Extra, Extra....Read All About It!

  • From all of us at Scout Motors, welcome to the Scout Community! We created this community to provide Scout vehicle owners, enthusiasts, and curiosity seekers with a place to engage in discussion, suggestions, stories, and connections. Supportive communities are sometimes hard to find, but we're determined to turn this into one.

    Additionally, Scout Motors wants to hear your feedback and speak directly to the rabid community of owners as unique as America. We'll use the Scout Community to deliver news and information on events and launch updates directly to the group. Although the start of production is anticipated in 2026, many new developments and milestones will occur in the interim. We plan to share them with you on this site and look for your feedback and suggestions.

    How will the Scout Community be run? Think of it this way: this place is your favorite local hangout. We want you to enjoy the atmosphere, talk to people who share similar interests, request and receive advice, and generally have an enjoyable time. The Scout Community should be a highlight of your day. We want you to tell stories, share photos, spread your knowledge, and tell us how Scout can deliver great products and experiences. Along the way, Scout Motors will share our journey to production with you.

    Scout is all about respect. We respect our heritage. We respect the land and outdoors. We respect each other. Every person should feel safe, included, and welcomed in the Scout Community. Being kind and courteous to the other forum members is non-negotiable. Friendly debates are welcomed and often produce great outcomes, but we don't want things to get too rowdy. Please take a moment to consider what you post, especially if you think it may insult others. We'll do our best to encourage friendly discourse and to keep the discussions flowing.

    So, welcome to the Scout Community! We encourage you to check back regularly as we plan to engage our members, share teasers, and participate in discussions. The world needs Scouts™. Let's get going.


    We are Scout Motors.
https://reotrucks.com/

Has anyone heard of this company? Looks like they are planning a $21k truck.
Aside from the old REO Speedwagon and old REO trucks, can't say that I have. Simple, gas-powered small trucks. Wonder if they've got legit funding.

Edit: Seems Volvo ended up with the REO rights, which means Geely basically has them, so a cheap Chinese vehicle, assembled from Chinese parts in Texas? Maybe I'm connecting the dots wrong.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: J Alynn
Aside from the old REO Speedwagon and old REO trucks, can't say that I have. Simple, gas-powered small trucks. Wonder if they've got legit funding.

Edit: Seems Volvo ended up with the REO rights, which means Geely basically has them, so a cheap Chinese vehicle, assembled from Chinese parts in Texas? Maybe I'm connecting the dots wrong.
Huh didn’t know they were owned by Volvo Group. They kept saying reliable engines but there is no mention of the engine they use
 
Jeep Recon pricing and mileage is official.

Only a single trim (Moab). 33in tires, 9.1in of ground clearance, 100kwh battery, 28min 5-80% charge time.

$67k, and 222 mile range.


I'm sort of amazed how it can get only 9.1in of ground clearance with 33in tires. Subaru wilderness models have more, with smaller tires. And my Hyundai Tucson has 8.3in of ground clearance with zero offroad intentions/tire selections whatsoever.

Plus that efficiency is pretty brutal. I imagine the highway range will be... short.
Wow, the mileage is dismal. If nothing else it makes a Scout that much more desirable unless you must have removable parts (I tried harder this time with my grammar)
 
  • Like
Reactions: maynard and cyure
Jeep Recon pricing and mileage is official.

Only a single trim (Moab). 33in tires, 9.1in of ground clearance, 100kwh battery, 28min 5-80% charge time.

$67k, and 222 mile range.


I'm sort of amazed how it can get only 9.1in of ground clearance with 33in tires. Subaru wilderness models have more, with smaller tires. And my Hyundai Tucson has 8.3in of ground clearance with zero offroad intentions/tire selections whatsoever.

Plus that efficiency is pretty brutal. I imagine the highway range will be... short.
It won't sell and somehow Stellantis will find a way for it to be the consumer's fault. We weren't ready for it, or we had range anxiety, or some such bs. They'll never look inward and say we designed a fugly vehicle with below average range and then charged too much money for it.

