Fair enough...This looks like a wash to me. You will have all of these factors for any ICE vehicle you buy.
Fair enough...This looks like a wash to me. You will have all of these factors for any ICE vehicle you buy.
NJ is a hugely democratic state.For now. Trump is trying to eliminate CARB regulations that are stricter than Federal regulations.
They are one of two reasons why we won't have a diesel range extender option. CARB literally wants all diesels off the road. And, off farms as well. Talk to any farmer and ask him what he would use if he couldn't buy a diesel tractor.NJ is a hugely democratic state.
And so far all he has done, is has stopped them from adding more emission restrictions. Which is good. Because Californias Regulations are crazy. Being someone that technically works for BMW, I’ve read all the emissions regulations from both California and Federal. California is the worst. They take the Motorsport out of BMW Motorsports Division.
I would say a big reason scout won't see a Diesel generator has nothing to do with CARB regulations for the most part. It has more to do with VW Diesel Gate.They are one of two reasons why we won't have a diesel range extender option. CARB literally wants all diesels off the road. And, off farms as well. Talk to any farmer and ask him what he would use if he couldn't buy a diesel tractor.
They are completely off the rails.
Yes, that is one of the two reasons.I would say a big reason scout won't see a Diesel generator has nothing to do with CARB regulations for the most part. It has more to do with VW Diesel Gate.
They've rationalized dropping the engine to replace a water pump (and other maintenance items) on the previous (v10) diesel in my Touareg.What’s wrong with German engineers?
I may be wrong, but I think an under bed/floor position is going to be a little bit lower to the ground than a traditional engine mount under the hood. So to achieve any decent water fording depth, there's going to have to be a lot of cowling and venting to higher spots (above the bed/floor) to protect the engine's bits that don't like water.I think the only thing that could make it “complex” is how access is given for servicing.
I may be wrong, but I think an under bed/floor position is going to be a little bit lower to the ground than a traditional engine mount under the hood. So to achieve any decent water fording depth, there's going to have to be a lot of cowling and venting to higher spots (above the bed/floor) to protect the engine's bits that don't like water.
That said, I don't think the engine is likely to be easily dropped like an old VW boxer. As it will be integrated as part of a genset (not to mention any cowling/venting). So access through an inspection/maintenance port in the vehicle bed/floor seems like a logical choice.
You mean like a regular engine under the hood and no frunk? I don’t think it’s likely for that to happen. That would be a huge change. When I was in Chicago I heard an SM team member state that the concepts are 85% of what the production vehicles will look like. An engine under the hood instead of a frunk would seem to me like bigger than a 15% change.Production is a ways away still. I wonder if it's a 100% certainty that the engine goes in the rear versus moving it to the front and losing the frunk in the process.
Not gonna happen. Scott Keogh has already noted the advantage of the frunk still being available despite the generator. That’s a selling featureProduction is a ways away still. I wonder if it's a 100% certainty that the engine goes in the rear versus moving it to the front and losing the frunk in the process.
I already have started planning allNot gonna happen. Scott Keogh has already noted the advantage of the frunk still being available despite the generator. That’s a selling feature
I still think if there was a way to have an add-.on battery extender that you can have set up in the frunk for another 85-100 miles would be a cool option for those wanting it but would surely cost a good chunk to do thatI already have started planning all
The stuff that’s going in there.
And battery pack in the front crumple zone seems like a bad ideaI still think if there was a way to have an add-.on battery extender that you can have set up in the frunk for another 85-100 miles would be a cool option for those wanting it but would surely cost a good chunk to do that
Someone will figure out something I’m sure.I still think if there was a way to have an add-.on battery extender that you can have set up in the frunk for another 85-100 miles would be a cool option for those wanting it but would surely cost a good chunk to do that
Perhaps but front impact battery fires are not desirableSomeone will figure out something I’m sure.
That's nothing - Japanese engineers rationalized dropping the 2.5L 4cyl turbo engine on my 2005 Outback 2.5XT to change the spark plugs, simply because they wanted to advertise the "Boxer engine" and its lower center of gravity. So that cost $450 in labor to change four $10 spark plugs.They've rationalized dropping the engine to replace a water pump (and other maintenance items) on the previous (v10) diesel in my Touareg.![]()
That's nothing - Japanese engineers rationalized dropping the 2.5L 4cyl turbo engine on my 2005 Outback 2.5XT to change the spark plugs, simply because they wanted to advertise the "Boxer engine" and its lower center of gravity. So that cost $450 in labor to change four $10 spark plugs.
I'll take the risk of a failed water pump once in a blue moon over the mandatory regular maintenance of spark plug replacement, which should be able to be done in your garage without a lift.
Every car has something wonky. My brothers Ram truck had some sort of leaking valve issue, if I’m remembering correctly, and he sent me pictures from his mechanic with the cab of his truck completely removed.That's nothing - Japanese engineers rationalized dropping the 2.5L 4cyl turbo engine on my 2005 Outback 2.5XT to change the spark plugs, simply because they wanted to advertise the "Boxer engine" and its lower center of gravity. So that cost $450 in labor to change four $10 spark plugs.
I'll take the risk of a failed water pump once in a blue moon over the mandatory regular maintenance of spark plug replacement, which should be able to be done in your garage without a lift.
Broncos cam phasers went 6 months after purchase. Pulled engine (which would be expected) and was in shop nearly 2 weeks. Repairs suck. At least less parts on the BEV modelThat's nothing - Japanese engineers rationalized dropping the 2.5L 4cyl turbo engine on my 2005 Outback 2.5XT to change the spark plugs, simply because they wanted to advertise the "Boxer engine" and its lower center of gravity. So that cost $450 in labor to change four $10 spark plugs.
I'll take the risk of a failed water pump once in a blue moon over the mandatory regular maintenance of spark plug replacement, which should be able to be done in your garage without a lift.