Some suggestions that I believe would make Scout the best Electric Offroad option

  • From all of us at Scout Motors, welcome to the Scout Community! We created this community to provide Scout vehicle owners, enthusiasts, and curiosity seekers with a place to engage in discussion, suggestions, stories, and connections. Supportive communities are sometimes hard to find, but we're determined to turn this into one.

    Additionally, Scout Motors wants to hear your feedback and speak directly to the rabid community of owners as unique as America. We'll use the Scout Community to deliver news and information on events and launch updates directly to the group. Although the start of production is anticipated in 2026, many new developments and milestones will occur in the interim. We plan to share them with you on this site and look for your feedback and suggestions.

    How will the Scout Community be run? Think of it this way: this place is your favorite local hangout. We want you to enjoy the atmosphere, talk to people who share similar interests, request and receive advice, and generally have an enjoyable time. The Scout Community should be a highlight of your day. We want you to tell stories, share photos, spread your knowledge, and tell us how Scout can deliver great products and experiences. Along the way, Scout Motors will share our journey to production with you.

    Scout is all about respect. We respect our heritage. We respect the land and outdoors. We respect each other. Every person should feel safe, included, and welcomed in the Scout Community. Being kind and courteous to the other forum members is non-negotiable. Friendly debates are welcomed and often produce great outcomes, but we don't want things to get too rowdy. Please take a moment to consider what you post, especially if you think it may insult others. We'll do our best to encourage friendly discourse and to keep the discussions flowing.

    So, welcome to the Scout Community! We encourage you to check back regularly as we plan to engage our members, share teasers, and participate in discussions. The world needs Scouts™. Let's get going.


    We are Scout Motors.

konnorrclark

Member
Feb 15, 2025
15
22
Utah
Like many of these forms, I am very excited for the soon-to-be-released Scout Traveler and Terra. I am also impressed to see that there is a suggestion page for the purpose of trying to add features to the vehicle before it enters production. I think what excites me most about the new Scout is the direction the company is heading and its founding ideology of being an all-American electric offroader. In furtherance of that idea, I feel the need to give some suggestions that I believe will help further Scout in that direction.
Firstly and this may be my only issue with the new Scout coming out is that it has a solid rear axle and independent suspension out front. Having both a Rubicon and a 1978 Scout II my favorite feature of both vehicles is the solid front axle due to its reliability having larger tires on there and its offroading/rock crawling capabilities. I do understand that many individuals who are looking to buy a Scout care more about ride quality than off-road capability and that Scout has already developed both vehicles with independent front suspension in mind. With that being said I would definitely be willing to pay extra to have a solid axle for the front as an option. For Scout, I believe it would help capture some market away from the Jeep brand due to their lack of an electric vehicle in this market and for those who are not bothered by this, they do not have to pay extra for what is already promised. I also believe that this would fit the entire culture Scout is trying to create by allowing future owners to create their own Scout and allow a level of offroad customization that no other brand offers.
Second with Volkswagen’s current investment with QuantumScape and solid-state batteries seemingly being right around the corner for the company I would hope that there is a plan to either integrate them into the lineup if they are released before the first Scouts hit the road or an option to upgrade to them after such as a battery swap. I think the amazing potential that solid-state batteries have for electric vehicles, especially Scouts, has to be factored into near-future plans for the brand. Greater longevity, lighter weight, better charging, and better energy dynamics among many other bonuses would turn Scouts into the ultimate silent offroaders/overlander vehicles giving them much longer rangers before adding a Harvester to them if one is even deemed necessary. I have already reserved a Scout Traveler but I hope that if a solid-state battery option becomes available I will be able to add it or upgrade to it later.
Third, look to Rivian and do not copy Rivian. Rivian is an amazing company and their current/future lineup of vehicles is awesome but I believe that someone who would buy a Scout and someone who would buy a Rivian are similar yet very different. I think their many unique storage features are a highlight of the vehicle along with their ability to self-level and the R2’s completely flat folding seats. These are features I would like to have in a Scout, I already know it is likely planned to have a self-level feature but the completely flat seats I have yet to see. I noticed in a video that the Traveler had some sort of sliding rack system similar to what may be seen on the floor of a cargo jet for securing payloads. I think that would be an awesome feature that Scout aftermarket could take advantage of. I think it would be cool if the seats could fold flat and there would be a bed attachment I could hook in the back with a sliding galley kitchen turning my Traveler into a small camper while I hit the trails. It appears that this is already the direction with auto leveling seen in one of the videos explaining the UI and a satellite wifi panel (amazing idea). What I do worry though is that many are asking that more features be included from a Rivian that I do not think fits the model of the Scout. Many in previous comments have talked about including more tech for on-road driving or more features designed for a better road-use experience. I think adding all of these would be a mistake because it would likely drive up costs, turn Scout into a direct competitor with Rivian which should not be the case, and take away from off-road options that I believe fit the brand better. I think Scout should be the Audi to Rivian’s Porsche. What I mean by this is that they both develop similar vehicles but at different price points to a different crowd. If people truly desire all of those features found on better road-going cars go buy a Rivian they are awesome but what I am looking for is a serious offroader that will beat Jeep to the punch on offering a fully electric rock crawling machine.
Smaller features that may be a cool addition but aren’t a massive deal to me include the addition of red lights to both the interior and exterior of the vehicle. For the interior they would be used to read maps or move about the vehicle without ruining your natural night vision and on the exterior they would only be used while the vehicle is parked and in a sort of camp mode so it does not disturb others at the campsite. I also think the addition of removable top panels similar to the front ones found on a Jeep or Bronco would be cool as well.
In conclusion, I am very excited about the new Scout and I am very happy that I made a reservation for one. I think this community is going to be amazing and I think the revival of the Scout brand and its current direction is going to be one of the greatest success stories in the EV era. I hope that some of these suggestions are considered and I wish all the best as they develop this new brand! Thank you!
 
