Self-driving integration with Open Pilot.

  • From all of us at Scout Motors, welcome to the Scout Community! We created this community to provide Scout vehicle owners, enthusiasts, and curiosity seekers with a place to engage in discussion, suggestions, stories, and connections. Supportive communities are sometimes hard to find, but we're determined to turn this into one.

    Additionally, Scout Motors wants to hear your feedback and speak directly to the rabid community of owners as unique as America. We'll use the Scout Community to deliver news and information on events and launch updates directly to the group. Although the start of production is anticipated in 2026, many new developments and milestones will occur in the interim. We plan to share them with you on this site and look for your feedback and suggestions.

    How will the Scout Community be run? Think of it this way: this place is your favorite local hangout. We want you to enjoy the atmosphere, talk to people who share similar interests, request and receive advice, and generally have an enjoyable time. The Scout Community should be a highlight of your day. We want you to tell stories, share photos, spread your knowledge, and tell us how Scout can deliver great products and experiences. Along the way, Scout Motors will share our journey to production with you.

    Scout is all about respect. We respect our heritage. We respect the land and outdoors. We respect each other. Every person should feel safe, included, and welcomed in the Scout Community. Being kind and courteous to the other forum members is non-negotiable. Friendly debates are welcomed and often produce great outcomes, but we don't want things to get too rowdy. Please take a moment to consider what you post, especially if you think it may insult others. We'll do our best to encourage friendly discourse and to keep the discussions flowing.

    So, welcome to the Scout Community! We encourage you to check back regularly as we plan to engage our members, share teasers, and participate in discussions. The world needs Scouts™. Let's get going.


    We are Scout Motors.

MicroBiom

Active member
Feb 7, 2025
37
15
Huntsville Alabama
Scout should really look into integrating Open Pilot for self-driving. They're the second largest automated driving system behind Tesla. They should work with them so that we don't have to pay a subscription for it and we have integrated self-driving without having to purchase a Comma 3x device. Would be the cheapest way for Scout Motors to do this as well.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: oldgeeksguide
Already lots of discussions on this if you do some searching. Scout is touted as a connection machine. It is about hands on. It’s about adventure. Maybe down the road but the established consensus is No self driving. It’s not what the overwhelming Scout community wants. It’s about the hands on experience. Just an FYI

But the forum is open so we will all have opinions unique to ourselves!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scoutsie and cyure
Already lots of discussions on this if you do some searching. Scout is touted as a connection machine. It is about hands on. It’s about adventure. Maybe down the road but the established consensus is No self driving. It’s not what the overwhelming Scout community wants. It’s about the hands on experience. Just an FYI

But the forum is open so we will all have opinions unique to ourselves!
Really? There are discussions about open pilot being native? I don't think you've done your research. First of all this is a VW/rivian/"scout" it's not a scout. I've owned international scouts, this is not the same thing, never will be. You know what they want to do? Sell vehicles. You know what I want? An electric platform that has a four cylinder generator that's hopefully comfortable and easy to work on. One that doesn't cost a fortune. We'll see if scout can do that because nobody else has so far. They've all over promised and under delivered. I also drive 6,000 miles a month so I would like self-driving. The first platform that gets me what I need, is who gets my money. If you don't want self-driving, don't use it pretty simple. But I can tell you this if they don't come up with self-driving they just spent a lot of money for nothing. You are the minority in the population and that minority is shrinking. It would be a waste of billions of dollars if they don't compete in today/tomorrow market with the options that everyone else has and are coming out with.
 
