Extra, Extra....Read All About It!

  • From all of us at Scout Motors, welcome to the Scout Community! We created this community to provide Scout vehicle owners, enthusiasts, and curiosity seekers with a place to engage in discussion, suggestions, stories, and connections. Supportive communities are sometimes hard to find, but we're determined to turn this into one.

    Additionally, Scout Motors wants to hear your feedback and speak directly to the rabid community of owners as unique as America. We'll use the Scout Community to deliver news and information on events and launch updates directly to the group. Although the start of production is anticipated in 2026, many new developments and milestones will occur in the interim. We plan to share them with you on this site and look for your feedback and suggestions.

    How will the Scout Community be run? Think of it this way: this place is your favorite local hangout. We want you to enjoy the atmosphere, talk to people who share similar interests, request and receive advice, and generally have an enjoyable time. The Scout Community should be a highlight of your day. We want you to tell stories, share photos, spread your knowledge, and tell us how Scout can deliver great products and experiences. Along the way, Scout Motors will share our journey to production with you.

    Scout is all about respect. We respect our heritage. We respect the land and outdoors. We respect each other. Every person should feel safe, included, and welcomed in the Scout Community. Being kind and courteous to the other forum members is non-negotiable. Friendly debates are welcomed and often produce great outcomes, but we don't want things to get too rowdy. Please take a moment to consider what you post, especially if you think it may insult others. We'll do our best to encourage friendly discourse and to keep the discussions flowing.

    So, welcome to the Scout Community! We encourage you to check back regularly as we plan to engage our members, share teasers, and participate in discussions. The world needs Scouts™. Let's get going.


    We are Scout Motors.
I think it depends on timing and what the used market looks like in my area, but have been eyeing up a Volvo C40 or possibly an Ioniq. I'd jump on a F150 if I could convince my wife lol.

Edit: forgot the ID4
I did finally find a deal for a used '24 Ranger with 25k miles left on the warranty for $15k less than a new one. Pretty stripped with almost no bells and whistles but at least I have a truck capable of my immediate needs for the moment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: THil08
Rivian Drops R1S and R1T Base Trims After LFP Battery Calibration Issues

Interesting, and not surprising.
This isn’t an impossible problem to solve, but it’s also a problem that requires some new ideas.

The standard for estimating battery state of charge (SOC) is the voltage. But the difference between an LFP cell voltage at very low SOC and 100% SOC is very small. So that standard doesn’t work well for automobiles—it’s fine in other applications. The standard for knowing the SOC to higher accuracy is counting coulombs. But the count isn’t perfect, so the method means SOC drifts based on use, so unless drivers are willing to drive down to very low SOC (5% or less) and then charge all the way up to 100% without using the battery, there’s no other great way to reset the drift.
 
Rivian Drops R1S and R1T Base Trims After LFP Battery Calibration Issues

Oh, I'd seen they were dropping it, but wasn't aware of the calibration issue. But it is a bit of a bummer, as I had actually somewhat considered an R1S for a while, and the Standard was going to be what I was going to go with, as it was the only one even sort of close to the price point I wanted.

I understand the need to differentiate between the R1 and R2 series, but personally I'd have been quite happy with a de-contented R1S. Removing things like the electronically controlled HVAC (even the vents and where they are positioned/blow air is controlled via touchscreen and electronics), the electric releases for the center console, the doors, etc. Then of course a bit less fancy on the inside.

But I suppose that won't happen now (or possibly ever), because of the R2.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MasterSpam
Interesting, and not surprising.
This isn’t an impossible problem to solve, but it’s also a problem that requires some new ideas.

The standard for estimating battery state of charge (SOC) is the voltage. But the difference between an LFP cell voltage at very low SOC and 100% SOC is very small. So that standard doesn’t work well for automobiles—it’s fine in other applications. The standard for knowing the SOC to higher accuracy is counting coulombs. But the count isn’t perfect, so the method means SOC drifts based on use, so unless drivers are willing to drive down to very low SOC (5% or less) and then charge all the way up to 100% without using the battery, there’s no other great way to reset the drift.
I guess charging to 100% will reset the drift - but not account for any lost capacity (which is a second issue).
 
  • Like
Reactions: MasterSpam
I guess charging to 100% will reset the drift - but not account for any lost capacity (which is a second issue).
Yeah, that’s a separate issue. And the LFP batteries are more resilient to long-term capacity loss compared with NMC, but honestly, even the 2000 cycle lifetime of NMC is more than enough. An NMC battery’s 2000 cycles on a Scout will mean 700,000 miles, or 38 years if cycled once a week before it’s down to 70%-80% capacity.

The tracking algorithms for the battery state of health are patented, proprietary, and…wrong but good enough.
(All models are wrong, but some are useful. — George Box, 1987)

Because the variety of algorithms there is now an SAE standard in the works (J3257). Similar to the wild claims of towing capacity up until the mid 2000s, it’s time for a standardized way of determining the state of health of an EV (PHEV, EREV, BEV) battery.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyure
  • Like
Reactions: cyure