Upvote 0
Welcome and thanks for the good thoughts. Based on the feedback over the past two years, the intent is for the Scout to be a multi-tool and serve all masters. The reality is the serious off-road buyer segment is a very small group of buyers. While it seems like there are a lot of off roaders here it is because the enthusiasts have found the forum and are ahead of the crowds. There has been a significant increase in reservations since CES which is mainly the tech crowd. There is also a large group of buyers wanting the vehicle because of the EV aspect and again, “extreme” off road features won’t appeal to them.
I have fond memories of my first vehicle being a Scout but I have no intention of off roading. My parents never did either but it was the family car and we did a lot of trips which hold memories. I am interested because of the heritage, the 35+ year desire to own another Scout and the flexibility of the Scout being a multi-tool. That said I have no interest in a Rivian as it is way too tech heavy for my wants/needs and the nostalgia of the Scout means different things to different people-but means a lot to me.
The bulk of buyers will spend 80% or more of their time on the pavement so that needs to be factored in. The majority of buyers in general will buy this for looks and the “dream” of the off road adventure but never do so. If the ride quality ends up equal to or worse then a Jeep then SM risks losing a significant buyer pool. At $60K to start it will price out a lot of younger people-then significant upgrades like front solid axles would raise the price significantly. Realizing you are willing to pay for a front solid axle as an option is great but at what extra cost does the take rate become too minimal to make it worth while along with reworking additional parts and electrical architecture?
I think red lights are a simple idea that could benefit those that need them or an easy aftermarket option. SM has commented and suggestions have been made for perimeter lighting. Having camped and worked in a campground I believe a soft light would be more effective for after dark set up with ability for red swap if folks like yourself are interested. Soft light would be beneficial for other activities as well. The roof options have been nailed down to date as solid metal, fixed giant pano or the operable cabana roof. Removable front panels will not be in the mix.
 
Totally understandable that's why I wish a solid front axle would be an option. Also tons of people who do not off road still buy jeeps regardless of the front axle. Regarding younger individuals affording the vehicle I do think you'll be surprised at how many young people who can afford it will want it. I am in my 20s and me and all of my buddies are very excited for this thing. In today's age this is priced similar to a Tacoma. I appreciate the comment and in put!
 
