Embrace the nuance Scout Padawans.We will support phone mirroring.
These companies require contracts and money to make official claims.
Embrace the nuance Scout Padawans.We will support phone mirroring.
These companies require contracts and money to make official claims.
What does that mean?We will support phone mirroring.
These companies require contracts and money to make official claims.
That you can't officially say you will have Carplay or Android Auto until you sign a contract with them and money changes hands.What does that mean?
Welcome to the community!The big reasons for CP/AA are really to get all of the phone apps/services you can't get native on the car. For example, Waze and YouTube Music
GotchaThat you can't officially say you will have Carplay or Android Auto until you sign a contract with them and money changes hands.
This is the way.That you can't officially say you will have Carplay or Android Auto until you sign a contract with them and money changes hands.
Is there an OEM UX other than CP/AA that supports OnX? It is so awesome off-road and in the woods and I don’t think I’m living in the past to say I want the same capability I have today.CP/AA is not needed on the Scout. It'll be based off the Rivian platform which is great. CP/AA is only worthwhile on old or mediocre OEM systems. People who want this on a Tesla, Rivian or Scout are living in the past.
There are several apps, OnX included that nobody else supports including Rivian and Tesla. Phone mirroring still makes a ton of sense because the app stores and developers are ALWAYS going to be way out ahead on those platforms.Is there an OEM UX other than CP/AA that supports OnX? It is so awesome off-road and in the woods and I don’t think I’m living in the past to say I want the same capability I have today.
I would be totally satisfied with phone mirroring- didn’t realize Rivian supported OnX- that’s awesome to know. I’m really struggling to Not go buy a Rivian and to hold off for the Scout.There are several apps, OnX included that nobody else supports including Rivian and Tesla. Phone mirroring still makes a ton of sense because the app stores and developers are ALWAYS going to be way out ahead on those platforms.
Just to be clear, Rivian does NOT support OnXI would be totally satisfied with phone mirroring- didn’t realize Rivian supported OnX- that’s awesome to know. I’m really struggling to Not go buy a Rivian and to hold off for the Scout.
I've always resisted the rush to apps for everything - this is a great example why. Simple homelink buttons in the mirror, buttons for the seat heaters, buttons and knobs for the hvac system - that way nobody needs a pin to ask their car to ask their phone to ask their Google Home for permission to enter their own house.Next week, I might take a break from my iPhone. While I was preparing for this, I realized I don't have a backup solution for my garage door. I use HomeKit through CarPlay to open and close my garage door since the Bolt doesn't have a Home button built in like our other cars, but they barely work (our garage door opener is buggy, even had it replaced, and it still acts the same to the physical openers). I learned Samsung Smart Things has a similar functionality, but might not be as elegant a solution compared to HomeKit, where the button appears as I get close to home. I know, as of last we heard, CarPlay is intended to make it to Scout, and I would hope the same can be said for Android Auto, but I would also like to see some native garage door control in the vehicle, either through software or a dedicated controller.
Edit: We have to use MyQ and Meross to control our door digitally, so we do have it setup with both Google Home and Alexa, the bolt has Alexa built in, but the issue with both of those is they require a pin, so while I can ask Alexa to open the door, it wants the pin and takes much longer because of it, so if it doesn't work on the first try it takes much longer to try and try again, HomeKit might take a couple of attempts, but the door is usually going to be open before I reach the driveway
Same. I put a new head unit in the Wrangler a few years ago. Also it’s super easy to add a backup camera to the Wranglers. They sell a bracket that attaches to the tire carrier and the camera perks out between the spokes on the spare. It’s not as fancy as a new car would have but it’s a backup camera and I’ll take it. I’m looking forward to the Scout and its mix of tech and buttons!I've always resisted the rush to apps for everything - this is a great example why. Simple homelink buttons in the mirror, buttons for the seat heaters, buttons and knobs for the hvac system - that way nobody needs a pin to ask their car to ask their phone to ask their Google Home for permission to enter their own house.
Ok, off my oldman soapbox: Phone mirroring for the win! I just put a new headunit in my aging Xterra with wireless "phone mirroring", and I use maps, Waze, OnX and Spotify with no issues or lagging. It's completely changed the driving experience for the better.
But I click a button to open the garage door![]()
Fully agreeI've always resisted the rush to apps for everything - this is a great example why. Simple homelink buttons in the mirror, buttons for the seat heaters, buttons and knobs for the hvac system - that way nobody needs a pin to ask their car to ask their phone to ask their Google Home for permission to enter their own house.
Ok, off my oldman soapbox: Phone mirroring for the win! I just put a new headunit in my aging Xterra with wireless "phone mirroring", and I use maps, Waze, OnX and Spotify with no issues or lagging. It's completely changed the driving experience for the better.
But I click a button to open the garage door![]()
That's the issue we face here at my house digital works 90% of the time 70% if it needs a pin, MyQ app directly works 100% of the time unless its fallen out of the plug (I need to replace it) but MyQ is only partnered with a few car brands so we need the Meross/homekit/Google stuff. on the other hand the physical buttons, both the standard openers, and homelink buttons in the Volt, Lacrosse and Chrysler work about 20-40% of the time, leading to mulitple presses and just being a headache and nothing changed after we had the unit replaced with a new one, so the model is just janky I guessSame. I put a new head unit in the Wrangler a few years ago. Also it’s super easy to add a backup camera to the Wranglers. They sell a bracket that attaches to the tire carrier and the camera perks out between the spokes on the spare. It’s not as fancy as a new car would have but it’s a backup camera and I’ll take it. I’m looking forward to the Scout and its mix of tech and buttons!
Sorry - this is a late reply to a statement made last Valentine's Day!CP/AA is not needed on the Scout. It'll be based off the Rivian platform which is great. CP/AA is only worthwhile on old or mediocre OEM systems. People who want this on a Tesla, Rivian or Scout are living in the past.
Right? I'm jealous of anyone that gets by without decent productivity apps and basic group messaging capability. I wish i could keep it that simple, but admittedly i live in my phone and "need" the power user stuff.Sorry - this is a late reply to a statement made last Valentine's Day!
While the Rivian platform is great, I would disagree with your statement on the grounds of NOT getting native app support for everything you get with ACP... If you got WAZE support, for example, natively integrated into the Rivian infotainment system, that would be awesome.
Without ACP, I still run WAZE in the background on my iPhone to this very day, 4+ years later.