They wouldn’t be able to take the heatHe definitely said that was the intent. Maybe these writers should join the forum![]()
They wouldn’t be able to take the heatHe definitely said that was the intent. Maybe these writers should join the forum![]()
electrek.co
Even that logo is a cheap imitation, it so annoying how these Chinese cars might be high tech and cheap because of where they’re made, but it says allot when they all look like if, every “Western Vehicle” were made up of of drag and drop design elements![]()
The U.S. Wants to Ban China’s High-Tech Cars, but They’re Already Here in El Paso — The Wall Street Journal
Mexican dealers are selling cutting-edge Chinese cars that U.S. consumers can’t buy. Americans are warming to the idea of them.apple.news
For consideration, a few links from Howard Yu. I just discovered this guy and so far I am impressed with his written analysis, for a b-school professor he far exceeds expectations. The video in the 2nd link was too long for me and too much "A Current Affair", if you remember that TV show.Even that logo is a cheap imitation, it so annoying how these Chinese cars might be high tech and cheap because of where they’re made, but it says allot when they all look like if, every “Western Vehicle” were made up of of drag and drop design elements
Agreed. But, the premise of the article is interesting. Also, a big point is that American brands have nearly abandoned affordable vehicles. I am very concerned about security risks associated with Chinese vehicles. But, the market is clearly interested in something different and more affordable…like yesterday!Even that logo is a cheap imitation, it so annoying how these Chinese cars might be high tech and cheap because of where they’re made, but it says allot when they all look like if, every “Western Vehicle” were made up of of drag and drop design elements
They found a loop hole. Cross the border buy the car come back through. Only thing that is questionable is what does the dmv think when they register the car?![]()
The U.S. Wants to Ban China’s High-Tech Cars, but They’re Already Here in El Paso — The Wall Street Journal
Mexican dealers are selling cutting-edge Chinese cars that U.S. consumers can’t buy. Americans are warming to the idea of them.apple.news
Agreed. But, the premise of the article is interesting. Also, a big point is that American brands have nearly abandoned affordable vehicles. I am very concerned about security risks associated with Chinese vehicles. But, the market is clearly interested in something different and more affordable…like yesterday!
As an aside, I am in the tractor and heavy equipment business. There have been Chinese machines in North America for quite a while now. What I can say is that they look the part and are less expensive. But, they do not hold up. When they need service the support and parts are often unavailable.
So, just imagine your super techy Chinese vehicle needs a software update in a few years and it’s unavailable. Or, you need hard parts due to wear or accident. Even something minor could total the vehicle. That just contributes to the throw away economy.
I had a Chinese made, but USA company branded LSV (street legal golf cart) until it was flooded out in one of Charleston’s many deluges. While it was still operational I needed some suspension parts. Nope! Needed brake lines, nope! Had to make some parts from common brands work. Never again.
This lower quality has been a steady trend unfortunately. In the 1990s, maybe late 80s, my Grandmother did not want to replace her York air conditioner for her house because it had been working fine for 50 years and she feared the new ones would only last ten years. She was not wrong.I think you hit the nail on the head. The Chinese can make a more affordable vehicle at the sacrifice of service because they're designed to be disposable, but more and more automakers have been heading that way for some time. My old '85 Toyota is MUCH more serviceable than my '07 Toyota with almost every component able to be disassembled, cleaned, serviced and put back in use with minimal effort. My '07 however is infinitely more serviceable than anything on the market today. We see the same thing with Tesla gigacastings, etc. Kia/Hyundai are notably bad for just having to replace whole assemblies. Mechanics now just replace parts with few actually understanding how to fix things. Thankfully my Kubota is still simple and easy to work on!
I'm generally at the point in life where I'd rather pay more for a higher quality item that will last longer per dollar than the cheaper alternative. This whole planned obsolescence thing is BS and we're just filling landfills with junk.
More on auto dealers. These are from March and April 2026, showing that this is not a partisan thing
![]()
Dealers Are Advertising Cars They Don’t Have. The FTC Wants It To Stop
A car shopper sees a vehicle online at a great price, clicks, calls or drives over and then learns the car is gone. Whatever the reason, that adds up to aggravation.www.forbes.com
"On March 13, the FTC sent warning letters to 97 auto dealership groups around the country, telling them to review their advertising and pricing practices. Among the agency’s concerns was a simple one that any car shopper can understand immediately - dealers should not be advertising unavailable or non-existent vehicles."
![]()
FTC Warns 97 Auto Dealership Groups About Deceptive Pricing
The Federal Trade Commission iswww.ftc.gov
“The Trump-Vance FTC is committed to preventing auto dealers from misleading consumers with low advertised prices and then adding on mandatory fees at the end of the purchasing process,” said Christopher Mufarrige, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection. “The FTC will remain focused on monitoring auto dealerships to ensure that the market functions efficiently and competitors are transparently competing on price.”
I might be skeptical of the FTC's ability to follow through on threats, and it is still significant that this is such a political no brainer that politicians from both major parties seem to be on board.
You would think there'd still be a need for storefronts even with DTC, so still a place for "dealerships" - just not the way they currently exist. Which means less money because they won't be able to be sneaky about add-ons, or as was linked above, bait & switch tactics.Ive been reading about how dealerships(stealerships) are shitting them selves over DTC. If they are so scared why not adjust, and go all online for sales?
Rivian has storefronts. Rivian Spaces. You can see panels with all the colors and materials. Schedule test drives. Order your vehicle. It can be done.You would think there'd still be a need for storefronts even with DTC, so still a place for "dealerships" - just not the way they currently exist. Which means less money because they won't be able to be sneaky about add-ons, or as was linked above, bait & switch tactics.
It's always about the money.
Many of us are here b/c we think Scout has a chance to break that mold and deliver a much more value-oriented & bomb-proof vehicle, with longevity built-in as a feature - particularly if it is easier for owners to take care of their trucks AND they can get great service and support. This is part of the Scout ethos, part of the brand identity, and a competitive advantage - if they deliver.
OEMS's with an intentionally obsolete & cheap mindset are also typically bad for the planet (and owners). They suffer from churn, and continually need to rebuild loyalty. This is expensive for any business. I feel like Volvo intentionally went down this path with Geely Holding Group starting in 2010. They maintained the exterior facade of the tried and true Volvo, then started to underpin vehicles with cheap Chinese parts. This would intentionally create more service tickets. This is no secret, and a tactic employed by many OEM's - Scout will not get sucked into this trap. Volvo just stood out in my mind as one example, and is one vehicle that I will never buy again - any loyalty I once had to the boxy brick$hit house with incredible safety is now gone - even if the cars are still very safe.
Agreed! This is what concerns me about the Chinese cars. Everyone is ogling the teck and cheap prices, but there is no depth behind them.Agreed. But, the premise of the article is interesting. Also, a big point is that American brands have nearly abandoned affordable vehicles. I am very concerned about security risks associated with Chinese vehicles. But, the market is clearly interested in something different and more affordable…like yesterday!
As an aside, I am in the tractor and heavy equipment business. There have been Chinese machines in North America for quite a while now. What I can say is that they look the part and are less expensive. But, they do not hold up. When they need service the support and parts are often unavailable.
So, just imagine your super techy Chinese vehicle needs a software update in a few years and it’s unavailable. Or, you need hard parts due to wear or accident. Even something minor could total the vehicle. That just contributes to the throw away economy.
I had a Chinese made, but USA company branded LSV (street legal golf cart) until it was flooded out in one of Charleston’s many deluges. While it was still operational I needed some suspension parts. Nope! Needed brake lines, nope! Had to make some parts from common brands work. Never again.
Just going online won’t help them. They will have to adjust their attitudes toward customers before they can compete with DTC.Ive been reading about how dealerships(stealerships) are shitting them selves over DTC. If they are so scared why not adjust, and go all online for sales?