Like many of these forms, I am very excited for the soon-to-be-released Scout Traveler and Terra. I am also impressed to see that there is a suggestion page for the purpose of trying to add features to the vehicle before it enters production. I think what excites me most about the new Scout is the direction the company is heading and its founding ideology of being an all-American electric offroader. In furtherance of that idea, I feel the need to give some suggestions that I believe will help further Scout in that direction.
Firstly and this may be my only issue with the new Scout coming out is that it has a solid rear axle and independent suspension out front. Having both a Rubicon and a 1978 Scout II my favorite feature of both vehicles is the solid front axle due to its reliability having larger tires on there and its offroading/rock crawling capabilities. I do understand that many individuals who are looking to buy a Scout care more about ride quality than off-road capability and that Scout has already developed both vehicles with independent front suspension in mind. With that being said I would definitely be willing to pay extra to have a solid axle for the front as an option. For Scout, I believe it would help capture some market away from the Jeep brand due to their lack of an electric vehicle in this market and for those who are not bothered by this, they do not have to pay extra for what is already promised. I also believe that this would fit the entire culture Scout is trying to create by allowing future owners to create their own Scout and allow a level of offroad customization that no other brand offers.
Second with Volkswagen’s current investment with QuantumScape and solid-state batteries seemingly being right around the corner for the company I would hope that there is a plan to either integrate them into the lineup if they are released before the first Scouts hit the road or an option to upgrade to them after such as a battery swap. I think the amazing potential that solid-state batteries have for electric vehicles, especially Scouts, has to be factored into near-future plans for the brand. Greater longevity, lighter weight, better charging, and better energy dynamics among many other bonuses would turn Scouts into the ultimate silent offroaders/overlander vehicles giving them much longer rangers before adding a Harvester to them if one is even deemed necessary. I have already reserved a Scout Traveler but I hope that if a solid-state battery option becomes available I will be able to add it or upgrade to it later.
Third, look to Rivian and do not copy Rivian. Rivian is an amazing company and their current/future lineup of vehicles is awesome but I believe that someone who would buy a Scout and someone who would buy a Rivian are similar yet very different. I think their many unique storage features are a highlight of the vehicle along with their ability to self-level and the R2’s completely flat folding seats. These are features I would like to have in a Scout, I already know it is likely planned to have a self-level feature but the completely flat seats I have yet to see. I noticed in a video that the Traveler had some sort of sliding rack system similar to what may be seen on the floor of a cargo jet for securing payloads. I think that would be an awesome feature that Scout aftermarket could take advantage of. I think it would be cool if the seats could fold flat and there would be a bed attachment I could hook in the back with a sliding galley kitchen turning my Traveler into a small camper while I hit the trails. It appears that this is already the direction with auto leveling seen in one of the videos explaining the UI and a satellite wifi panel (amazing idea). What I do worry though is that many are asking that more features be included from a Rivian that I do not think fits the model of the Scout. Many in previous comments have talked about including more tech for on-road driving or more features designed for a better road-use experience. I think adding all of these would be a mistake because it would likely drive up costs, turn Scout into a direct competitor with Rivian which should not be the case, and take away from off-road options that I believe fit the brand better. I think Scout should be the Audi to Rivian’s Porsche. What I mean by this is that they both develop similar vehicles but at different price points to a different crowd. If people truly desire all of those features found on better road-going cars go buy a Rivian they are awesome but what I am looking for is a serious offroader that will beat Jeep to the punch on offering a fully electric rock crawling machine.
Smaller features that may be a cool addition but aren’t a massive deal to me include the addition of red lights to both the interior and exterior of the vehicle. For the interior they would be used to read maps or move about the vehicle without ruining your natural night vision and on the exterior they would only be used while the vehicle is parked and in a sort of camp mode so it does not disturb others at the campsite. I also think the addition of removable top panels similar to the front ones found on a Jeep or Bronco would be cool as well.
In conclusion, I am very excited about the new Scout and I am very happy that I made a reservation for one. I think this community is going to be amazing and I think the revival of the Scout brand and its current direction is going to be one of the greatest success stories in the EV era. I hope that some of these suggestions are considered and I wish all the best as they develop this new brand! Thank you!
Also if we could up vote this so our discussions could be seen more that would be awesome! The more visibility to hear what options people want and reasons for owning a Scout I think would benefit everyone. I will also try to reply to everyone for a more fleshed out conversation. Thank you!
 
