Extra, Extra....Read All About It!

  • From all of us at Scout Motors, welcome to the Scout Community! We created this community to provide Scout vehicle owners, enthusiasts, and curiosity seekers with a place to engage in discussion, suggestions, stories, and connections. Supportive communities are sometimes hard to find, but we're determined to turn this into one.

    Additionally, Scout Motors wants to hear your feedback and speak directly to the rabid community of owners as unique as America. We'll use the Scout Community to deliver news and information on events and launch updates directly to the group. Although the start of production is anticipated in 2026, many new developments and milestones will occur in the interim. We plan to share them with you on this site and look for your feedback and suggestions.

    How will the Scout Community be run? Think of it this way: this place is your favorite local hangout. We want you to enjoy the atmosphere, talk to people who share similar interests, request and receive advice, and generally have an enjoyable time. The Scout Community should be a highlight of your day. We want you to tell stories, share photos, spread your knowledge, and tell us how Scout can deliver great products and experiences. Along the way, Scout Motors will share our journey to production with you.

    Scout is all about respect. We respect our heritage. We respect the land and outdoors. We respect each other. Every person should feel safe, included, and welcomed in the Scout Community. Being kind and courteous to the other forum members is non-negotiable. Friendly debates are welcomed and often produce great outcomes, but we don't want things to get too rowdy. Please take a moment to consider what you post, especially if you think it may insult others. We'll do our best to encourage friendly discourse and to keep the discussions flowing.

    So, welcome to the Scout Community! We encourage you to check back regularly as we plan to engage our members, share teasers, and participate in discussions. The world needs Scouts™. Let's get going.


    We are Scout Motors.
Not to be confused with the Canyonero.

🎶Can you name the truck with four wheel drive,
smells like a steak and seats thirty-five..

Canyonero! Canyonero!

Well, it goes real slow with the hammer down,

It's the country-fried truck endorsed by a clown!

Canyonero! (Yah!) Canyonero!

[Krusty:] Hey Hey

The Federal Highway commission has ruled the
Canyonero unsafe for highway or city driving.

Canyonero!

12 yards long, 2 lanes wide,
65 tons of American Pride!

Canyonero! Canyonero!

Top of the line in utility sports,
Unexplained fires are a matter for the courts!

Canyonero! Canyonero! (Yah!)

She blinds everybody with her super high beams,
She's a squirrel crushing, deer smacking, driving machine!

Canyonero!-oh woah, Canyonero! (Yah!)

Drive Canyonero!

Woah Canyonero!

Woah!🎶
Now I want to hear you sing that at a karaoke bar 🤣
 
Well I know some people on this forum who would disagree..

I agree with your statement as far as people on this forum but their logic is also sound in its own right. You’d be amazed at how many people will spend $25,000 to put a large front porch on a house, furnish it, hang plants, etc… then sit on the porch twice a year. So I get their mindset but people won’t change overnight.
 
Well I know some people on this forum who would disagree..


From the article:
It turns out that Ford's ideal buyer isn't someone who actually wants a truck primarily for truck things at all. In fact, that buyer may very well never even hook up a trailer or fill the bed with mulch ever.

This describes 90% of truck owners in the US. Most truck drivers do not use the truck for “truck things.” It’s really quite frustrating that truck-thing trucks cost so much because they’ve become lifestyle vehicles instead of utility vehicles.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MasterSpam
Love this JerryRigEverything video of the new Lucid Gravity being driven by Zack's partner, Cambry, who is permanently in a wheelchair. The practical aspects of being a wheelchair-bound driver (and parent of two small kids) are explored. Includes some light offroading.

 
Love this JerryRigEverything video of the new Lucid Gravity being driven by Zack's partner, Cambry, who is permanently in a wheelchair. The practical aspects of being a wheelchair-bound driver (and parent of two small kids) are explored. Includes some light offroading.

One of the things I’d never considered is that Cambry is fully in the EV camp for at least one very specific reason: Because they own a home with chargers, Cambry doesn’t have to go to a public refueling station, so the transfer in and out of the vehicle at the gas station is totally unnecessary. That saves her a LOT of time and energy.
 
