Is there anything SM could offer to get you to switch from EREV to BEV?

  • From all of us at Scout Motors, welcome to the Scout Community! We created this community to provide Scout vehicle owners, enthusiasts, and curiosity seekers with a place to engage in discussion, suggestions, stories, and connections. Supportive communities are sometimes hard to find, but we're determined to turn this into one.

    Additionally, Scout Motors wants to hear your feedback and speak directly to the rabid community of owners as unique as America. We'll use the Scout Community to deliver news and information on events and launch updates directly to the group. Although the start of production is anticipated in 2026, many new developments and milestones will occur in the interim. We plan to share them with you on this site and look for your feedback and suggestions.

    How will the Scout Community be run? Think of it this way: this place is your favorite local hangout. We want you to enjoy the atmosphere, talk to people who share similar interests, request and receive advice, and generally have an enjoyable time. The Scout Community should be a highlight of your day. We want you to tell stories, share photos, spread your knowledge, and tell us how Scout can deliver great products and experiences. Along the way, Scout Motors will share our journey to production with you.

    Scout is all about respect. We respect our heritage. We respect the land and outdoors. We respect each other. Every person should feel safe, included, and welcomed in the Scout Community. Being kind and courteous to the other forum members is non-negotiable. Friendly debates are welcomed and often produce great outcomes, but we don't want things to get too rowdy. Please take a moment to consider what you post, especially if you think it may insult others. We'll do our best to encourage friendly discourse and to keep the discussions flowing.

    So, welcome to the Scout Community! We encourage you to check back regularly as we plan to engage our members, share teasers, and participate in discussions. The world needs Scouts™. Let's get going.


    We are Scout Motors.
So long as battery is charged I don’t see why not. Have to set mode or know mode exists to do that
Well now here’s the next question. Since there’s an engine would they use the heat from said engine to help heat the cabin or no because it might not be running all the time?
 
  • Like
Reactions: maynard
Well now here’s the next question. Since there’s an engine would they use the heat from said engine to help heat the cabin or no because it might not be running all the time?
It doesn’t take much to build a basic a logic check in that says something like, “if the engine is running, use its waste heat; if it’s not running, use the heat pump; if you need more than the heat pump can generate, then start the engine.”
 
I hope for everyone's sake they don't try and put a 160HP engine in the Harvester. The engine should be sized to provide the average energy needed when towing a trailer on flat ground at highway speeds. Anything more than that is wasted space and weight.

Scout has already mentioned multiple modes for the EREV, and only one of the modes would run the battery all the way down: the BEV mode. I doubt that the truck will allow you to run that mode when towing. In fact, I expect that they will have a towing mode that switches on automatically when towing a trailer. It will likely be designed to work very similar to what the Dodge Ram REV will do when towing - it will run the gen-set to keep the battery above 50%. That way, there is always plenty of power available when extra power is needed for acceleration or going up hills. The battery provides the power needed to go up hills when fully loaded, the gen-set just replenishes the power when the battery gets low (during and after the hill climb).

In a proper setup, the truck will run out of gas before it gets low on battery.

Think about how likely it is to happen. Maybe 1% of the people will have a fully loaded trailer. Maybe 1% of them will try to climb the obnoxious hill with the fully loaded trailer. Running on the battery, those folks will be fine. The situation everyone is afraid of, starting at the bottom of a hill with a trailer and low battery, will only happen if the driver forces it. That is, it will only happen if the driver is trying to fail.

If you size the gen-set for that situation, then it is oversized for the 99% of the people and also 99% of the time for the remaining 1%. Everyone will have to give up the extra space and carry the extra weight of an engine that is overpowered (and less efficient), just to accommodate someone that is deliberately trying to make the truck fail. It isn't just the size of the engine, more power means more cooling and less efficiency. The engine of an ICE truck needs the power and cooling to handle the worst case scenario, and the battery in an EREV needs to do the same. The gen-set in an EREV does not.
Well stated and I'm sure power management will be handled elegantly through software. That said, towing may not be as simple as gas and go. Charging will still be inportant in many scenarios so the weeks long boondocking trips people are touting EREVs for may not be as care free as first thought to be. The good news is that charging infrastructure is soldiering on!
 