There are other threads with “what options would you want” that are multi pages long so some of those are set with upvotes so you may want to find those and throw in your critical “wants” so more people see them.
Just an FYI the SM teams look regularly if not daily at this forum/our threads so they will see your thoughts sooner or later ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: konnorrclark
There are other threads with “what options would you want” that are multi pages long so some of those are set with upvotes so you may want to find those and throw in your critical “wants” so more people see them.
Just an FYI the SM teams look regularly if not daily at this forum/our threads so they will see your thoughts sooner or later ?
That's good! I also appreciate you going through and commenting on stuff too!
 
  • Like
Reactions: J Alynn
The solid front axle on my and all other Wranglers is by far the strongest for off-road, trails and rock crawling. But the ride is rough and there are more moving/support parts. The Scout if I read the specs correctly is a foot wider than Wrangler. So it won't fit places Wranglers have and will go. My Arizona pinstripes would be mirror removing branches on Scout. Then the width on said axle would be holly batman wide and wide things hitting solid things tend to bend.

I maybe wrong but this Scout will never be the off-road Scout of the past. More of an Overlanding vehicle, coolest daily driver in 'Merica.
 
I agree! I don't think it would be wrangler level I just have a hard time fully trusting independent front suspension and I do think there are some trails it could hit just not to the same level as the Jeep is all. Again I would like it as an option not standard if that makes sense. Appreciate the comment!
 
The solid front axle on my and all other Wranglers is by far the strongest for off-road, trails and rock crawling. But the ride is rough and there are more moving/support parts. The Scout if I read the specs correctly is a foot wider than Wrangler. So it won't fit places Wranglers have and will go. My Arizona pinstripes would be mirror removing branches on Scout. Then the width on said axle would be holly batman wide and wide things hitting solid things tend to bend.

I maybe wrong but this Scout will never be the off-road Scout of the past. More of an Overlanding vehicle, coolest daily driver in 'Merica.
I read the Wrangler Rubicon's width as 73.9 in which is 6 inches less than a Traveler (the Scout's mirrors do widen it considerably to 91.6).
 
  • Like
Reactions: konnorrclark
Welcome to the forum, and thanks for your well thought-out post and suggestions!

As @J Alynn said, Scout is trying to walk a very fine line of making a capable off roader while still appealing to the masses for whom the bulk or all of their driving will be on road and would never need a solid front axle. That said, I do wonder how difficult/costly it would be for Scout to offer it as an option, maybe as part of an off road package. I imagine the bulk of cost would be the tooling and other changes to the assembly line to make that solid axle option possible, but I am not an expert in auto plant operations, so I could be wrong.

I definitely hear you though, having owned a 1976 Scout II, a 1974 Bronco with lift and 35s, and 1978 and 1979 Broncos. There's just nothing like a good solid front axle.
 
I agree I would like to point out though that tons of people who never off-road buy Wranglers regardless of the front axle.
That is true but majority of Wrangler buyers buy them as lifestyle vehicles-removable top, removable doors-beach goers, road warriors, off roaders alike. I’d guess the majority of Wrangler buyers don’t even consider the axle. That said-I know a ton of folks that have them and say they hate the stiff ride. Ford/Bronco learned from that and chose their direction in part because of that and look at how popular the Bronco has become. Central PA doesn’t exactly have tons of rock crawling opportunities and I see an incredible number of Broncos (formally owned one-briefly )with probably less than 1-2% of the vehicles looking like they are serious off-roaders.
The Scouts, like all “retro” /brick shaped SUVs are desirable due to the perceived lifestyle/nostalgia. And that’s how they will market them is for the “dreamers”. Sure-5%-10% (maybe) will be genuine enthusiasts users but the bulk will be every day drivers who love the nostalgia or the design or the “I got mine first” and just use it as a daily driver/family truckster with Clark behind the wheel.
 
