How Close Are We to Solid-State Batteries?
I always enjoy this person's videos.
I always enjoy this person's videos.
I like the final point: It doesn’t matter what the chemistry is as long as the promises are met. And as long as BEV manufacturers don’t hold off developing vehicles based on aspirational promises instead of existing technology.How Close Are We to Solid-State Batteries?
I always enjoy this person's videos.
That’s a good ideaOh well I hope SM has an event to reveal all the different trims etc. that would be great.
View attachment 11080
But you will still come on here and provide your insight and education and MATH right?!? You can’t abandon us!!I think Scout is safe from this because I think it’ll be the Hilux rather than the Tacoma, but...
If Toyota gets a BEV Tacoma with a 6-foot bed to market in the US before the Scout Traveler is available, we might end up trading the Mustang for the Tacoma. We’ll see.
I love this community. I’ll stay until I get r-u-n-n-o-f-t.But you will still come on here and provide your insight and education and MATH right?!? You can’t abandon us!!
If this turns out to be the case I may look harder again at the Harvester.<snip>
I wouldn’t be surprised if the base battery on the Scout is for a ~250-300 mile range, given the starting price of $60k. The 350 mile range may be with an “extended range” battery and run $75-80k.
<snip>
Great movie!I love this community. I’ll stay until I get r-u-n-n-o-f-t.
Is this a feeling based on evidence? What are other automakers doing that's worrying you? Competition improves the breed! No one is standing still and other companies are developing EREVs too. Scout will be nicely positioned with a rugged, off-road capable vehicle with real buttons, switches, and door handles. I think they're doing enough to stand out from the crowd.why do I have the feeling that we/scout is going to get smoked by Rivian and Toyota and others, just doesn't look good lately not much coming out while others are moving ahead
My only real worry atm, is that the battery size (capacity) seems a bit in the smaller size compared to its competitors and target range. Especially because it likely won’t break any aerodynamic recordswhy do I have the feeling that we/scout is going to get smoked by Rivian and Toyota and others, just doesn't look good lately not much coming out while others are moving ahead???
lol I have a 1978 SSII dont even think the word aerodynamic was around around back then....My only real worry atm, is that the battery size (capacity) seems a bit in the smaller size compared to its competitors and target range. Especially because it likely won’t break any aerodynamic records.
I didn’t realize people were considering this box on wheels for max efficiency. I see it as a scout that gets probably double the equivalent of the original Scouts and looks great doing it while hopefully being even more capable. While we had the Bronco my daughter was getting like 16mpg around campus in Texas on a brand new 2023 Bronco. I can live with better range than that on the new Scout while being 10% larger than the Broncoslol I have a 1978 SSII dont even think the word aerodynamic was around around back then....
Scout are moving forward at a more rapid pace than Rivian did at this stage in the company, thanks in large part to VW's and Rivian’s corporate and engineering help. The issue is that the field is a bit more crowded for Scout than it was for Rivian. So Scout needs to stick to what differentiates them from all the other players. This includes style, community, and capability.why do I have the feeling that we/scout is going to get smoked by Rivian and Toyota and others, just doesn't look good lately not much coming out while others are moving ahead???