Thanks for the insight! Do you know how long it would take to charge the battery on generator from 20% to 80%? Would love to know if you can use the generator while towing or if the demand is too great on the battery packA common difference I’ve seen from various sources is about 1/2 range for a typical trip, 1/4-ish for grades. Here are some notes I’ve putting together to help me decide if I could tolerate the BEV instead of the Harvester:
BEV, 125 kWH battery, 350 mile range
Not towing:
350 miles at 2.8 mi/kWh, 10% is 35 miles, 20% to 80% adds 210 miles, 10% to 90% adds 280 miles
Towing:
175 miles at 1.4 mi/kWh, 10% is 17.5 miles, 20% to 80% adds 105 miles, 10% to 90% adds 140 miles
Towing steep grades:
87.5 miles at 0.7 mi/kWh, 10% is 8.8 miles, 20% to 80% adds 52.5 miles, 10% to 90% adds 140 miles
Climbing the Ike takes 9% of the battery
Harvester, 65 kW battery 150 mile range, 15 gallon gas tank 350 mile range
150 miles using 65 kWh is 2.3 mi/kWh, 10% is 15 miles, 20% to 80% is 90 miles, 10% to 90% is 120 miles
1/2 for towing is 75 miles or 1.15 mi/kWh, 10% is 7.5 miles, 20% to 80% is 45 miles, 10% to 90% is 60 miles
1/4 for towing steep grades is 37.5 miles or 0.6 mi/kWh, 10% is 4 miles, 20% to 80% is 22 miles, 10% to 90% is 30 miles
Climbing the Ike takes 20% of the battery
350 miles using 15 gallons of gas is 23.3 mpg, 11.7 when towing, 5.8 towing up a steep grade
Climbing the Ike takes 1.4 gallons
Thanks for the insight! Do you know how long it would take to charge the battery on generator from 20% to 80%? Would love to know if you can use the generator while towing or if the demand is too great on the battery pack
Welcome. There are lots of discussions on towing. If you use the search icon and type towing you’ll likely find a couple good hours of reading -mostly speculation but that’s what this forum is aboutAnyone have an idea what the tow range would be? Have a 7500lb trailer (with Jeep) not sure if it can get 230mi+ towing on even terrain with about 1000lb payload and 7500lb tow capacity
I mean it's all speculation on this forum unless an engineer or architect confirms it on a public forum. Was kinda wondering the range on towing something that isn't 100% of the vehicles tow capacity. Would like to see the charging output capacity of that generator. Hopefully it's a gen set from either CAT or Generac. I think a Honda gen set is still too weak to charge a EV battery pack while towing.I think telling someone you can gas and go forever at this point and time is a little misleading. SM has not officially described how the power sources will operate. Those wanting Harvester and want to drive it like an ICE can keep telling themselves it’s gas and go forever but I wouldn’t believe it until Scout officially states it. Just my personal opinion as I’d hate to see new forum members disappointed if SM says otherwise down the road
Is Scott Keogh in a high profile public interview good enough?I mean it's all speculation on this forum unless an engineer or architect confirms it on a public forum. Was kinda wondering the range on towing something that isn't 100% of the vehicles tow capacity. Would like to see the charging output capacity of that generator. Hopefully it's a gen set from either CAT or Generac. I think a Honda gen set is still too weak to charge a EV battery pack while towing.
Well saidThere are EREV spec's that have not been finalized
There are fuel spec's that have not been finalized
There are towing spec's that have not been finalized
There are battery spec's that have not been finalized
There are GVWR's that have not been finalized
There is a coefficient of drag for the vehicle that we don't know
There are considerations for efficiency based on wheels and tires that we don't know
Drivers can't control the weather or temperature or road conditions
Drivers attach accessories to the outside of their vehicles, creating more drag
Each driver will tow trailers with different GVWRs, and different trailering profiles, creating different amounts of drag
All of this will be speculation until the timing is right for Scout to publish production specs. Then real-world testing will begin with production vehicles. Then we will start to see the first trucks doing actual "truck stuff" that can be measured across a myriad of driving situations. Until production vehicles are ready with actual specs, the real-world testing will have to wait a bit. Reservations holders will be able to make much more informed decisions about which truck or which configuration (EREV or BEV) might be right for them with published specs. Until then, yes, its all speculative and based on Scout's targets.
FOR REFERENCE:
Right now (in the PURE EV truck world), there are a couple of trucks with a massive battery packs - The Chevy Silverado EV offers a 215kWh battery pack that weighs just under 3,000lbs. The curb weight of the Silverado is 8,532lbs. Its published range is close to 450 miles, and the Fast Lane Truck pulled a 6,000lb trailer behind it for 240 miles on a full charge.
Compare the Silverado to the vehicle with the closest-sized battery pack in an EV truck - the HUMMER. It offers a 212kWh battery pack that weighs about the same as the Silverado EV, BUT in real world tests towing about the same weight (6,000lbs) as the Silverado EV, the Hummer gets ~140 miles on a full charge... 100 less miles!
The point of all of this is that real-world testing will occur over time highlighting use cases that may apply to certain Scout reservation holders, helping to inform their decisions. Looking at variables, there are a lot trade-offs when building an "off-road capable EV truck". Weight being a big factor, size being another, ground clearance and height being another, suspension being another, battery protection, serviceability, wheels & tires, etc. etc. etc. - all of which also impact COST.
The above two trucks are not inexpensive (~$100K'ish). Scout is threading the needle on capability and value at their targeted price range.
I appreciate all the details!There are EREV spec's that have not been finalized
There are fuel spec's that have not been finalized
There are towing spec's that have not been finalized
There are battery spec's that have not been finalized
There are GVWR's that have not been finalized
There is a coefficient of drag for the vehicle that we don't know
There are considerations for efficiency based on wheels and tires that we don't know
Drivers can't control the weather or temperature or road conditions
Drivers attach accessories to the outside of their vehicles, creating more drag
Each driver will tow trailers with different GVWRs, and different trailering profiles, creating different amounts of drag
All of this will be speculation until the timing is right for Scout to publish production specs. Then real-world testing will begin with production vehicles. Then we will start to see the first trucks doing actual "truck stuff" that can be measured across a myriad of driving situations. Until production vehicles are ready with actual specs, the real-world testing will have to wait a bit. Reservations holders will be able to make much more informed decisions about which truck or which configuration (EREV or BEV) might be right for them with published specs. Until then, yes, its all speculative and based on Scout's targets.
FOR REFERENCE:
Right now (in the PURE EV truck world), there are a couple of trucks with a massive battery packs - The Chevy Silverado EV offers a 215kWh battery pack that weighs just under 3,000lbs. The curb weight of the Silverado is 8,532lbs. Its published range is close to 450 miles, and the Fast Lane Truck pulled a 6,000lb trailer behind it for 240 miles on a full charge.
Compare the Silverado to the vehicle with the closest-sized battery pack in an EV truck - the HUMMER. It offers a 212kWh battery pack that weighs about the same as the Silverado EV, BUT in real world tests towing about the same weight (6,000lbs) as the Silverado EV, the Hummer gets ~140 miles on a full charge... 100 less miles!
The point of all of this is that real-world testing will occur over time highlighting use cases that may apply to certain Scout reservation holders, helping to inform their decisions. Looking at variables, there are a lot trade-offs when building an "off-road capable EV truck". Weight being a big factor, size being another, ground clearance and height being another, suspension being another, battery protection, serviceability, wheels & tires, etc. etc. etc. - all of which also impact COST.
The above two trucks are not inexpensive (~$100K'ish). Scout is threading the needle on capability and value at their targeted price range.