Last edited:
Really? There are discussions about open pilot being native? I don't think you've done your research. First of all this is a VW/rivian/"scout" it's not a scout. I've owned international scouts, this is not the same thing, never will be. You know what they want to do? Sell vehicles. You know what I want? An electric platform that has a four cylinder generator that's hopefully comfortable and easy to work on. One that doesn't cost a fortune. We'll see if scout can do that because nobody else has so far. They've all over promised and under delivered. I also drive 6,000 miles a month so I would like self-driving. The first platform that gets me what I need, is who gets my money. If you don't want self-driving, don't use it pretty simple. But I can tell you this if they don't come up with self-driving they just spent a lot of money for nothing. You are the minority in the population and that minority is shrinking. It would be a waste of billions of dollars if they don't compete in today/tomorrow market with the options that everyone else has and are coming out with.
You seem to enjoy hitting me aggressively as is your right. I’ve been on here for a very long time and just conveying the conversations on this forum. We are each permitted to have opinions but this is a vehicle capable of off-roading at its core. If SM wanted an automous vehicle I don’t think their public face would be so strongly positioned toward connection to the vehicle. And after two solid years of a very solid early marketing campaign one would think they might have mentioned that by now! I think a Tesla might be your best bet but your vehicle-your choice.
 
Already lots of discussions on this if you do some searching. Scout is touted as a connection machine. It is about hands on. It’s about adventure. Maybe down the road but the established consensus is No self driving. It’s not what the overwhelming Scout community wants. It’s about the hands on experience. Just an FYI

But the forum is open so we will all have opinions unique to ourselves!
I completely agree and that’s what drew me to Scout. Self driving has never been on my radar and I wouldn’t buy it even if it was offered.

But that’s the beauty of this forum we all have our own opinions and can have an open exchange of ideas.
 
Yeah it's called marketing. They're trying to not be like everyone else. Even though they're like everyone else. The best thing they could do is produce a vehicle they say they're going to produce at the price they say they're going to produce it at. And once again if you think that people that just want an off-road vehicle are going to support this entire company you're completely dead wrong. I ordered a tara. Because a truck should be for working. I drive a lot and I need a truck. I also don't want to spend a bunch of money on gas. Diesel electric or gas electric is the most efficient way to run an electric platform. I've been waiting for them to finally produce something. We've been doing it in trains for a hundred years. Sometimes I want to drive. A lot of times I don't. And open pilot is open source so they don't have to do any of the work. They just should work with them to set cameras up so that we can install open pilot and it will work perfectly. If they're smart that's what they'll do. If they're not they'll go bankrupt. Because they'll produce something that cost more than people want to pay for more than they promise for. And then everyone will cancel their pre-orders just like every other vehicle maker in this country. Same reason I canceled my F-150 electric order. Same reason I canceled my cyber truck order. They can't produce the mileage they promised or at the price they promised it for. Just stating the facts in a very factual way. Nothing aggressive about it. Ha ha
 
I completely agree and that’s what drew me to Scout. Self driving has never been on my radar and I wouldn’t buy it even if it was offered.

But that’s the beauty of this forum we all have our own opinions and can have an open exchange of ideas.
That's why Open Pilot would be a great. Because you don't have to install the software if you don't want to. I find that people that don't drive very often and I've never used any sort of driver assistance because they drive all the time don't want self-driving. I used to say why would I ever want self-driving. Now that I drive as much as I do I want it more than ever. Things change. Nice to have options.
 
Last edited:
That's why I open pilot would be a great. Because you don't have to install the software if you don't want to. I find that people that don't drive very often and I've never used any sort of driver assistance because they drive all the time don't want self-driving. I used to say why would I ever want self-driving. Now that I drive as much as I do I want it more than ever. Things change. Nice to have options.
I still don’t want it. I’m disappointed virtually no manual transmissions are made any more and then to take away the joy of driving is sad for many of us. You do you but I personally don’t see Scout going autonomous and based on the roughly 80,000 reservations and no mention of Autonomous to date I do t think the majority of Scout fans care. Many others have come on here fresh and jumped in on SM failing unless they went gas/ICE and that hasn’t changed yet either. Guess we will all wait and see.
Perhaps starting a thread for people to vote on here would help SM determine the majority interest
 