That crunch 🥲
Yeah. I couldn’t tell if they had it on the highest setting. They just announced their Gravity X concept, which is supposed to have better approach and departure angles.

But who knows if this will ever see a production line.

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Chavannigans

“You're used to paying for access to Netflix, Amazon Prime or Disney+ every month but now Volkswagen is getting in on the act. It's asking owners of the ID.3 hatch to pay extra if they wish their car to deliver the full performance it’s capable of.

Yes, you read that correctly: while the Volkswagen ID.3 Pro and Pro S are listed on the configurator as producing 201bhp, buyers must pay a subscription fee to reach the car's full potential of 228bhp.”




God this is worse than the heated seat subscription.
 

“You're used to paying for access to Netflix, Amazon Prime or Disney+ every month but now Volkswagen is getting in on the act. It's asking owners of the ID.3 hatch to pay extra if they wish their car to deliver the full performance it’s capable of.

Yes, you read that correctly: while the Volkswagen ID.3 Pro and Pro S are listed on the configurator as producing 201bhp, buyers must pay a subscription fee to reach the car's full potential of 228bhp.”




God this is worse than the heated seat subscription.
This is a dreadful trend. I despise this as much as I despise having to buy a car from a dealership. If it is a MUST to pay for performance then give me a lifetime option as you would pay for a larger engine on an ICE vehicle. Subscriptions tend to cost the owner more and more over time. Why do this to encourage buyers to seek jailbreaking options which in turn cost the manufacturer to continuously develop methods to defeat them?
SM has shown a friendly relationship with potential customers. This could be a deal breaker for me if SM adopts this strategy.
 
They just need to make these affordable ones faster. The lead up time is too long.

I’m getting bored with companies joining the foolishness that’s been coming from brand-T for so long: making promises they have no intention of keeping just trying to boost investor interest.

The argument that wagons, subcompacts, etc., don’t sell is disingenuous. They don’t sell because there’s only ever at most one option on the market at a time. They don’t sell because manufacturers don’t make them. They don’t make them because the tax and emissions laws, rules, and regulations—which were written by the automotive and fossil fuel industries—make it most profitable to build very large, very expensive trucks and SUVs, and not to offer the smaller vehicles.

A couple of years ago, Ford’s Farley was adamant that they weren’t going to make what he called “commodity cars.” And now he’s changed his tune. That’s a good thing. I hope others see the value in that.
 
I’m getting bored with companies joining the foolishness that’s been coming from brand-T for so long: making promises they have no intention of keeping just trying to boost investor interest.

The argument that wagons, subcompacts, etc., don’t sell is disingenuous. They don’t sell because there’s only ever at most one option on the market at a time. They don’t sell because manufacturers don’t make them. They don’t make them because the tax and emissions laws, rules, and regulations—which were written by the automotive and fossil fuel industries—make it most profitable to build very large, very expensive trucks and SUVs, and not to offer the smaller vehicles.

A couple of years ago, Ford’s Farley was adamant that they weren’t going to make what he called “commodity cars.” And now he’s changed his tune. That’s a good thing. I hope others see the value in that.
My son is very annoyed all the fun hot hatches are overseas.

And I love that Audi Wagon, but not for $150,000. It’s just nuts.

People need affordable.

And the other thing no one seems to mention is that if we are paying even the average cost of a car, so $50,000, people aren’t going to replace their vehicle every 4 years. The average age is 12. So yes they may get more upfront selling those big cars but now people are keeping them longer because they flat out can’t afford another one.
 
My son is very annoyed all the fun hot hatches are overseas.

And I love that Audi Wagon, but not for $150,000. It’s just nuts.

People need affordable.

And the other thing no one seems to mention is that if we are paying even the average cost of a car, so $50,000, people aren’t going to replace their vehicle every 4 years. The average age is 12. So yes they may get more upfront selling those big cars but now people are keeping them longer because they flat out can’t afford another one.
Exactly.

In 2000, the average age of cars and light trucks was 8 years. That average age has grown by 50% to about 12 years for both and by 75% to 14 years for cars alone. And yes, cars are more reliable now than they’ve ever been in the past, but they're also significantly more expensive relative to wages now than they ever were before. In relative-to-wages terms, their cost is creeping up to the cost of a house compared with the 1980s and earlier.