For Audi world, that is exactly what the paddles do on the E-trons, changes the force of regen.100% 100% 100% !!!!!!!
well written and well said! "Keep It Affordable" taking it to new heights over here. i have a lot of audi customers that end up buying palisades lol
Must be the manufacturer's implementation. I've had regen on a RAV4 for 7 years and have never even noticed it (except the little graphic on the dash showing the direction of current flow). Zero noticeable effect.As as scout and tesla model y owner I sold shortly after , this was what i hated most! Or atleast be able to turn it off. I control the car and what features it has, not the other way around!!
Very different in a hybrid vs. a full EV. The EV regen braking can fully stop the vehicle.Must be the manufacturer's implementation. I've had regen on a RAV4 for 7 years and have never even noticed it (except the little graphic on the dash showing the direction of current flow). Zero noticeable effect.
Very different in a hybrid vs. a full EV. The EV regen braking can fully stop the vehicle.
You may want an asterisk or to cite sources with a statement like this.Cons are it's less efficient, it's less comfortable and it's less safe.
You may want an asterisk or to cite sources with a statement like this.
1. If regen were less efficient, EV OEM's would not implement it. Regen captures kinetic energy and send it back to the battery (and also helps preserve brake life / less wear and tear). One example:
like-for-like, there is theoretically no difference in its cars, which offer a one-pedal mode but also use a blended brake pedal. He also added that one-pedal driving is actually less efficient on the highway, likening it to dragging a boat anchor around, making it extremely difficult to maintain a constant speed.
You are either missing my point or I suck at articulating ideas and statements. I am sure you agree it's the latter. EVs generally have a more aggressive regen setting than hybrids. There may be a hybrid that facilitates one pedal driving, but I am not aware of one. However, an EV can stop the vehicle by just lifting off the accelerator if set in the higher regen levels. I am not arguing that it is unblended or blended.The one pedal - fully stop the vehicle mode, applies the friction brakes to fully stop, so a hybrid could do that as well, but I can't think of any that do, but a LOT of EVs don't do that either.
The biggest difference is just having much more aggressive regen on the accelerator pedal, which can seem strange to ICE only drivers. Which is why it should remain an optional setting.
Maybe tell that to the OP. LOL.Regen is obviously more efficient, than friction brakes.
Maybe tell that to the OP. LOL.
I think that is simply poor wording on his part.
IMO, he doesn't want regen removed from the vehicle. He wants regen removed from the accelerator pedal. A lot of people don't like strong regen on the accelerator pedal, and it isn't necessary for it to be there for efficiency, so it should be an optional setting.
The overarching theme is to implement it well and to give driver's choices - all can be achieved through optional settings and different power levels for regen. And conversely to your statement, a lot of people actually do enjoy 1-pedal driving when it is implemented well. I am one of them.
Again, and I blame car manufacturers for this, people tend to conflate “one pedal driving” with “regen”. Regen is a no brainer with EVs and hybrids, but it’s completely orthogonal to one pedal driving. I think when people dis “regen” they’re really talking about one pedal driving, not the concept of recapturing energy. IMHO, There are two main reasons that some manufacturers really push one pedal driving: 1) a minimalist design philosophy or 2) they couldn’t implement decent blended braking.You may want an asterisk or to cite sources with a statement like this.
1. If regen were less efficient, EV OEM's would not implement it. Regen captures kinetic energy and send it back to the battery (and also helps preserve brake life / less wear and tear). One example:
2. Comfort is totally subjective and tied to the implementation, settings and the driver.
3. You could argue that regen makes vehicles safer (not "less safe"). I don't think there have been many definitive studies done on safety, but this is one example: https://dsri.uiowa.edu/news/2022/02/does-regenerative-braking-have-safety-benefits
"Funded by SAFER-SIM, this is the first study we know of looking at the safety implications of regenerative braking. “You basically get a head start on the braking so that the stopping distance is reduced,” explained Chris Schwarz, PhD, principal investigator."
Again, and I blame car manufacturers for this, people tend to conflate “one pedal driving” with “regen”. Regen is a no brainer with EVs and hybrids, but it’s completely orthogonal to one pedal driving. I think when people dis “regen” they’re really talking about one pedal driving, not the concept of recapturing energy. IMHO, There are two main reasons that some manufacturers really push one pedal driving: 1) a minimalist design philosophy or 2) they couldn’t implement decent blended braking.