True-I’m sure that falls into the play bookPlus those dealers want ICE engines that break down so they can make all that service center money.
True-I’m sure that falls into the play bookPlus those dealers want ICE engines that break down so they can make all that service center money.
They do and they don't. They actually make more money on the car sales and warranty than an engine having a problem or needing an oil change. Labor rates are so high which is good for us mechanics, but the dealers don't make as much.Plus those dealers want ICE engines that break down so they can make all that service center money.
Speaking with my corporate hat on. I would not want to be in this situation if I was Scout. Besides the overhead (cost and effort) of hiring auditors and publishing audited financials every quarter. Scout would have to be very transparent on sales, cash flow etc, which is going to invite an exceptional amount of scrutiny. Additionally VW would need to sell a majority of the business via the IPO. The easier path would just be to privately sell a controlling interest to a 3rd party. Neither route ideal for Scout.Interesting read
![]()
Handelsblatt: VW considering Scout Motors IPO | Automotive World
A listing could give Scout a degree of distance from Volkswagen's dealer network, offering cover for its direct-to-consumer model. By Stewart Burnettwww.automotiveworld.com
Nope. Tesla tried this back in the day in order to comply with a CARB mandate. The problem comes down to who owns the battery pack. If I buy the battery pack with the car, then I want my battery pack back when I finish my trip. I don't want someone else's battery that the may have abused. So the stations then need to hang onto the original pack and the driver has to make sure to come back the same way and swap at the same station in order to get their pack back. It becomes a logistical nightmare.Nio swapped one million EV batteries in a week. It takes less than five minutes to swap. You can choose a larger battery for when you're towing or going on a long trip. Will we ever see that here?
Do we have any info on what that "Scout Supply Power Station" does? I desperately want a 240V outlet on the Traveler. I understand the space concerns for the outlet so I am fine with it being on some kind of umbilical cord or breakout box. I'm hoping that Power Station could be some kind of breakout box?
To me it’s the shape of a USB cord to charge your phone. Ha!Do we have any info on what that "Scout Supply Power Station" does? I desperately want a 240V outlet on the Traveler. I understand the space concerns for the outlet so I am fine with it being on some kind of umbilical cord or breakout box. I'm hoping that Power Station could be some kind of breakout box?
Have to agree with you. Troubled me when I read itSpeaking with my corporate hat on. I would not want to be in this situation if I was Scout. Besides the overhead (cost and effort) of hiring auditors and publishing audited financials every quarter. Scout would have to be very transparent on sales, cash flow etc, which is going to invite an exceptional amount of scrutiny. Additionally VW would need to sell a majority of the business via the IPO. The easier path would just be to privately sell a controlling interest to a 3rd party. Neither route ideal for Scout.
My fear there is now you have potential for additional board members and it suddenly becomes about profit and earnings vs the original ethos of SM
I'll second that comment, one of the things I have really enjoyed about this revival is it's link to heritage and community, once big wigs get involved that ethos may change.My fear there is now you have potential for additional board members and it suddenly becomes about profit and earnings vs the original ethos of SM
I'll third it. One of the things I've been impressed with the most so far is how close the team at SM is to the community and much interaction there is with us. They are really listening It's similar with Rivian but nowhere near as strong.I'll second that comment, one of the things I have really enjoyed about this revival is it's link to heritage and community, once big wigs get involved that ethos may change.
My fear there is now you have potential for additional board members and it suddenly becomes about profit and earnings vs the original ethos of SM
I think the difference between private investors and an IPO is that the responsibility (or rather the perception of the responsibility) seems to change from building a fantastic product to meeting public investor demands of profitability by the quarter.From the first day, we've pursued additional investors. Scott was just reiterating what we've been doing for a while.
Definitely not a fan of the profit-over-everything mentality that's taken over the stock market in recent decades.I think the difference between private investors and an IPO is that the responsibility (or rather the perception of the responsibility) seems to change from building a fantastic product to meeting public investor demands of profitability by the quarter.
How do us forum members contact investor relations?From the first day, we've pursued additional investors. Scott was just reiterating what we've been doing for a while.