Welcome to the community. This has been asked in the past and there is no indication that this is on the table at this point.Is there a possibility that you could offer a diesel version of the scout has anybody asked or is it even on the design table?
Maybe look for a restored Scout II diesel? I had owned an '80 and it was a great truck! Still miss it and that's partly why I'm here (and waiting)...Hello there and welcome to the community. I guess I would start with, Why? Are you wanting a diesel-only model or to use a diesel engine for the generator in the Harvester model? Diesels are quite heavy, you don't need high torque to spin a generator, they take a long time to warm up (and reach efficient operation), to comply with current regulations they need complicated, expensive, and heavy DEF tanks, DPFs, etc., plus diesel fuel is much more expensive.
If you want a diesel-only version, I am sorry but Scout has only committed to building BEV and EREV models at this point. There are lots of options out there for ICE trucks and SUVs - Scout would be competing in a VERY crowded field.
You still have the weight, DEF, and cost problem. If you're worried about the Apocalypse, get the BEV version. It is WAY easier to make your own electricity than your own hydrocarbons (and DEF, although that is basically urea which is fairly easy to makeI was totally just thinking about a Diesel version of the Harvester. Most sailboats use diesel engines for motorized propulsion, and I was thinking how beneficial it would be after the Apocalypse to be able to run my Scout Traveler w/Harvester off of biodiesel rather than needing to constantly be on the hunt for rapidly declining supplies of gasoline.
That was more or less stated at the reveal event. Diesel is a no go with VWAGIt seems unlikely we'll see another small diesel in the USA from a VW Group Company. The legacy of Dieselgate looms large. Light-duty diesels are essentially dead here. It's only GM's 3L Duramax. Europeans are abandoning diesel cars for hybrids and EV's.
Just had to get rid of my 2018 diesel f150 to avoid the wet-belt changes and a turbo replacement (over 10k repair), I don’t see any diesel in my future…I generally like diesels - in the right situations I think they are superior. That said, they don't shoe horn into all situations. The main problem I see is VW will not be making any diesels for the US market till hell freezes over. FWIW I like my VW diesel.
I have had not diesel related problems with it. Have had no diesel related problems with my F250. My wife's Jeep diesel might becoming a different issue. It had a $3k problem 6 months ago - and now is waiting for a second shop trip to figure out if it has a new $5k diesel problem. I don't think my wife drives it hard enough. Diesel in a grocery getter can have issues. My truck tows, my VW does long trips. Short hops are not good for diesel systems.
FWIW, I have lost count how many people have told us to delete it. But I am not going to incriminate myself on a forum by saying weather or not we are considering that. But apparently, deleting can solve some potential issues.
This is a solved problem. Chevy worked it all out with the Volt back in the day. The car will automatically run the engine periodically to keep everything exercised and lubricated. I would avoid ethanol fuel and if you're really worried you can toss some Stabil into the tank when you fill up. That will keep fuel good for years.One advantage of diesel is the fuel longevity. Not that I think diesel is realistic for the scout or even something I would personally want, but one of the silly thoughts rattling around the back of my head is,
“if I get a harvester model, and I don’t happen to use gas for 6 months (because I’m good about plugging in), would I just drive around the block to use up old gasoline?”
Are they green with Jim Carrey’s voice?<SNIP>
Also, with diesel, you have to worry about humbugs (yes, they are a real thing) and need to treat the fuel with biobor to prevent growth (we do the same w/ jet fuel).
Hmm. Maybe. They have a test for them! Maybe someone could put them under a microscope.Are they green with Jim Carrey’s voice?
It seems unlikely we'll see another small diesel in the USA from a VW Group Company. The legacy of Dieselgate looms large. Light-duty diesels are essentially dead here. It's only GM's 3L Duramax. Europeans are abandoning diesel cars for hybrids and EV's.
Thank you for your reply…. I agree…. It would be too costly with the emissions standards and I believe there’s a potential with the diesel being a failure point for an upstart vehicle that wants to succeed at a high level not to say that VW couldn’t build a substantial diesel engine, but I think there’s some liabilities there that shouldn’t be in a new startup vehicle company maybe in the next couple generations a diesel harvester model might be pretty cool as running at a constant speed would be very efficient for the diesel, but I think there has to be long-term studies and engineering done to make it be a top performance optionHello there and welcome to the community. I guess I would start with, Why? Are you wanting a diesel-only model or to use a diesel engine for the generator in the Harvester model? Diesels are quite heavy, you don't need high torque to spin a generator, they take a long time to warm up (and reach efficient operation), to comply with current regulations they need complicated, expensive, and heavy DEF tanks, DPFs, etc., plus diesel fuel is much more expensive.
If you want a diesel-only version, I am sorry but Scout has only committed to building BEV and EREV models at this point. There are lots of options out there for ICE trucks and SUVs - Scout would be competing in a VERY crowded field.