Well stated and I'm sure power management will be handled elegantly through software. That said, towing may not be as simple as gas and go. Charging will still be inportant in many scenarios so the weeks long boondocking trips people are touting EREVs for may not be as care free as first thought to be. The good news is that charging infrastructure is soldiering on!
I guess if someone wanted to refill 30 gallons of jerry cans at every other stop on their summer towing/boondocking trip, they could recharge the truck and then refuel it… Seems like a lot of time spent at a refueling station, a lot of gas smells permeating the area, and…
 
Throwing the various numbers into the math machine, we can estimate that the minimum power output to complete the Davis Dam Grade Test at 40 mph is up to about 205 kW (after accounting for various inefficiencies). A BEV truck can easily produce that; the ebeam axles Scout has said they will be using are rated for 335 to 570 kW. Add a second motor in the front, and the axles aren’t a concern. The battery can easily produce that. At 800 Volts, 205 kW is less than 260 Amps. That’s pretty easy to manage, thermally and electrically.

But can the Harvester genset produce that when the battery is too low to contribute stored energy to making power?

Well, 205 kW is about 275 HP.

The VWAG engine with a designation of “EA211" that some people think will be used is rated for 110 kW or 150 HP. There are lots of ways to increase a small 4-cylinder peak HP. But I don’t think the EA211 can be modified to nearly double its power rating while maintaining decent NVH and decent reliability.

If the EREV gets 7500 pound towing instead, and has a 7000 pound Gross weight, that brings the GCWR down to 14,500 pounds. That requires a power output of approximately 120 kW, or 160 HP. That’s achievable with some tweaks to the existing EA211 engine. Again, the existing engine will not be a drop-in to the system, it’ll require significant modifications.

After doing the math, I think I have to adjust my guess as to what the EREV tow rating will be. I’m guessing it’ll be around 7500-8500 pounds. This will also account for the higher thermal load the EREV will be producing.
There is no requirement that the vehicle pass the Davis Dam test on ICE power alone. The whole point of having a large battery pack is that it can use both the battery and ICE generator in order to pass the test.

Bottom line is that the engine does NOT need to produce 275 HP.
 
There is no requirement that the vehicle pass the Davis Dam test on ICE power alone. The whole point of having a large battery pack is that it can use both the battery and ICE generator in order to pass the test.

Bottom line is that the engine does NOT need to produce 275 HP.
That's your fault if you show up at the bottom of a jumbo hill with an empty battery and a trailer. Same way your heavy-duty diesel would fail the test if you show up with your tank on fumes.
 
That's your fault if you show up at the bottom of a jumbo hill with an empty battery and a trailer. Same way your heavy-duty diesel would fail the test if you show up with your tank on fumes.
Right-o
For that edge use case, you should always make sure you've got what you need in the battery beforehand or at some point in that journey, just pull over and idle for 15-20 minutes, whatever necessary to get you up and over at safe pace. You'll get a big whopping amount of juice on the way down from both regen and harvester.

Interesting note acquired along they way, Harvester should fill that battery from Reserve to 100% in about an hour at idle. With charging curves what they are, 120kw capable 4 cyl seems spot on. That's one capability I think folks tend to forget about - there's no excuse in setting off on a multi-day backcountry excursion with anything less than a full battery and a full tank of gas. Order of operations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: maynard
There is no requirement that the vehicle pass the Davis Dam test on ICE power alone. The whole point of having a large battery pack is that it can use both the battery and ICE generator in order to pass the test.

Bottom line is that the engine does NOT need to produce 275 HP.
If anyone has the actual spec, would love to see it. I've searched the heck out of the subject and have found references that do say it requires "minimal battery level" required to operate the system - but without the SAE spec in hand $$$, we're all subject to hallucination.
 
  • Like
Reactions: maynard
There is no requirement that the vehicle pass the Davis Dam test on ICE power alone. The whole point of having a large battery pack is that it can use both the battery and ICE generator in order to pass the test.

Bottom line is that the engine does NOT need to produce 275 HP.
You’re missing the point of the question.

The question was not does it have to, but *could* the Harvester alone pull a fully-loaded trailer up a steep slope in the Rocky Mountains with a low battery. The Davis Dam test is a less-difficult version of the question posed. To achieve the Davis Dam test, they will absolutely be using a full battery and a full gas tank. To achieve a 60 mph tow on I-70 up the 8% grade of the Ike Gauntlet, towing a fully-loaded trailer and with a low battery, the Harvester would need to produce the HP I presented in previous posts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: J Alynn and maynard
You’re missing the point of the question.

The question was not does it have to, but *could* the Harvester alone pull a fully-loaded trailer up a steep slope in the Rocky Mountains with a low battery. The Davis Dam test is a less-difficult version of the question posed. To achieve the Davis Dam test, they will absolutely be using a full battery and a full gas tank. To achieve a 60 mph tow on I-70 up the 8% grade of the Ike Gauntlet, towing a fully-loaded trailer and with a low battery, the Harvester would need to produce the HP I presented in previous posts.
Based on what Jamie has said in the past, the answer is no. The Harvester had the power for towing a light trailer at highway speeds without depleting the battery at all with the Harvester running, but heavier loads or hill climbs will rely on juice from the battery. This was awhile ago now, and things might've changed, but it stuck in my head. Obviously, that didn't give us any clue if we're talking about a small 6x12 flat trailer, or something with a lot of wind resistance, but I'd assume the former.
 
  • Like
Reactions: J Alynn
If anyone has the actual spec, would love to see it. I've searched the heck out of the subject and have found references that do say it requires "minimal battery level" required to operate the system - but without the SAE spec in hand $$$, we're all subject to hallucination.
I have the Feb 2020 spec, but cannot share the document per NDA.

The 2020 spec does not have any consideration for type of propulsion mechanism. It doesn’t matter if the vehicle uses gasoline, diesel, hydrogen, electricity, or any other source of energy. What matters is the performance (acceleration minimums) and that the GCWR rating to be sold is the GCWR rating that is tested. There was an update in 2024, but nothing I’ve seen in the update notes addresses propulsion systems to the detail you’re asking about.

The standard does require that the rating and testing be based on the vehicle base curb weight, one 150 pound driver, one 150 pound front seat passenger, 100 pounds of optional equipment, and the trailering package. A vehicle’s curb weight includes a full tank of fuel, when relevant. It would be dumb of a manufacturer of an EREV not to use the fuel if it improves the tow rating. But there’s no requirement in J2807 that they do.

The standard also says that any vehicle with selectable propulsion/powertrain for trailering should be operated during the test as per the manufacturer’s instructions.
 
You’re missing the point of the question.

The question was not does it have to, but *could* the Harvester alone pull a fully-loaded trailer up a steep slope in the Rocky Mountains with a low battery. The Davis Dam test is a less-difficult version of the question posed. To achieve the Davis Dam test, they will absolutely be using a full battery and a full gas tank. To achieve a 60 mph tow on I-70 up the 8% grade of the Ike Gauntlet, towing a fully-loaded trailer and with a low battery, the Harvester would need to produce the HP I presented in previous posts.
I read your post as proposing that Scout would need to limit the advertised towing capacity of the Harvester due to a limitation of the rig to haul with only the ICE. Based on all of the drama around tow ratings for Harvester here on the board, I wanted to make it clear to people that the final tow rating would be based on a combination of battery and Harvester.
 
  • Like
Reactions: maynard
I read your post as proposing that Scout would need to limit the advertised towing capacity of the Harvester due to a limitation of the rig to haul with only the ICE. Based on all of the drama around tow ratings for Harvester here on the board, I wanted to make it clear to people that the final tow rating would be based on a combination of battery and Harvester.
Yeah, I started the conversation as a thought exercise mostly because I am curious about the performance envelop of the EREV. I had no intention of fear mongering. I want to understand the level of planning required to manage past the initial 150 miles of battery range. There is so much talk about gas and go as if it is simply a non-issue. Clearly it will be an issue for some that requires engieering and route planning much like a BEV. Trip distance from Burlington Colorado to Grand Juntion is a great example. The distance is 410 miles. If a user doesn't understand their tech, they absolutely will have trouble in the mountains of Colorado if they are towing, perhaps even a light camper trailer. Most people don't understand how their hybrids work and have no idea how they will perform. They jus tread the marketing. Gas and go, tow rating 7500 pounds. The details @SpaceEVDriver provides are super helpful to further my personal understanding. The good news to me is that my initial question/cocnern about a loaded vehicle sceanrio (no towing) appears to be unfounded when it comes to mountain driving on a depleted battery.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hedges1 and maynard