Bigger Gas Tank - 15 Gallons is Abysmal

  • From all of us at Scout Motors, welcome to the Scout Community! We created this community to provide Scout vehicle owners, enthusiasts, and curiosity seekers with a place to engage in discussion, suggestions, stories, and connections. Supportive communities are sometimes hard to find, but we're determined to turn this into one.

    Additionally, Scout Motors wants to hear your feedback and speak directly to the rabid community of owners as unique as America. We'll use the Scout Community to deliver news and information on events and launch updates directly to the group. Although the start of production is anticipated in 2026, many new developments and milestones will occur in the interim. We plan to share them with you on this site and look for your feedback and suggestions.

    How will the Scout Community be run? Think of it this way: this place is your favorite local hangout. We want you to enjoy the atmosphere, talk to people who share similar interests, request and receive advice, and generally have an enjoyable time. The Scout Community should be a highlight of your day. We want you to tell stories, share photos, spread your knowledge, and tell us how Scout can deliver great products and experiences. Along the way, Scout Motors will share our journey to production with you.

    Scout is all about respect. We respect our heritage. We respect the land and outdoors. We respect each other. Every person should feel safe, included, and welcomed in the Scout Community. Being kind and courteous to the other forum members is non-negotiable. Friendly debates are welcomed and often produce great outcomes, but we don't want things to get too rowdy. Please take a moment to consider what you post, especially if you think it may insult others. We'll do our best to encourage friendly discourse and to keep the discussions flowing.

    So, welcome to the Scout Community! We encourage you to check back regularly as we plan to engage our members, share teasers, and participate in discussions. The world needs Scouts™. Let's get going.


    We are Scout Motors.

Demlockian

Member
Jul 1, 2025
7
7
New Mexico
First, let's review battery basics, as I understand them: for optimal daily use, electric vehicles (EVs) are generally recommended to stay within an 80% maximum State of Charge (SOC) and avoid consistently dropping below a 20% minimum SOC.

To maximize the longevity of an electric vehicle's battery, a practical guideline is to consider approximately 60% of the battery capacity as the usable range for daily driving. This stems from adhering to an 80% SOC upper limit for and avoiding consistently dropping below a 20% SOC, which minimizes battery stress and degradation.

Realistic Driving Use Case

With an effective 60% SOC window the Harvester's 150-mile range translates to roughly 90 miles of usable range. This effectively addresses the daily driving needs of average commuters, as urban commuters typically travel 20-30 miles round trip (leaving approximately 65 miles of extra range) and rural commuters travel 40-60 miles (leaving around 40 miles of extra range).

For longer journeys, the Harvester's ability to add 300 miles (stopping at 1/6 tank remaining) of range (23.3 MPG) is invaluable. Considering that the average long-distance family road trip is roughly 750 miles (per ChatGPT), and the Scout with the Harvester can travel approximately 390 miles before refueling, a single 15-gallon refill extends the range to 690 miles, enabling completion of the average road trip with just two stops.

However, range is significantly impacted when towing a trailer. According to ChatGPT, towing at 70% of a vehicle's maximum capacity can reduce range by approximately 40%. This would decrease the EV range to around 55 miles and the gasoline range to 175 miles (accounting the same 1/6 remainder stop), resulting in a total of 230 miles per cycle. Therefore, completing a 750-mile trip would require refueling the Harvester approximately four or five times, considering that only 175 miles of range are added with each gasoline refuel.

In contrast, a Ford F-150 with a 3.5L EcoBoost engine achieves an estimated 22 MPG on the highway and has a 36-gallon fuel tank, translating to a towing range of nearly 395 miles per refueling stop (stopping at the same 1/6 tank remainder). This enables the F-150 to complete the same 750-mile trip with half (or fewer) the refueling stops compared to a Scout Terra equipped with the Harvester while towing.

All of this is to say that the 15-gallon proposed gas tank size is severely inadequate for real world towing applications. To be comparable, the Harvester needs an optional 25-gallon or larger tank. The 25-gallon tank option would raise the initial range to nearly 600 miles useable, which competes with similar trucks in the segment. Furthermore, it increases the standard towing refuel range from 175 (abysmal) to nearly 300 miles (acceptable). Bigger would still be preferred personally.

Generator Use
It's hard to speculate how long the Harvester would last in generator mode without further details, but let's do some shade tree math here. A 10kW gasoline generator uses about 2.5 gallons of fuel per hour at full load. According to ChatGPT, the average single occurrence power outage is roughly 2.5 hours, allowing the 15 gallon tank to be adequate (only used 6.25 gallons). However, in coastal areas power outages can be upwards of 72 hours due to large storms. With an upgraded 25-gallon tank, the homeowner (or renter) would have 10 hours of uninterrupted service, enough to sleep through the night comfortably (the 15-gallon tank only provides 6 hours).
 
Upvote 0
Great point about relying on the battery before the generator takes over. I should have been clearer that I was referring to the generator’s performance once the battery is depleted. That said, as I mentioned, the average duration is only about 2.5 hours, which the battery alone should easily handle.

However, I don’t think it’s realistic for homeowners in areas prone to long outages—like those caused by hurricanes—to count on the Harvester for week-long scenarios. It seems best suited for typical outage situations where power is usually restored within 24 hours. I say this mainly as why would I put wear and tear on a ~$80K truck vs ~$1K generator setup.

Even when the battery is depleted, you still get the benefit of having the battery in an EREV. That is why I made the point about total run time of the generator. If you were in a power outage situation and started with a depleted battery in the Harvester, you would still have about two days of power available while only needing to run the generator for five hours. That is what makes the configuration so exceptional and why a 15 gallon tank for gas is plenty when using the EREV to provide backup power during an outage.

I agree, "homeowners in areas prone to long outages" would be much better off with a static backup solution rather than relying on a vehicle of any kind. But as the YouTuber proves from his testing, having a battery provide power for the duration and only running a generator when necessary is much more efficient then just using a generator.
 
I appreciate seeing a post that recognizes that there are many of us who have been on here for a long time and are indeed passionate for the new Scouts. I try on a regular basis to greet as many new members as I can, sometimes I miss a new name. I try on a regular basis to post new threads to gain interest from different points of view-design, community, engineering, etc… my goal is to try and offer viewpoints that encourage “sideline” members to jump in because maybe they have a unique interest and perhaps something I post encourages them to join a conversation.

Admittedly, there are the occasional posts that do get me heated and the forum is certainly just that-a place to discuss opinions and engage people in passionate conversation. But it is also a place to help guide SM.

I’ve never wanted someone to leave this community because of an opinion I had to offer-be it positive or negative. In 2-1/2 years I’ve regularly had people dump on my ideas and so long as they weren’t being completely inappropriate I accepted it. So if Ive made a person feel unwelcome I apologize as that is pretty much the opposite of what I’ve tried to do with my time on this forum.

If there are ways “veteran” members can do more I’m completely for trying. What I have noticed ( as I’ve watched the past two days), as I feel @Chuckles noticed and commented on is there does seem to be a group of about 15 to 20 folks who post regularly, myself included, and it covers all sorts of topics. What I don’t know is what we can do to get newer members and watchers to join the conversations. Sometimes I feel like if the 15-20 or so regulars didn’t comment and post there wouldn’t be much activity. As a side note-I spent 1-1/2 years on the sidelines of the Bronco6G forum and often felt like I couldn’t jump in because I was out of the loop. (Ironically that is also where I learned about this forum and the new Scout venture). I saw the same regular names commenting on that forum so I understand people’s hesitations but at the same time I feel like I’ve met some great connections here and that is what makes me want to jump on here each day and see what’s new. I also like to try adding new threads as I mentioned above. I’ll go so far as to say I’ve DM’d several members here and there because we have something in common or we hung out at the reveal and I enjoyed chatting but I don’t want to talk personal things when we are on here for Scouts. And now we chat regularly which is cool. I’ve also had a number of members DM me to ask questions or get my take on something. With both these scenarios I feel like the forum has succeeded as it is building community. All I can offer is jump in and join a conversation and like @Chuckles implied-find your passion and join a conversation.
Thank you for the heartfelt posting.

And one of the easiest ways a new member can get engaged is search a topic of interest old or new and reply. Because when you do it bubbles up to the top in the “New Posts” where all members can continue the conversation.
 
First, let's review battery basics, as I understand them: for optimal daily use, electric vehicles (EVs) are generally recommended to stay within an 80% maximum State of Charge (SOC) and avoid consistently dropping below a 20% minimum SOC.

To maximize the longevity of an electric vehicle's battery, a practical guideline is to consider approximately 60% of the battery capacity as the usable range for daily driving. This stems from adhering to an 80% SOC upper limit for and avoiding consistently dropping below a 20% SOC, which minimizes battery stress and degradation.

Realistic Driving Use Case

With an effective 60% SOC window the Harvester's 150-mile range translates to roughly 90 miles of usable range. This effectively addresses the daily driving needs of average commuters, as urban commuters typically travel 20-30 miles round trip (leaving approximately 65 miles of extra range) and rural commuters travel 40-60 miles (leaving around 40 miles of extra range).

For longer journeys, the Harvester's ability to add 300 miles (stopping at 1/6 tank remaining) of range (23.3 MPG) is invaluable. Considering that the average long-distance family road trip is roughly 750 miles (per ChatGPT), and the Scout with the Harvester can travel approximately 390 miles before refueling, a single 15-gallon refill extends the range to 690 miles, enabling completion of the average road trip with just two stops.

However, range is significantly impacted when towing a trailer. According to ChatGPT, towing at 70% of a vehicle's maximum capacity can reduce range by approximately 40%. This would decrease the EV range to around 55 miles and the gasoline range to 175 miles (accounting the same 1/6 remainder stop), resulting in a total of 230 miles per cycle. Therefore, completing a 750-mile trip would require refueling the Harvester approximately four or five times, considering that only 175 miles of range are added with each gasoline refuel.

In contrast, a Ford F-150 with a 3.5L EcoBoost engine achieves an estimated 22 MPG on the highway and has a 36-gallon fuel tank, translating to a towing range of nearly 395 miles per refueling stop (stopping at the same 1/6 tank remainder). This enables the F-150 to complete the same 750-mile trip with half (or fewer) the refueling stops compared to a Scout Terra equipped with the Harvester while towing.

All of this is to say that the 15-gallon proposed gas tank size is severely inadequate for real world towing applications. To be comparable, the Harvester needs an optional 25-gallon or larger tank. The 25-gallon tank option would raise the initial range to nearly 600 miles useable, which competes with similar trucks in the segment. Furthermore, it increases the standard towing refuel range from 175 (abysmal) to nearly 300 miles (acceptable). Bigger would still be preferred personally.

Generator Use
It's hard to speculate how long the Harvester would last in generator mode without further details, but let's do some shade tree math here. A 10kW gasoline generator uses about 2.5 gallons of fuel per hour at full load. According to ChatGPT, the average single occurrence power outage is roughly 2.5 hours, allowing the 15 gallon tank to be adequate (only used 6.25 gallons). However, in coastal areas power outages can be upwards of 72 hours due to large storms. With an upgraded 25-gallon tank, the homeowner (or renter) would have 10 hours of uninterrupted service, enough to sleep through the night comfortably (the 15-gallon tank only provides 6 hours).
I don’t disagree with you but there are probably packaging constraints given all the kit for both the EV and the generator. I guess that’s why they have the gas container on the back, I assume it’s at least 5-10gallons
 
I appreciate seeing a post that recognizes that there are many of us who have been on here for a long time and are indeed passionate for the new Scouts. I try on a regular basis to greet as many new members as I can, sometimes I miss a new name. I try on a regular basis to post new threads to gain interest from different points of view-design, community, engineering, etc… my goal is to try and offer viewpoints that encourage “sideline” members to jump in because maybe they have a unique interest and perhaps something I post encourages them to join a conversation.

Admittedly, there are the occasional posts that do get me heated and the forum is certainly just that-a place to discuss opinions and engage people in passionate conversation. But it is also a place to help guide SM.

I’ve never wanted someone to leave this community because of an opinion I had to offer-be it positive or negative. In 2-1/2 years I’ve regularly had people dump on my ideas and so long as they weren’t being completely inappropriate I accepted it. So if Ive made a person feel unwelcome I apologize as that is pretty much the opposite of what I’ve tried to do with my time on this forum.

If there are ways “veteran” members can do more I’m completely for trying. What I have noticed ( as I’ve watched the past two days), as I feel @Chuckles noticed and commented on is there does seem to be a group of about 15 to 20 folks who post regularly, myself included, and it covers all sorts of topics. What I don’t know is what we can do to get newer members and watchers to join the conversations. Sometimes I feel like if the 15-20 or so regulars didn’t comment and post there wouldn’t be much activity. As a side note-I spent 1-1/2 years on the sidelines of the Bronco6G forum and often felt like I couldn’t jump in because I was out of the loop. (Ironically that is also where I learned about this forum and the new Scout venture). I saw the same regular names commenting on that forum so I understand people’s hesitations but at the same time I feel like I’ve met some great connections here and that is what makes me want to jump on here each day and see what’s new. I also like to try adding new threads as I mentioned above. I’ll go so far as to say I’ve DM’d several members here and there because we have something in common or we hung out at the reveal and I enjoyed chatting but I don’t want to talk personal things when we are on here for Scouts. And now we chat regularly which is cool. I’ve also had a number of members DM me to ask questions or get my take on something. With both these scenarios I feel like the forum has succeeded as it is building community. All I can offer is jump in and join a conversation and like @Chuckles implied-find your passion and join a conversation.
I get what you’re saying, especially about the Bronco forum and being on the sideline. I read a lot of the posts, and look for certain user names, but I don’t post much because I was never a Scout person from back in the day, and honestly, I’m not a big fan of EV’s. Scout has done something different with the Harvester, and I’m just sitting back and trying to learn more. I’d say it’s 50/50 at best if I move forward with my reservation, but I’ve enjoyed checking in and learning what I can.
 
I get what you’re saying, especially about the Bronco forum and being on the sideline. I read a lot of the posts, and look for certain user names, but I don’t post much because I was never a Scout person from back in the day, and honestly, I’m not a big fan of EV’s. Scout has done something different with the Harvester, and I’m just sitting back and trying to learn more. I’d say it’s 50/50 at best if I move forward with my reservation, but I’ve enjoyed checking in and learning what I can.
I would guess it is a challenge based on your user name and what you’ve experienced from a 2500 series truck which is significantly different than the Terra will be. If you are ready to make the leap that’s great and I applaud it. But you know what a 2500 is capable of from a towing perspective-because that’s what 2500’s are built for. I hope you stick with it and wait to see the final specs as even I hesitate some times. With all the new EV rollbacks even I spent some time this weekend debating if I should consider the harvester instead of BEV. But with my wife having the brand new Pilot as a 3-row I’m covered if we choose to long distance drive. Time will tell for all of us
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyure


All of this is to say that the 15-gallon proposed gas tank size is severely inadequate for real world towing applications. To be comparable, the Harvester needs an optional 25-gallon or larger tank. The 25-gallon tank option would raise the initial range to nearly 600 miles useable, which competes with similar trucks in the segment. Furthermore, it increases the standard towing refuel range from 175 (abysmal) to nearly 300 miles (acceptable). Bigger would still be preferred personally.

You make some good points. However I had trouble staying in the seat for 300 miles when I was 20, let alone now. I support the larger tank idea, but there may be space constraints.
 