The solid front axle on my and all other Wranglers is by far the strongest for off-road, trails and rock crawling. But the ride is rough and there are more moving/support parts. The Scout if I read the specs correctly is a foot wider than Wrangler. So it won't fit places Wranglers have and will go. My Arizona pinstripes would be mirror removing branches on Scout. Then the width on said axle would be holly batman wide and wide things hitting solid things tend to bend.

I maybe wrong but this Scout will never be the off-road Scout of the past. More of an Overlanding vehicle, coolest daily driver in

I agree I would like to point out though that tons of people who never off-road buy Wranglers regardless of the front axle.
My son calls my Wrangler my Pavement Princess. ?
 
Like many of these forms, I am very excited for the soon-to-be-released Scout Traveler and Terra. I am also impressed to see that there is a suggestion page for the purpose of trying to add features to the vehicle before it enters production. I think what excites me most about the new Scout is the direction the company is heading and its founding ideology of being an all-American electric offroader. In furtherance of that idea, I feel the need to give some suggestions that I believe will help further Scout in that direction.
Firstly and this may be my only issue with the new Scout coming out is that it has a solid rear axle and independent suspension out front. Having both a Rubicon and a 1978 Scout II my favorite feature of both vehicles is the solid front axle due to its reliability having larger tires on there and its offroading/rock crawling capabilities. I do understand that many individuals who are looking to buy a Scout care more about ride quality than off-road capability and that Scout has already developed both vehicles with independent front suspension in mind. With that being said I would definitely be willing to pay extra to have a solid axle for the front as an option. For Scout, I believe it would help capture some market away from the Jeep brand due to their lack of an electric vehicle in this market and for those who are not bothered by this, they do not have to pay extra for what is already promised. I also believe that this would fit the entire culture Scout is trying to create by allowing future owners to create their own Scout and allow a level of offroad customization that no other brand offers.
Second with Volkswagen’s current investment with QuantumScape and solid-state batteries seemingly being right around the corner for the company I would hope that there is a plan to either integrate them into the lineup if they are released before the first Scouts hit the road or an option to upgrade to them after such as a battery swap. I think the amazing potential that solid-state batteries have for electric vehicles, especially Scouts, has to be factored into near-future plans for the brand. Greater longevity, lighter weight, better charging, and better energy dynamics among many other bonuses would turn Scouts into the ultimate silent offroaders/overlander vehicles giving them much longer rangers before adding a Harvester to them if one is even deemed necessary. I have already reserved a Scout Traveler but I hope that if a solid-state battery option becomes available I will be able to add it or upgrade to it later.
Third, look to Rivian and do not copy Rivian. Rivian is an amazing company and their current/future lineup of vehicles is awesome but I believe that someone who would buy a Scout and someone who would buy a Rivian are similar yet very different. I think their many unique storage features are a highlight of the vehicle along with their ability to self-level and the R2’s completely flat folding seats. These are features I would like to have in a Scout, I already know it is likely planned to have a self-level feature but the completely flat seats I have yet to see. I noticed in a video that the Traveler had some sort of sliding rack system similar to what may be seen on the floor of a cargo jet for securing payloads. I think that would be an awesome feature that Scout aftermarket could take advantage of. I think it would be cool if the seats could fold flat and there would be a bed attachment I could hook in the back with a sliding galley kitchen turning my Traveler into a small camper while I hit the trails. It appears that this is already the direction with auto leveling seen in one of the videos explaining the UI and a satellite wifi panel (amazing idea). What I do worry though is that many are asking that more features be included from a Rivian that I do not think fits the model of the Scout. Many in previous comments have talked about including more tech for on-road driving or more features designed for a better road-use experience. I think adding all of these would be a mistake because it would likely drive up costs, turn Scout into a direct competitor with Rivian which should not be the case, and take away from off-road options that I believe fit the brand better. I think Scout should be the Audi to Rivian’s Porsche. What I mean by this is that they both develop similar vehicles but at different price points to a different crowd. If people truly desire all of those features found on better road-going cars go buy a Rivian they are awesome but what I am looking for is a serious offroader that will beat Jeep to the punch on offering a fully electric rock crawling machine.
Smaller features that may be a cool addition but aren’t a massive deal to me include the addition of red lights to both the interior and exterior of the vehicle. For the interior they would be used to read maps or move about the vehicle without ruining your natural night vision and on the exterior they would only be used while the vehicle is parked and in a sort of camp mode so it does not disturb others at the campsite. I also think the addition of removable top panels similar to the front ones found on a Jeep or Bronco would be cool as well.
In conclusion, I am very excited about the new Scout and I am very happy that I made a reservation for one. I think this community is going to be amazing and I think the revival of the Scout brand and its current direction is going to be one of the greatest success stories in the EV era. I hope that some of these suggestions are considered and I wish all the best as they develop this new brand! Thank you!
Solid state batteries would be ideal. Between their QuantumScape investment and talks with Blue Solutions we can hope. Sadly I don't think either option hit a production state by the time these start delivering but we could get lucky. I completely agree with keeping complex on road features that would increase weight or decrease reliability out of the picture and stay true to the target market for the vehicle. I read somewhere they are actually focusing on manufacturing to allow for easier wrenching on your own car which I think is fantastic. I'm do worry, however, about some fool going beyond the intent and trying to work on something they shouldn't....then ending up a pile of ash on the driveway with Scout being sued. Talk about good intentions gone wrong.
 
That is true but majority of Wrangler buyers buy them as lifestyle vehicles-removable top, removable doors-beach goers, road warriors, off roaders alike. I’d guess the majority of Wrangler buyers don’t even consider the axle. That said-I know a ton of folks that have them and say they hate the stiff ride. Ford/Bronco learned from that and chose their direction in part because of that and look at how popular the Bronco has become. Central PA doesn’t exactly have tons of rock crawling opportunities and I see an incredible number of Broncos (formally owned one-briefly )with probably less than 1-2% of the vehicles looking like they are serious off-roaders.
The Scouts, like all “retro” /brick shaped SUVs are desirable due to the perceived lifestyle/nostalgia. And that’s how they will market them is for the “dreamers”. Sure-5%-10% (maybe) will be genuine enthusiasts users but the bulk will be every day drivers who love the nostalgia or the design or the “I got mine first” and just use it as a daily driver/family truckster with Clark behind the wheel.
True I think the Bronco crushed that and has a good market share because of it. I don't think it is a one or the other type of situation I just think that having the option for a solid front axle would fill one hole and if there are extra on the lot I guess you could say many people probably wouldn't bother. Maybe a better example are those who buy 3/4 and full ton trucks to get groceries and never pull anything. Along with solid axle I am really interested if there are any plans to integrate solid state batteries when they become avaliable. IDK what everyone else thinks.
 
Solid state batteries would be ideal. Between their QuantumScape investment and talks with Blue Solutions we can hope. Sadly I don't think either option hit a production state by the time these start delivering but we could get lucky. I completely agree with keeping complex on road features that would increase weight or decrease reliability out of the picture and stay true to the target market for the vehicle. I read somewhere they are actually focusing on manufacturing to allow for easier wrenching on your own car which I think is fantastic. I'm do worry, however, about some fool going beyond the intent and trying to work on something they shouldn't....then ending up a pile of ash on the driveway with Scout being sued. Talk about good intentions gone wrong.
100%! I think that is where only 80% is able to be self serviced. If there was a plan with Solid-state batteries projected I would opt for the EV only with the intention to change it out for a Solid-state one. As of now optioned the harvester because of range and towing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: N Wilson