take the whole family to dinner. They also need to be able to take the whole family (along with the boat) to the lake. Since they now frown on chucking your kids in the bed like our parents did, you need a crew cab.

Even contractors I talk to like the crew cabs because they have to go around every morning and pick up their workers to make sure they actually show up to work.

Anyway, I seriously doubt your statement of "millions" of regular cabs vs thousands of crew cabs.
 
If you want a regular cab, compact truck, it's on the way: https://www.slate.auto/

At least around here, trucks are daily drivers. They need to be able to take the whole family to dinner. They also need to be able to take the whole family (along with the boat) to the lake. Since they now frown on chucking your kids in the bed like our parents did, you need a crew cab.

Even contractors I talk to like the crew cabs because they have to go around every morning and pick up their workers to make sure they actually show up to work.

Anyway, I seriously doubt your statement of "millions" of regular cabs vs thousands of crew cabs.
Slate is interesting but it has several issues.

See: https://techcrunch.com/2026/04/12/s...ed-to-know-about-the-bezos-backed-ev-startup/

1. Some people don't like a company backed by the billionaire from Amazon. Even if I give that guy a pass, I'm not supporting anything backed by LA Dodgers Owner Mark Walter: https://sdvoice.info/l-a-dodgers-ow...surveillance-spark-backlash-from-latino-fans/
But that's just me.

2. As I understand it, Slate is marketed as a "DIY Project Vehicle". Look at how it is described in the Tech Crunch article

"The base version of the truck was revealed to be very bare-bones, with just 150 miles of range, no power windows, no main infotainment screen, and not even any paint. Slate promised essentially everything about the truck would be customizable, even down to the number of seats and the overall silhouette. "

That is a big big gap, some would say a Gulf of Mexico sized gap but not a Gulf of America sized gap because there is no Gulf of America, between what the Slate truck will be and what a 2 door regular cab Terra could be.

As someone very dear to me so eloquently said "There is no such thing as a project vehicle; either it is a project, or a vehicle, it can't be both". She speaks from experience, and if I am going to get more ribbing about that, I'm going to put it into converting a mid 80s Toyota instead of buying the Amazon truck.

YMMV. Mine certainly does.

Edit: if someone were to ask, what kind of car company would I approve of, I would approve of a car company that does things like this:

I know someone who has a Volvo, I think an EX30. They like it.
 
Slate is interesting but it has several issues.

See: https://techcrunch.com/2026/04/12/s...ed-to-know-about-the-bezos-backed-ev-startup/

1. Some people don't like a company backed by the billionaire from Amazon. Even if I give that guy a pass, I'm not supporting anything backed by LA Dodgers Owner Mark Walter: https://sdvoice.info/l-a-dodgers-ow...surveillance-spark-backlash-from-latino-fans/
But that's just me.

2. As I understand it, Slate is marketed as a "DIY Project Vehicle". Look at how it is described in the Tech Crunch article

"The base version of the truck was revealed to be very bare-bones, with just 150 miles of range, no power windows, no main infotainment screen, and not even any paint. Slate promised essentially everything about the truck would be customizable, even down to the number of seats and the overall silhouette. "

That is a big big gap, some would say a Gulf of Mexico sized gap but not a Gulf of America sized gap because there is no Gulf of America, between what the Slate truck will be and what a 2 door regular cab Terra could be.

As someone very dear to me so eloquently said "There is no such thing as a project vehicle; either it is a project, or a vehicle, it can't be both". She speaks from experience, and if I am going to get more ribbing about that, I'm going to put it into converting a mid 80s Toyota instead of buying the Amazon truck.

YMMV. Mine certainly does.
I want to see Scout succeed, but I love me some '80's Toyotas, so I'd personally rather see this project come to fruition for you. Like most old Scouts, most '80's Toyotas around here dissolve when wet and have long since departed this realm.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jeremydunworth
Slate is interesting but it has several issues.

See: https://techcrunch.com/2026/04/12/s...ed-to-know-about-the-bezos-backed-ev-startup/

1. Some people don't like a company backed by the billionaire from Amazon. Even if I give that guy a pass, I'm not supporting anything backed by LA Dodgers Owner Mark Walter: https://sdvoice.info/l-a-dodgers-ow...surveillance-spark-backlash-from-latino-fans/
But that's just me.

2. As I understand it, Slate is marketed as a "DIY Project Vehicle". Look at how it is described in the Tech Crunch article

"The base version of the truck was revealed to be very bare-bones, with just 150 miles of range, no power windows, no main infotainment screen, and not even any paint. Slate promised essentially everything about the truck would be customizable, even down to the number of seats and the overall silhouette. "

That is a big big gap, some would say a Gulf of Mexico sized gap but not a Gulf of America sized gap because there is no Gulf of America, between what the Slate truck will be and what a 2 door regular cab Terra could be.

As someone very dear to me so eloquently said "There is no such thing as a project vehicle; either it is a project, or a vehicle, it can't be both". She speaks from experience, and if I am going to get more ribbing about that, I'm going to put it into converting a mid 80s Toyota instead of buying the Amazon truck.

YMMV. Mine certainly does.

Edit: if someone were to ask, what kind of car company would I approve of, I would approve of a car company that does things like this:

I know someone who has a Volvo, I think an EX30. They like it.
Mixing politics into your purchasing decision is fraught with danger and IMO a recipe for frustration and paralysis. You highlight Volvo as an example of goodness. You know who owns Volvo right? I'd take Bezos over the PLA but that's just me.

I leased an XC40 Recharge while I was waiting for my Model X Plaid. It was a great little SUV. Efficiency was not very good but it drove well and Volvo certainly got all of the "car" stuff right - things that Tesla has long struggled with.

But getting back to the product itself. I'm not equating the Slate with a 2-door Terra. The poster said small, compact, regular cab truck. That is what the Slate is. A Terra is still a full size truck, whether it has 2 doors or 4.
 
  • Like
Reactions: maynard and J Alynn
I want to see Scout succeed, but I love me some '80's Toyotas, so I'd personally rather see this project come to fruition for you. Like most old Scouts, most '80's Toyotas around here dissolve when wet and have long since departed this realm.
The truth of the matter is I have dreams much bigger than my budget and my space for storing cars.

Because I would also like to learn how to do this (on a closed course, of course):

In a car that looks like what Steve McQueen drives in this but has been converted to EV:

So we shall see what actually happens.
 
The truth of the matter is I have dreams much bigger than my budget and my space for storing cars.

Because I would also like to learn how to do this (on a closed course, of course):

In a car that looks like what Steve McQueen drives in this but has been converted to EV:

So we shall see what actually happens.
I used to autocross a good bit back in the 90s and ran an '85 Celica mostly. The suspension and brakes were solid, but that 22RE just didn't have much power, regardless of mods. I learned to use the parking brake exceptionally well and was drifting before it was cool. That drastically improved my times, and I'll bet I could still parallel park between two cars at 50mph to this day. I really miss a proper hand brake in new cars.