5klbs towing cap with gas range extender?

  • From all of us at Scout Motors, welcome to the Scout Community! We created this community to provide Scout vehicle owners, enthusiasts, and curiosity seekers with a place to engage in discussion, suggestions, stories, and connections. Supportive communities are sometimes hard to find, but we're determined to turn this into one.

    Additionally, Scout Motors wants to hear your feedback and speak directly to the rabid community of owners as unique as America. We'll use the Scout Community to deliver news and information on events and launch updates directly to the group. Although the start of production is anticipated in 2026, many new developments and milestones will occur in the interim. We plan to share them with you on this site and look for your feedback and suggestions.

    How will the Scout Community be run? Think of it this way: this place is your favorite local hangout. We want you to enjoy the atmosphere, talk to people who share similar interests, request and receive advice, and generally have an enjoyable time. The Scout Community should be a highlight of your day. We want you to tell stories, share photos, spread your knowledge, and tell us how Scout can deliver great products and experiences. Along the way, Scout Motors will share our journey to production with you.

    Scout is all about respect. We respect our heritage. We respect the land and outdoors. We respect each other. Every person should feel safe, included, and welcomed in the Scout Community. Being kind and courteous to the other forum members is non-negotiable. Friendly debates are welcomed and often produce great outcomes, but we don't want things to get too rowdy. Please take a moment to consider what you post, especially if you think it may insult others. We'll do our best to encourage friendly discourse and to keep the discussions flowing.

    So, welcome to the Scout Community! We encourage you to check back regularly as we plan to engage our members, share teasers, and participate in discussions. The world needs Scouts™. Let's get going.


    We are Scout Motors.
My ideal and max load for the Terra Harvester model is pulling a 2500lb (fully loaded) camper with a 2 seater SxS on top of the truck with ramps for around 1200 - 1300lbs. This, unfortunately will not be realized if the towing capacity is cut to 5k while 10k seems to give me a decent buffer without maxing out the capacity. Not maxing is what is important for me because, Colorado.
Welcome and thanks for breaking in with your first post
 
EV towing is amazing, with range being the obvious exception. In my area, pull-thru chargers are few and far between so the Harvester option is a major selling factor for me. Hopeful that Scout can offer a tow package option with heavier rear springs or airbags to overcome the tongue weight impact of the rear engine/fuel tank. Even mid-size trucks are coming with 7500lb tow ratings these days, so 5k as speculated is going to be a deal-breaker.

20251008_181541.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: J Alynn
EV towing is amazing, with range being the obvious exception. In my area, pull-thru chargers are few and far between so the Harvester option is a major selling factor for me. Hopeful that Scout can offer a tow package option with heavier rear springs or airbags to overcome the tongue weight impact of the rear engine/fuel tank. Even mid-size trucks are coming with 7500lb tow ratings these days, so 5k as speculated is going to be a deal-breaker.

View attachment 14512
Welcome to the community!
 
  • Like
Reactions: maynard
EV towing is amazing, with range being the obvious exception. In my area, pull-thru chargers are few and far between so the Harvester option is a major selling factor for me. Hopeful that Scout can offer a tow package option with heavier rear springs or airbags to overcome the tongue weight impact of the rear engine/fuel tank. Even mid-size trucks are coming with 7500lb tow ratings these days, so 5k as speculated is going to be a deal-breaker.

View attachment 14512
Welcome to the big show and thanks for posting. Glad to have you participating in the forum! Happy Friday!
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyure and maynard
EV towing is amazing, with range being the obvious exception. In my area, pull-thru chargers are few and far between so the Harvester option is a major selling factor for me. Hopeful that Scout can offer a tow package option with heavier rear springs or airbags to overcome the tongue weight impact of the rear engine/fuel tank. Even mid-size trucks are coming with 7500lb tow ratings these days, so 5k as speculated is going to be a deal-breaker.

View attachment 14512
What range are you rated and what range do you see when towing that lovely boat? One of the things that kept me from taking the plunge on a Lightning was the video from TFL where it only went about 90 miles on a full charge.
 