  • Like
Reactions: J Alynn
…Many members of this forum are already enthusiastic about electric vehicles and may not have much interest in gasoline options…

It’s interesting, when i first saw the announcement about Scout I thought, “How awesome, I want one”. That it was going to be an EV “ICK”. And, “a hybrid like my Avalon would be ok.” After seeing the Jay Leno’s Garage piece I started investigating and soon found the roll out videos. That’s when I started getting excited! I’ve had to unlearn a lot of assumptions about the state of public and private EV charging, and the industry in general. After all, how do you top a 345/4-speed? (My second Scout).

It’s obvious that battery and charging technology is advancing at warp speed. Who knows what’s available in two years? I reserved my Terra Harvester in May.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyure
Thank you for the heartfelt posting.

And one of the easiest ways a new member can get engaged is search a topic of interest old or new and reply. Because when you do it bubbles up to the top in the “New Posts” where all members can continue the conversation.
Yes, I’ve been trying to follow this approach. My normal reaction is to jump in and ask the first question that comes to mind, oblivious to any previous discussion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: J Alynn
It’s interesting, when i first saw the announcement about Scout I thought, “How awesome, I want one”. That it was going to be an EV “ICK”. And, “a hybrid like my Avalon would be ok.” After seeing the Jay Leno’s Garage piece I started investigating and soon found the roll out videos. That’s when I started getting excited! I’ve had to unlearn a lot of assumptions about the state of public and private EV charging, and the industry in general. After all, how do you top a 345/4-speed? (My second Scout).

It’s obvious that battery and charging technology is advancing at warp speed. Who knows what’s available in two years? I reserved my Terra Harvester in May.
It’s so funny I think-for those of us that owned scouts at some point in our lives. Oh how I miss that 345-when mine departed (at age 17) it had dual glass pack mufflers (if those are even considered mufflers 🤣) and it was ever 17 year old guy’s dream. I was completely bummed when I found the forum and learned it was EV-probably much like yourself based on your post. But 2-1/2 years of a TON of info from a TON of knowledgeable EV owners I have learned so much. 1-1/2 years ago I bought my Accord hybrid (similar to you as well😀) and have found that I like hybrids enough to go a step further and gamble on a full EV. I overcame my fear of a hybrid and now I love the economy of it and driving dynamics seem similar enough. I’m gonna gamble and jump in the deep end of EV’s and take a chance. EV may not be for everyone but much like your statements-I believe the same so I’ll take a chance. NOW-that said, if the Harvester comes out of the gate first I will likely go EREV because 4-1/2 years is a long wait and I will likely jump at whatever comes out of the gate first 🤣
 
It’s so funny I think-for those of us that owned scouts at some point in our lives. Oh how I miss that 345-when mine departed (at age 17) it had dual glass pack mufflers (if those are even considered mufflers 🤣) and it was ever 17 year old guy’s dream. I was completely bummed when I found the forum and learned it was EV-probably much like yourself based on your post. But 2-1/2 years of a TON of info from a TON of knowledgeable EV owners I have learned so much. 1-1/2 years ago I bought my Accord hybrid (similar to you as well😀) and have found that I like hybrids enough to go a step further and gamble on a full EV. I overcame my fear of a hybrid and now I love the economy of it and driving dynamics seem similar enough. I’m gonna gamble and jump in the deep end of EV’s and take a chance. EV may not be for everyone but much like your statements-I believe the same so I’ll take a chance. NOW-that said, if the Harvester comes out of the gate first I will likely go EREV because 4-1/2 years is a long wait and I will likely jump at whatever comes out of the gate first 🤣
Ha! Are glass packs a thing anymore. My first car was a 1974 Z28 350 4 speed with dual glass packs. Everyone knows when you arrive that’s for sure.

This has made me think of a question. I just saw they recalled the Dodge Charger EV because it’s not loud enough. I haven’t really paid attention to EVs. What’s the rules on how loud they have to be. There’s tons of Teslas and Rivians in town and I don’t recall them making any noise in particular.
 
Story time re multiple posts about using jerry cans to add range to a Harvester equipped vehicle. My Wrangler has a 20 gal tank and gets 11mpg on it's best day, normally more like 8mpg when overlanding and probably 2 mpg when rock crawling. I had a custom rear bumper and swing out tire carrier fabricated a long time ago with a mount for a traditional metal 5 gal jerry can. Every wheeling or camping trip I went on, that Jerry can went with me. And I used it a lot...because otherwise the gas in it would sit for so long it would go bad. I don't think I ever had to use it to get off the trail. Years later, when participating in the Parker Desert Splash out near lake Havasu, I got caught down in a boulder strewn gully and totally crunched the mount on a rock outcropping while extricating myself (the Jerry can was thankfully not in it's mount otherwise things would have gone much differently). I decided to cut the mount off instead of having it fabricated back into existence. That said, I still have the jerry can and no way in hell I'd put it inside the Traveler for a trip. It seems that the newer style tanks like Rotopax would be the way to go, as seen in some of the Traveler imaging that's been shared with us, but I am not sure I'd ever really need it.

In fact the only thing I can think of in my personal use case for the Traveler Harvester I've reserved would be if I was trying to get some long distance from home while towing, and just decided to refuel myself on the side of the road. But then, realistically, I'd only get, an extra ~35 miles out of a 2.5 gal Rotopax when towing.
 
I would guess it is a challenge based on your user name and what you’ve experienced from a 2500 series truck which is significantly different than the Terra will be. If you are ready to make the leap that’s great and I applaud it. But you know what a 2500 is capable of from a towing perspective-because that’s what 2500’s are built for. I hope you stick with it and wait to see the final specs as even I hesitate some times. With all the new EV rollbacks even I spent some time this weekend debating if I should consider the harvester instead of BEV. But with my wife having the brand new Pilot as a 3-row I’m covered if we choose to long distance drive. Time will tell for all of us
My user name is really not all that deep. It comes from a lack of creativity back when I joined Dodge Talk and had a 2004 Ram 2500 Hemi. Again, I’m not that deep. Between that truck and now I’ve had a 2012 Ram Power Wagon (3/4 ton frame), a 2020 Ford Raptor, and now my Ram TRX. I’ve also had a 2010 Chevy Camaro SS and a 2016 Dodge Challenger Hellcat. In that time my wife had a 2004 Honda Accord, a 2009 Honda Pilot, and now a 2019 Chevy Colorado ZR2.

I can’t see myself ever going full EV. I just am not comfortable with the charging infrastructure, especially here in Montana (I’ve mentioned that more than once). The Harvester seems like a great setup for folks like me. EV for day to day commute, and the range extender for longer trips. The Scout vehicles currently shown are attractive, and pretty exciting. I’m excited to see where Scout goes from here. Even if I don’t buy one, I’m always going to be a fan of this new lineup.
 
My user name is really not all that deep. It comes from a lack of creativity back when I joined Dodge Talk and had a 2004 Ram 2500 Hemi. Again, I’m not that deep. Between that truck and now I’ve had a 2012 Ram Power Wagon (3/4 ton frame), a 2020 Ford Raptor, and now my Ram TRX. I’ve also had a 2010 Chevy Camaro SS and a 2016 Dodge Challenger Hellcat. In that time my wife had a 2004 Honda Accord, a 2009 Honda Pilot, and now a 2019 Chevy Colorado ZR2.

I can’t see myself ever going full EV. I just am not comfortable with the charging infrastructure, especially here in Montana (I’ve mentioned that more than once). The Harvester seems like a great setup for folks like me. EV for day to day commute, and the range extender for longer trips. The Scout vehicles currently shown are attractive, and pretty exciting. I’m excited to see where Scout goes from here. Even if I don’t buy one, I’m always going to be a fan of this new lineup.
I share your discomfort with the state of public charging, that had a lot to do with my less than positive attitude toward EV’s. However this does seem to be changing.