I still don’t want it. I’m disappointed virtually no manual transmissions are made any more and then to take away the joy of driving is sad for many of us. You do you but I personally don’t see Scout going autonomous and based on the roughly 80,000 reservations and no mention of Autonomous to date I do t think the majority of Scout fans care. Many others have come on here fresh and jumped in on SM failing unless they went gas/ICE and that hasn’t changed yet either. Guess we will all wait and see.
Perhaps starting a thread for people to vote on here would help SM determine the majority interest
I completely agree. I would not want a third party software in my Scout that had not been thoroughly tested by Scout. But again, just me and yes we will just have to wait and see.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nolen and J Alynn
Already lots of discussions on this if you do some searching. Scout is touted as a connection machine. It is about hands on. It’s about adventure. Maybe down the road but the established consensus is No self driving. It’s not what the overwhelming Scout community wants. It’s about the hands on experience. Just an FYI

But the forum is open so we will all have opinions unique to ourselves!
All I’m asking for is adaptive cruise control. The whole hands off self driving kind of spooks me.
 
Description on Internet for those who don’t know-I didn’t. I can live with this as most of it is enhanced safety which I have now.

Level 2+ autonomous driving represents an enhanced form of partial automation, building upon Level 2, where the system can handle more complex driving tasks, but the driver must remain alert and ready to take control. [1, 2]
Here's a more detailed breakdown: [1, 2]
  • Level 2+ vs. Level 2: While Level 2 systems can handle acceleration, braking, and steering in specific situations, Level 2+ systems offer a more advanced capability, allowing for more complex maneuvers and potentially longer periods of automated driving. [1, 2]
  • Driver's Role: Despite the increased automation, the driver remains responsible for monitoring the driving environment and is expected to be ready to intervene if necessary. [1, 2]
  • Examples of Level 2+ Capabilities: Some Level 2+ features include lane-change assistance, adaptive cruise control, and self-parking capabilities. [3]
  • "Hands-on, Eyes-off": Level 2+ systems are sometimes referred to as "hands-on, eyes-off" because the driver can relax their hands from the wheel while still being attentive to the road. [1]
  • Not Full Automation: It's important to note that Level 2+ is still a form of partial automation and does not represent full self-driving capabilities, which are found in Levels 3, 4, and 5. [2, 4, 5]
Generative AI is experimental.
[1] https://auto-sens.com/blog/the-capabilities-and-use-cases-of-level-2-level-2-cars-with-juergen-hoellisch/
[2] https://www.mapfreinsurance.com/blog/different-levels-of-autonomous-driving/
[3] https://www.carmagazine.co.uk/car-n...erent-driverless-technology-levels-explained/
[4] https://www.jdpower.com/cars/shopping-guides/levels-of-autonomous-driving-explained
[5] https://www.synopsys.com/blogs/chip-design/autonomous-driving-levels.html
Not all images can be exported from Search.
 
Description on Internet for those who don’t know-I didn’t. I can live with this as most of it is enhanced safety which I have now.

Level 2+ autonomous driving represents an enhanced form of partial automation, building upon Level 2, where the system can handle more complex driving tasks, but the driver must remain alert and ready to take control. [1, 2]
Here's a more detailed breakdown: [1, 2]
  • Level 2+ vs. Level 2: While Level 2 systems can handle acceleration, braking, and steering in specific situations, Level 2+ systems offer a more advanced capability, allowing for more complex maneuvers and potentially longer periods of automated driving. [1, 2]
  • Driver's Role: Despite the increased automation, the driver remains responsible for monitoring the driving environment and is expected to be ready to intervene if necessary. [1, 2]
  • Examples of Level 2+ Capabilities: Some Level 2+ features include lane-change assistance, adaptive cruise control, and self-parking capabilities. [3]
  • "Hands-on, Eyes-off": Level 2+ systems are sometimes referred to as "hands-on, eyes-off" because the driver can relax their hands from the wheel while still being attentive to the road. [1]
  • Not Full Automation: It's important to note that Level 2+ is still a form of partial automation and does not represent full self-driving capabilities, which are found in Levels 3, 4, and 5. [2, 4, 5]
Generative AI is experimental.
[1] https://auto-sens.com/blog/the-capabilities-and-use-cases-of-level-2-level-2-cars-with-juergen-hoellisch/
[2] https://www.mapfreinsurance.com/blog/different-levels-of-autonomous-driving/
[3] https://www.carmagazine.co.uk/car-n...erent-driverless-technology-levels-explained/
[4] https://www.jdpower.com/cars/shopping-guides/levels-of-autonomous-driving-explained
[5] https://www.synopsys.com/blogs/chip-design/autonomous-driving-levels.html
Not all images can be exported from Search.
Thanks!
 
