Ev Delay

  • From all of us at Scout Motors, welcome to the Scout Community! We created this community to provide Scout vehicle owners, enthusiasts, and curiosity seekers with a place to engage in discussion, suggestions, stories, and connections. Supportive communities are sometimes hard to find, but we're determined to turn this into one.

    Additionally, Scout Motors wants to hear your feedback and speak directly to the rabid community of owners as unique as America. We'll use the Scout Community to deliver news and information on events and launch updates directly to the group. Although the start of production is anticipated in 2026, many new developments and milestones will occur in the interim. We plan to share them with you on this site and look for your feedback and suggestions.

    How will the Scout Community be run? Think of it this way: this place is your favorite local hangout. We want you to enjoy the atmosphere, talk to people who share similar interests, request and receive advice, and generally have an enjoyable time. The Scout Community should be a highlight of your day. We want you to tell stories, share photos, spread your knowledge, and tell us how Scout can deliver great products and experiences. Along the way, Scout Motors will share our journey to production with you.

    Scout is all about respect. We respect our heritage. We respect the land and outdoors. We respect each other. Every person should feel safe, included, and welcomed in the Scout Community. Being kind and courteous to the other forum members is non-negotiable. Friendly debates are welcomed and often produce great outcomes, but we don't want things to get too rowdy. Please take a moment to consider what you post, especially if you think it may insult others. We'll do our best to encourage friendly discourse and to keep the discussions flowing.

    So, welcome to the Scout Community! We encourage you to check back regularly as we plan to engage our members, share teasers, and participate in discussions. The world needs Scouts™. Let's get going.


    We are Scout Motors.
LOL we are leasing two LOLLOL. Got the rebates, only reason we considered them because the prices were too high for what they are without it. But I still have my diesel Land Rover and wouldn't give it up for a BEV for any money. That's why I'll wait for the EREV and evaluate whether it's worth the money when it comes out LOL
LOL I said "own" not LOL LOLLEASE.
 
LOL I said "own" not LOL LOLLEASE.
EVs don't make sense to own outright unless you pay cash for one, or you plan to keep it for 10 years and drive it until it's dead...or there are huge subsidies that make them a better choice than an ICE, hybrid, or EREV. With battery and motor tech advancing rapidly, I would much rather give it back and let someone else deal with battery replacement, recycling, etc. Even with an ICE car or hybrid, you can drive well past the tech lifespan of the parts and it's useful for someone as long as it starts and runs. BEVs, no matter how well you care for them, have an expiration date, and when the battery is kaput, the cost to replace it is more than the salvage cost of the car.

I'd also much rather have an EREV for the function I'll use it for. Our BEVs are town cars, not road trippers or overlanders. I want the flexibility to carry my energy in liquid form, in a can or two, so I can have the freedom to go wherever I want when I want and add a hundred miles of range in a couple minutes if I need to.
 
EVs don't make sense to own outright unless you pay cash for one, or you plan to keep it for 10 years and drive it until it's dead...or there are huge subsidies that make them a better choice than an ICE, hybrid, or EREV. With battery and motor tech advancing rapidly, I would much rather give it back and let someone else deal with battery replacement, recycling, etc. Even with an ICE car or hybrid, you can drive well past the tech lifespan of the parts and it's useful for someone as long as it starts and runs. BEVs, no matter how well you care for them, have an expiration date, and when the battery is kaput, the cost to replace it is more than the salvage cost of the car.

I'd also much rather have an EREV for the function I'll use it for. Our BEVs are town cars, not road trippers or overlanders. I want the flexibility to carry my energy in liquid form, in a can or two, so I can have the freedom to go wherever I want when I want and add a hundred miles of range in a couple minutes if I need to.
This is why I’m glad they are making both. What works for one person may not work for another.
 
It is true there is a LOT of battery anxiety. I am hoping that as the market matures, this will be reduced. Cell prices have dropped like a rock over the last 10 years. Life has improved. As a battery swap market matures with luck this will become more and more of a non-issue. Growing up, we generally put a sub 100k mile life span on vehicles. They were going to need substantial work to keep them going past that in any reliable way. Now we don't bat an eye at vehicles routinely lasting 300k.

Hopefully in 10 years we will be seeing 80% life left in batteries and swaps under 20% (maybe under 10%) of new car value. Plus swaps will hopefully be granting a new benefit - they will improve from the original.
---
I really don't want the worse of both worlds with a EREV. Needing to maintain an engine, reduced towing capacity, reduced electrical range. I have trouble believing it would be easier for Scout to start with the EREV. Really 2 major questions. Can Scout sell more BEV's than they can make out of the gate - then there is no real need to delay production of the BEV. If they can not sell them, then going with the Harvester first makes economic sense. Likewise, is there a technological reason to delay BEV production (needing time to get better batteries for instance). I guess there is a third reason, politics. Is a political reversal on credits expected just around the corner? Depending on when production actually starts, I could see waiting for an election.
 
It is true there is a LOT of battery anxiety. I am hoping that as the market matures, this will be reduced. Cell prices have dropped like a rock over the last 10 years. Life has improved. As a battery swap market matures with luck this will become more and more of a non-issue. Growing up, we generally put a sub 100k mile life span on vehicles. They were going to need substantial work to keep them going past that in any reliable way. Now we don't bat an eye at vehicles routinely lasting 300k.

Hopefully in 10 years we will be seeing 80% life left in batteries and swaps under 20% (maybe under 10%) of new car value. Plus swaps will hopefully be granting a new benefit - they will improve from the original.
---
I really don't want the worse of both worlds with a EREV. Needing to maintain an engine, reduced towing capacity, reduced electrical range. I have trouble believing it would be easier for Scout to start with the EREV. Really 2 major questions. Can Scout sell more BEV's than they can make out of the gate - then there is no real need to delay production of the BEV. If they can not sell them, then going with the Harvester first makes economic sense. Likewise, is there a technological reason to delay BEV production (needing time to get better batteries for instance). I guess there is a third reason, politics. Is a political reversal on credits expected just around the corner? Depending on when production actually starts, I could see waiting for an election.
I was with you until waiting for the election. If they are ready to go end of 2027, why would they have an idle factory for a year waiting for an election? Thats the only part I’m not quite seeing, but the rest I’m with you. I started all in on EREV and now am totally onboard with the BEV for all your stated reasons.

And if they did start with the BEV what about some sort of incentive for people to convert to the BEV. Doesn’t even necessarily have to be monetary. Maybe a special edition color that’s only available in the BEV, a BEV launch package that includes some free fun accessories. Something like that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: THil08 and maynard
It is true there is a LOT of battery anxiety. I am hoping that as the market matures, this will be reduced. Cell prices have dropped like a rock over the last 10 years. Life has improved. As a battery swap market matures with luck this will become more and more of a non-issue. Growing up, we generally put a sub 100k mile life span on vehicles. They were going to need substantial work to keep them going past that in any reliable way. Now we don't bat an eye at vehicles routinely lasting 300k.

Hopefully in 10 years we will be seeing 80% life left in batteries and swaps under 20% (maybe under 10%) of new car value. Plus swaps will hopefully be granting a new benefit - they will improve from the original.
---
I really don't want the worse of both worlds with a EREV. Needing to maintain an engine, reduced towing capacity, reduced electrical range. I have trouble believing it would be easier for Scout to start with the EREV. Really 2 major questions. Can Scout sell more BEV's than they can make out of the gate - then there is no real need to delay production of the BEV. If they can not sell them, then going with the Harvester first makes economic sense. Likewise, is there a technological reason to delay BEV production (needing time to get better batteries for instance). I guess there is a third reason, politics. Is a political reversal on credits expected just around the corner? Depending on when production actually starts, I could see waiting for an election.
Well I have good news for you then! EVs have been around for more than 15 years already so there's lots of data available on their longevity. It turns out they last well past "10 years" and the vast majority of 10 year old EVs have well above 80% life left. (https://electricautonomy.ca/ev-supply-chain/batteries/2024-09-18/ev-batteries-longevity-geotab-data/)

I myself bought a used EV that was five years old at the time, it's still going strong with its third owner and is now 14 years old.

Battery swaps aren't really a thing. Owners shouldn't expect to or need to replace EV batteries. For one if the battery does need to be replaced due to defects those will likely appear well within the 8 year/100,000 mile EV battery warranty period. Realistically EV batteries last the life of the vehicle if not longer as the linked article states. Battery replacements aren't really a thing anyone needs to worry about. That's a fossil industry myth that just refuses to die despite the overwhelming evidence that shows it's BS.
 
Well I have good news for you then! EVs have been around for more than 15 years already so there's lots of data available on their longevity. It turns out they last well past "10 years" and the vast majority of 10 year old EVs have well above 80% life left. (https://electricautonomy.ca/ev-supply-chain/batteries/2024-09-18/ev-batteries-longevity-geotab-data/)

I myself bought a used EV that was five years old at the time, it's still going strong with its third owner and is now 14 years old.

Battery swaps aren't really a thing. Owners shouldn't expect to or need to replace EV batteries. For one if the battery does need to be replaced due to defects those will likely appear well within the 8 year/100,000 mile EV battery warranty period. Realistically EV batteries last the life of the vehicle if not longer as the linked article states. Battery replacements aren't really a thing anyone needs to worry about. That's a fossil industry myth that just refuses to die despite the overwhelming evidence that shows it's BS.
Excellent. One less this to worry about. Thanks!!
 
I was with you until waiting for the election. If they are ready to go end of 2027, why would they have an idle factory for a year waiting for an election? Thats the only part I’m not quite seeing, but the rest I’m with you. I started all in on EREV and now am totally onboard with the BEV for all your stated reasons.

And if they did start with the BEV what about some sort of incentive for people to convert to the BEV. Doesn’t even necessarily have to be monetary. Maybe a special edition color that’s only available in the BEV, a BEV launch package that includes some free fun accessories. Something like that.
I can see the midterms next year being a big indicator on where things are headed and that could play a role in SM decision making but at $2B on the factory I just can’t see SM sitting on that and all reality is they are operating in the red right now so I don’t see VWAG wanting that clock ticking any longer than necessary. With BEV being the initial design and being the smaller batch of production I see logic in that starting first to gear up to speed then really start stamping out the EREVs but just my thinking knowing the real estate industry and what I know from my wife’s role in commercial bank lending.
 
I was with you until waiting for the election. If they are ready to go end of 2027, why would they have an idle factory for a year waiting for an election? Thats the only part I’m not quite seeing, but the rest I’m with you. I started all in on EREV and now am totally onboard with the BEV for all your stated reasons.

And if they did start with the BEV what about some sort of incentive for people to convert to the BEV. Doesn’t even necessarily have to be monetary. Maybe a special edition color that’s only available in the BEV, a BEV launch package that includes some free fun accessories. Something like that.
Yeah I agree on the election part. I think as long as people will buy them if they are ready to go in 2027 or early 2028 which I'm sure they will then it won't be an issue. If no one was willing to buy them until after the election that would be another thing but I don't see that happening. I'd be surprised even if there was a change at the election if EV tax credits or anything like that came back in anyways. Although if I buy mine and they come in afterwards I'll be annoyed as that's what happened when I bought my car in 2022 so I missed out on them back then.
 
  • Wow
  • Like
Reactions: maynard and J Alynn
Battery swaps aren't really a thing. Owners shouldn't expect to or need to replace EV batteries. For one if the battery does need to be replaced due to defects those will likely appear well within the 8 year/100,000 mile EV battery warranty period. Realistically EV batteries last the life of the vehicle if not longer as the linked article states. Battery replacements aren't really a thing anyone needs to worry about. That's a fossil industry myth that just refuses to die despite the overwhelming evidence that shows it's BS.

This. If you look at costs on ebay, whole EV batteries are incredibly cheap compared with the retail cost of batteries. And it’s because there’s no swap market for them—there’s no demand. They’re so cheap that buying them, pulling all the cells out and rearranging them into 48V, 3 kAh whole-home batteries is almost worth the effort.
 
This. If you look at costs on ebay, whole EV batteries are incredibly cheap compared with the retail cost of batteries. And it’s because there’s no swap market for them—there’s no demand. They’re so cheap that buying them, pulling all the cells out and rearranging them into 48V, 3 kAh whole-home batteries is almost worth the effort.
Replacement EV batteries are far from plug-and-play, DIY swap em in your garage replacement items. Sure, you can buy cells and packs and maybe an entire unit, but good luck swapping out any of those things in your EV if you need to. This is why full battery replacements are still five-figure costs.

Someday, recycling will be common, design-for-maintainability/serviceability will be table stakes, and the built in ability to upgrade battery or motor tech will be standard, maybe even with aftermarket options. But none of those things are common today - most EV service centers can't do it themselves now, vehicles have to be shipped to specially-configured locations.

When my first Polestar 2 got totaled, the battery pack was undamaged except for the auto main bus cutoff that got triggered - the battery pack was fine. I called COPART to see what they would do with it and they said nothing - it will get junked because there are no recycling or refurbishment centers that could handle it. The car had less than 3,500 miles on it.