What range are you rated and what range do you see when towing that lovely boat? One of the things that kept me from taking the plunge on a Lightning was the video from TFL where it only went about 90 miles on a full charge.
With this one I get about 110 mi (weighs ~6k with a full tank and all the gear inside), 98kW battery in the Lightning. Thankfully my local lake is 5 mi away and the river launch we like to go to is 35 mi out. I towed a SeaDoo pontoon last summer which was much lighter, but the square shape was like having a parachute and dropped me to about 80 mi at highway speeds. Aero make a big difference and this is all on generally flat lands.
Taking her up to Tahoe this summer which will be a 6500' climb, expecting to stop and charge once, maybe twice but the second location doesn't have a pull-thru. Curious to see how much regen I get on the drive back.
 
With this one I get about 110 mi (weighs ~6k with a full tank and all the gear inside), 98kW battery in the Lightning. Thankfully my local lake is 5 mi away and the river launch we like to go to is 35 mi out. I towed a SeaDoo pontoon last summer which was much lighter, but the square shape was like having a parachute and dropped me to about 80 mi at highway speeds. Aero make a big difference and this is all on generally flat lands.
Taking her up to Tahoe this summer which will be a 6500' climb, expecting to stop and charge once, maybe twice but the second location doesn't have a pull-thru. Curious to see how much regen I get on the drive back.
Note for those who aren’t familiar with the Lightning. The 98 kWh battery is the Standard Range battery, which gets approximately 240 miles EPA. The Extended Range battery (131 kWh) gets about 320 miles EPA.
 
  • Like
Reactions: maynard and J Alynn
With this one I get about 110 mi (weighs ~6k with a full tank and all the gear inside), 98kW battery in the Lightning. Thankfully my local lake is 5 mi away and the river launch we like to go to is 35 mi out. I towed a SeaDoo pontoon last summer which was much lighter, but the square shape was like having a parachute and dropped me to about 80 mi at highway speeds. Aero make a big difference and this is all on generally flat lands.
Taking her up to Tahoe this summer which will be a 6500' climb, expecting to stop and charge once, maybe twice but the second location doesn't have a pull-thru. Curious to see how much regen I get on the drive back.
At the time when the Lightning was really being reviewed I was working a job where I was towing my 16’ utility trailer nearly every day back and forth about 120 miles round trip, not counting small runoffs for materials/dump/etc. Knowing that I’d only be able to trickle on a 110v I just could not convince myself that the smaller pack would work for me, but wasn’t really convinced the bigger pack would work either.

Your comment about the aerodynamics of the trailer making a big difference reminds me of a video on YouTube I came across a while back where the guy did repeated runs in the Silverado EV and varied the trailer’s weight as well as aerodynamics and he found the aerodynamics played a significantly larger role in the efficiency than the weight. So much so, that the unladen with terrible aerodynamics was worse than the fully weighted trailer.
 
Your comment about the aerodynamics of the trailer making a big difference reminds me of a video on YouTube I came across a while back where the guy did repeated runs in the Silverado EV and varied the trailer’s weight as well as aerodynamics and he found the aerodynamics played a significantly larger role in the efficiency than the weight. So much so, that the unladen with terrible aerodynamics was worse than the fully weighted trailer.
Yes, definitely.

Aerodynamics are the most important consideration for efficiency while towing at any speed above about 30-35 mph. With trailer axle and tire rolling resistance the second consideration. Then you start to get to the less important things like weight.

Just think about it this way: A 10 pound, fully-deployed parachute that can stop a 150 mph stock car would be a lot more difficult to tow than a 5,000 pound trailer full of bricks.

Aerodynamics is one reason all manufacturers include a limit on the trailer's maximum forward-facing surface area in their towing guides. Most people don’t bother to read the stickers on their door jamb, much less the guides…

The reasons weight matters are: 1) thermal considerations; 2) starting and stopping; and 3) it’s an easy thing to talk about and to flex about. But apparently it’s much more difficult to say, “don’t tow a trailer with more than 60 square feet front surface area.”
 
Im with you...i think many are. This has to do with the positioning of the gas engine at the rear and the tongue weight. I think its inescapable and definitely has me rethinking the reservation type. Plus, with the delays, its quite possible that advances in batteries might nake the whole platform obsolete by the time it actually rolls out! Imagine they now take a couple extra years, or more, to finally roll out an erev that costs more and has less range and lower performance than a competitors bev...or thier own! And this after having spent those years tooling up for anticipated high erev uptake that does not materialize. This whole thing might just have gone the way of the ID buzz.
 