I know that Chevy, Ford, and Ram (among a lot of other brands) have their own Hands Free Driving. I’ve seen some videos on it, and it’s interesting. The wife and I recently spent a week on San Juan Island, and getting there is a 550 mile drive and then an hour-ish ferry ride. Somewhere between Ritzville and Ellensburg, WA I started to wonder if the hands free driving would be nice? I guess it could reduce some fatigue, but if you’re still watching the road and paying attention, how much difference would it make versus hands on driving with the cruise set? I guess it would make opening a soda easier.

This is a video from Ram’s YouTube channel on how their system works. It’s kind of interesting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: THil08 and J Alynn
I still don’t want it. I’m disappointed virtually no manual transmissions are made any more and then to take away the joy of driving is sad for many of us. You do you but I personally don’t see Scout going autonomous and based on the roughly 80,000 reservations and no mention of Autonomous to date I do t think the majority of Scout fans care. Many others have come on here fresh and jumped in on SM failing unless they went gas/ICE and that hasn’t changed yet either. Guess we will all wait and see.
Perhaps starting a thread for people to vote on here would help SM determine the majority interest
Sounds like you should buy an original scout with a manual transmission. And a reservations mean nothing, just ask Tesla and Ford who only fulfilled 10% of those reservations. There are a lot of people like me who want a platform and expecting a manufacturer to do something that they say they're going to do. Creating a vehicle without the option of current and future technology is a death sentence. That's been proven by the current state of things. Like I said that's the beauty of open pilot. They can outfit their vehicles with the hardware which is inexpensive. And if you choose not to download the software that's entirely up to you and you can drive as much as you want. But it opens them up to getting other customers like me who want driving assistance. So are you saying that if they do something like that that you won't buy a scout because it has the capability of self-driving even if you don't have to use it?
 
I completely agree. I would not want a third party software in my Scout that had not been thoroughly tested by Scout. But again, just me and yes we will just have to wait and see.
They can test it. Open Pilot is only the second largest automated driving system in the world. And I will have their equipment and their open software in my truck monday. Once again in case you missed it you don't have to download the software. But having that capability and having camera systems built into run it would be great.
 
If I drove 6,000 miles a month like MicroBiom I would want self driving too. Thats a lot of miles. I don’t though, so it’s not a priority for me.
So if your vehicle came with the ability to do it if you decide to download software would that be a problem for you? I think it would be more of a problem if life circumstances changed and you found yourself having to drive a lot for some reason. And then you wanted it and didn't have the ability to do it. I mean I'm purchasing a comma 3x to run in my Ford F-150 hybrid that has driver assist but I don't want to grab the steering wheel all the time. That will allow me not to do that without having to pay a subscription fee.
 
We currently plan on Level II+ but let's see what happens over the next few years.
So that's essentially what Open Pilot is. But I believe it has the ability to go full self-driving because it's a living advancable software. It is only limited by what the vehicle is capable of as far as hardware. It would be great if you guys would look into integration with them. I think it would save you a lot of money, time and hassle trying to reinvent or duplicate the wheel. Future upgrades would be done as time progresses on their own. And just got motors VW or rivian wouldn't have to pay for the time and development of that. I think it is something to seriously consider. Just like using Android auto and apple carplay. Same principle. Why come up with your own navigation system when it's built in native on everyone's phones and that's what most people use anyway. I'd like to see Open Pilot, as well as scout motors integrate with Android auto or Apple carplay.
 
Last edited: