Scout Concepts are coming home April 18-20, 2026

  • From all of us at Scout Motors, welcome to the Scout Community! We created this community to provide Scout vehicle owners, enthusiasts, and curiosity seekers with a place to engage in discussion, suggestions, stories, and connections. Supportive communities are sometimes hard to find, but we're determined to turn this into one.

    Additionally, Scout Motors wants to hear your feedback and speak directly to the rabid community of owners as unique as America. We'll use the Scout Community to deliver news and information on events and launch updates directly to the group. Although the start of production is anticipated in 2026, many new developments and milestones will occur in the interim. We plan to share them with you on this site and look for your feedback and suggestions.

    How will the Scout Community be run? Think of it this way: this place is your favorite local hangout. We want you to enjoy the atmosphere, talk to people who share similar interests, request and receive advice, and generally have an enjoyable time. The Scout Community should be a highlight of your day. We want you to tell stories, share photos, spread your knowledge, and tell us how Scout can deliver great products and experiences. Along the way, Scout Motors will share our journey to production with you.

    Scout is all about respect. We respect our heritage. We respect the land and outdoors. We respect each other. Every person should feel safe, included, and welcomed in the Scout Community. Being kind and courteous to the other forum members is non-negotiable. Friendly debates are welcomed and often produce great outcomes, but we don't want things to get too rowdy. Please take a moment to consider what you post, especially if you think it may insult others. We'll do our best to encourage friendly discourse and to keep the discussions flowing.

    So, welcome to the Scout Community! We encourage you to check back regularly as we plan to engage our members, share teasers, and participate in discussions. The world needs Scouts™. Let's get going.


    We are Scout Motors.
Yeah, that’s the Traveler with the Harvester button clicked.

The following is all speculation…

That fully-boxed frame is going to be a monster. My bet is that the suspension is also going to be massive. Just look at the relative size of the strut mounts.

With a suspension that robust, the extra weight of the Harvester genset aft of the rear axle may not cause much deflection in the front suspension, which means it may not impact tongue weight enough to greatly change overall towing capacity. But I bet it’ll feel more like driving an F-250 or F-350 than a Lexus SUV, especially when there’s no load. This makes me wonder if the BEV models will have slightly softer spring rates on the coilovers in the rear. If not, BEV rear passengers could be in for a bumpy ride.

The fully-boxed frame rails at the rear suggest less upfitter flexibility than I had hoped. We’ll see if that will be true of the Terra as well. It would be nice to have the rails under the bed be open C-channel, at least for the Terra.
Controlling that much rear unsprung weight is going to a challenge regardless. Assuming a ~300lb-350lb genset on the Harvester, I don't know that the sprung weight will be too different than the EV model, but with that weight in radically different locations, I expect the stability control and such will need to be programmed very differently. The Harvester Traveler might be a handful without electronic nannies on gravel roads with a lot of unsprung weight and so much weight hanging off the rear. Hopefully she's fun to drift without snap oversteer!

Unrelated, but there appears to be an empty tray or space between the rear axle and Harvester. With the gas tank between the rear axle and the battery, I'm curious what's going in this space. Inverter/battery control? Cooling/radiator?
 
  • Like
Reactions: maynard
Did anyone capture all of the training station signs like this one? I really wished I had those to look at now. This one is a zoomed in clip and unreadable. @nolen had posted earlier about the learning exercise here. If I recall right, the simulated liquid paint solution was a mixture of water and glycerin and maybe some other stuff. I thought these signs may describe the training process details.

Training Signs.JPG
 
  • Like
Reactions: maynard and cyure
Controlling that much rear unsprung weight is going to a challenge regardless. Assuming a ~300lb-350lb genset on the Harvester, I don't know that the sprung weight will be too different than the EV model, but with that weight in radically different locations, I expect the stability control and such will need to be programmed very differently. The Harvester Traveler might be a handful without electronic nannies on gravel roads with a lot of unsprung weight and so much weight hanging off the rear. Hopefully she's fun to drift without snap oversteer!

Most of the weight we see here will be sprung. I think you understand this, but just so other readers get it too: The frame and everything directly bolted to the frame (including the body, etc) is sprung weight. It’s the struts, solid axles, wheels, tires, etc. that are unsprung. Unsprung weight contributes to ride harshness, difficulty in controlling the vehicle, and etc. Usually sprung weight isn’t a major contributor to those kinds of issues, but with the Harvester genset aft of the rear axle, this adds a lot of extra weight outside of the usual center of gravity, so the stability control software will need to be specially programmed to manage that extra weight. Think of the tail wagging the dog kind of analogy.

I agree, with the radically different weight distribution, it definitely will require different traction/stability control algorithms. The “unsafe at any speed” report from decades ago was about a scenario similar to this (rear drive with most of the weight in the rear). The Scouts will be benefitting from decades of science and engineering improvements.

Unrelated, but there appears to be an empty tray or space between the rear axle and Harvester. With the gas tank between the rear axle and the battery, I'm curious what's going in this space. Inverter/battery control? Cooling/radiator?

I saw that too. I keep trying to rotate the 3D model to get a better view.
My guess is that it’s where the converter/inverter will sit.

Also notice the size of the battery doesn’t fully fit into the frame. I wonder if Scout will offer the BEV with the smaller battery as a lower-cost option. If so, is that the “less than $60k” purchase option and the larger battery will boost the BEV starting price up to $70k or so?
 
Most of the weight we see here will be sprung. I think you understand this, but just so other readers get it too: The frame and everything directly bolted to the frame (including the body, etc) is sprung weight. It’s the struts, solid axles, wheels, tires, etc. that are unsprung. Unsprung weight contributes to ride harshness, difficulty in controlling the vehicle, and etc. Usually sprung weight isn’t a major contributor to those kinds of issues, but with the Harvester genset aft of the rear axle, this adds a lot of extra weight outside of the usual center of gravity, so the stability control software will need to be specially programmed to manage that extra weight. Think of the tail wagging the dog kind of analogy.

I agree, with the radically different weight distribution, it definitely will require different traction/stability control algorithms. The “unsafe at any speed” report from decades ago was about a scenario similar to this (rear drive with most of the weight in the rear). The Scouts will be benefitting from decades of science and engineering improvements.
I'm mostly concerned with the weight of the motor, gears, etc integrated into the solid rear axle. A Ford 9"/Dana 60 isn't light by any means, and motors have come a long way in recent years, so hopefully I'll be surprised.
 
This one is easy: 43 minutes :ROFLMAO: (using the timestamps on some of my photos)

There were about 8 demonstration stations and each about 5 minutes long (OK someone is doing the math already and that is only 40 minutes...but we did have travel time between stations and some wait periods between ;))
Not the best photos, but it may give some idea of the tour.

View attachment 15190View attachment 15191

Typically each station would have employees demonstrating the learning activities.
View attachment 15192View attachment 15195
pxl_20260420_211130058-jpg.15193
View attachment 15196

Ahhh PLCs, now you’re talking my language!
 
  • Like
Reactions: bwdavis7
Pretty sure that's the Traveler, nothing else has a setup like this. I stole this from you, but I'm really hoping I don't get rear-ended with the Harvester. Also, those rear frame rails look really beefy, so hopefully the towing rating has improved.

View attachment 15222
Looks Beefy that's a real SUV. not this monocoque/unibodies.
 
I'm mostly concerned with the weight of the motor, gears, etc integrated into the solid rear axle. A Ford 9"/Dana 60 isn't light by any means, and motors have come a long way in recent years, so hopefully I'll be surprised.
The American Axle and Manufacturing (now Dauch) claim is that their ebeam solid axle is 25% less massive than whatever they consider the competition…

I don’t know what that means.
 
The American Axle and Manufacturing (now Dauch) claim is that their ebeam solid axle is 25% less massive than whatever they consider the competition…

I don’t know what that means.
Any chance you've got a link? I haven't seen that and can't find it in relation to their beam axle.
 
  • Like
Reactions: J Alynn