Sad to see.
 
Is it like thinning the herd????
They used to teach "look both ways" and now they teach "pedestrians have the right of way"...

Federal law mandated better rollover ratings for occupants, but to achieve this, the vehicle pillars need to be larger. You know what happens when you make A-pillars 10"+ thick?? You can't see crap in front of you approaching from the sides, including vehicles, pedestrians, cyclists, etc.

Like most government mandates, there are unintended consequences.
 
They used to teach "look both ways" and now they teach "pedestrians have the right of way"...

Federal law mandated better rollover ratings for occupants, but to achieve this, the vehicle pillars need to be larger. You know what happens when you make A-pillars 10"+ thick?? You can't see crap in front of you approaching from the sides, including vehicles, pedestrians, cyclists, etc.

Like most government mandates, there are unintended consequences.
And we all know Nobody stares down at their phones when crossing roads. I’d be curious how much is related to cell use and poor habits of pedestrians not paying attention-not that anyone deserves to be/get hit but I bet there’s a correlation for sure. But yeah-monster thick pillars add a lot of blindspots.
 
  • Like
Reactions: maynard
And we all know Nobody stares down at their phones when crossing roads. I’d be curious how much is related to cell use and poor habits of pedestrians not paying attention-not that anyone deserves to be/get hit but I bet there’s a correlation for sure. But yeah-monster thick pillars add a lot of blindspots.
There were so many college kids jaywalking in town near the college they ramped up giving them tickets because so many of them were getting hurt. They got cranky but too bad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: J Alynn and maynard
Pedestrians are the reason pop-up headlights and wedgy front ends went away. Car makers have come up with interesting solutions for pedestrian safety. For instance, the Lexus LC500 has explosive charges under the hood. In the event of a pedestrian collision, the charges detonate, lifting the hood up and reducing injury.
 
  • Like
Reactions: THil08
https://reotrucks.com/

Has anyone heard of this company? Looks like they are planning a $21k truck.
I wonder if that’s the company I heard about today that’s putting pressure on SLATE.

But also that’s all gas, and it has a massive 25 gallon tank. So you will spend the same amount in gas with in 6 ish years of ownership roughly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: J Alynn and maynard
They need something that costs $50K right now. Their cars are just too expensive.
I also think the Gravity looks too close to a minivan for anyone to get excited about. I think the Air looks nice - but to your point very expensive for a sedan. Especially when you can get the high-end Tesla Model 3 for ~$15k less than the base Air (not to mention legacy OEM offerings). I haven't compared them to see how different the features are, but $15k is a big hole to start with.
 
Is it like thinning the herd????
Mentioning the herd, maybe these trucks will have to be equipped with cow kickers to throw the pedestrians to the side instead of the smash and run over maneuver
Guns trucks don’t kill people, people kill people.
I stand by my many earlier statements that modern trucks are way too big. I’ll even double down on that with a punitive statement. Just how EVs are starting to incur extra fees from our fine elected governments, anyone driving a 3/4- 1 ton truck for personal use should have to pay an extra fee. They do just as much road damage as EVs and pollute 100% more. And for those about to roast me as woke I run a fleet of diesel trucks and own a Jeep Comanche.
 
I also think the Gravity looks too close to a minivan for anyone to get excited about. I think the Air looks nice - but to your point very expensive for a sedan. Especially when you can get the high-end Tesla Model 3 for ~$15k less than the base Air (not to mention legacy OEM offerings). I haven't compared them to see how different the features are, but $15k is a big hole to start with.
I love the air but honestly the difference between that and a Porsche panamera-if you aren’t in love with EV there are other choices for sure. We probably have 5 to 6 airs in my vicinity and I look everyone I see one. They are sharp looking but so pricey
I think if Scout can hold close to $60K and offer a lot in the package it’s going to be very compelling but in this economy a 4-seat sedan for basically $80K is a pricey proposition