Im with you...i think many are. This has to do with the positioning of the gas engine at the rear and the tongue weight. I think its inescapable and definitely has me rethinking the reservation type. Plus, with the delays, its quite possible that advances in batteries might nake the whole platform obsolete by the time it actually rolls out! Imagine they now take a couple extra years, or more, to finally roll out an erev that costs more and has less range and lower performance than a competitors bev...or thier own! And this after having spent those years tooling up for anticipated high erev uptake that does not materialize. This whole thing might just have gone the way of the ID buzz.
Welcome to the community.
 
Im with you...i think many are. This has to do with the positioning of the gas engine at the rear and the tongue weight. I think its inescapable and definitely has me rethinking the reservation type. Plus, with the delays, its quite possible that advances in batteries might nake the whole platform obsolete by the time it actually rolls out! Imagine they now take a couple extra years, or more, to finally roll out an erev that costs more and has less range and lower performance than a competitors bev...or thier own! And this after having spent those years tooling up for anticipated high erev uptake that does not materialize. This whole thing might just have gone the way of the ID buzz.
Welcome to the forum and thanks for your contribution
 
The towing limitations of the Terra Harvester have me considering the Ram REV as another option. I’d just like to see Ram offer the REV with a Rebel setup on taller tires. The REV has potential, if Ram can pull it off!

IMG_0545.jpeg
IMG_0546.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: SrfnFly227
Im with you...i think many are. This has to do with the positioning of the gas engine at the rear and the tongue weight. I think its inescapable and definitely has me rethinking the reservation type. Plus, with the delays, its quite possible that advances in batteries might nake the whole platform obsolete by the time it actually rolls out! Imagine they now take a couple extra years, or more, to finally roll out an erev that costs more and has less range and lower performance than a competitors bev...or thier own! And this after having spent those years tooling up for anticipated high erev uptake that does not materialize. This whole thing might just have gone the way of the ID buzz.
Having driven EVs for 16 years now, I can tell you that the "next battery breakthrough" has been 2 years away that entire time. It's always just around the corner. Seriously, there is 0% chance there will be any advances in batteries in the next 2 years that will dethrone NMC/LFP in energy density at a reasonable cost.

Also, I recall Jamie saying that the limitation is currently more due to thermal management than tongue weight.

That being said, Ram is definitely out to build a towing machine. Scout is more of a lifestyle vehicle. I think if they can get the towing to 7k that will cover a huge number of people. My boat (Yamaha 242X) weighs 6k with the trailer. My WK Diesel is rated at 7,400lbs and tows the boat no problem. I am BEV so it won' t be an issue for me but if I was going Harvester I would like a 7k rating.
 
Having driven EVs for 16 years now, I can tell you that the "next battery breakthrough" has been 2 years away that entire time. It's always just around the corner. Seriously, there is 0% chance there will be any advances in batteries in the next 2 years that will dethrone NMC/LFP in energy density at a reasonable cost.

Also, I recall Jamie saying that the limitation is currently more due to thermal management than tongue weight.

That being said, Ram is definitely out to build a towing machine. Scout is more of a lifestyle vehicle. I think if they can get the towing to 7k that will cover a huge number of people. My boat (Yamaha 242X) weighs 6k with the trailer. My WK Diesel is rated at 7,400lbs and tows the boat no problem. I am BEV so it won' t be an issue for me but if I was going Harvester I would like a 7k ratingI think thats .
I think the heat issue is separate. I believe that they are having that issue but I don't think its related to the towing reduction! That's clearly tongue weight. Its physics and engine placement. I would argue that there have been many battery breakthroughs in the last 16 years... in energy density, materials , architecture and charging speeds. That being said, the battery they spec'd will still be viable as its already promised to have a lot of good qualities in those regards. However, the industry moves fast...just look at how quickly they are iterating in China while some analysts have estimated Scout might not even start delivering till 2030. Its not just what you deliver to market but also when. RivianR2 is coming out this year...R3 soon after, and other truck makers have viable platforms as well. If Scout enters a market already flooded with competitors that have bridged whatever gap Scout could have created, it will surely affect sales.
 
The towing limitations of the Terra Harvester have me considering the Ram REV as another option. I’d just like to see Ram offer the REV with a Rebel setup on taller tires. The REV has potential, if Ram can pull it off!

View attachment 15465View attachment 15466
If you need the towing capacity at that level, then that may be the better choice. Or, really, you should consider a medium- or heavy-duty truck. Let's also see where the Terra comes in when the dust settles.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyure