Google Gemini AI Scout Images

  • From all of us at Scout Motors, welcome to the Scout Community! We created this community to provide Scout vehicle owners, enthusiasts, and curiosity seekers with a place to engage in discussion, suggestions, stories, and connections. Supportive communities are sometimes hard to find, but we're determined to turn this into one.

    Additionally, Scout Motors wants to hear your feedback and speak directly to the rabid community of owners as unique as America. We'll use the Scout Community to deliver news and information on events and launch updates directly to the group. Although the start of production is anticipated in 2026, many new developments and milestones will occur in the interim. We plan to share them with you on this site and look for your feedback and suggestions.

    How will the Scout Community be run? Think of it this way: this place is your favorite local hangout. We want you to enjoy the atmosphere, talk to people who share similar interests, request and receive advice, and generally have an enjoyable time. The Scout Community should be a highlight of your day. We want you to tell stories, share photos, spread your knowledge, and tell us how Scout can deliver great products and experiences. Along the way, Scout Motors will share our journey to production with you.

    Scout is all about respect. We respect our heritage. We respect the land and outdoors. We respect each other. Every person should feel safe, included, and welcomed in the Scout Community. Being kind and courteous to the other forum members is non-negotiable. Friendly debates are welcomed and often produce great outcomes, but we don't want things to get too rowdy. Please take a moment to consider what you post, especially if you think it may insult others. We'll do our best to encourage friendly discourse and to keep the discussions flowing.

    So, welcome to the Scout Community! We encourage you to check back regularly as we plan to engage our members, share teasers, and participate in discussions. The world needs Scouts™. Let's get going.


    We are Scout Motors.
I asked for soft gold. Not bad.

IMG_0745.png
 
So I’ve been screwing around the past week trying to take some of our flat CaD elevations and converting them to render images based on the style in which I sketch. Using it to refine AI support as well as see what other things it creates. It hasn’t been successful yet but I was playing more tonight and decided-WTH-let’s add a scout into the render. I’ve attached the sketches I used and what it generated. Again I’m realizing it won’t create exact but what it does render give us new ideas for designs. I loaded a couple traveler images but didn’t attach. Was kinda cool seeing the outcome
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0260.png
    IMG_0260.png
    3 MB · Views: 37
  • IMG_0224.jpeg
    IMG_0224.jpeg
    1.9 MB · Views: 32
  • IMG_0234.jpeg
    IMG_0234.jpeg
    1.8 MB · Views: 31
  • IMG_0237.jpeg
    IMG_0237.jpeg
    4.3 MB · Views: 33
  • IMG_0238.jpeg
    IMG_0238.jpeg
    3.2 MB · Views: 31
Just ran another using sketches only but added a Scout. Gemini is crazy. Three sketches and told it to make a street scape adding people and pedestrians Can’t believe what it pulled together in 45 seconds
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0236.jpeg
    IMG_0236.jpeg
    2.1 MB · Views: 30
  • IMG_0235.jpeg
    IMG_0235.jpeg
    2.2 MB · Views: 31
  • IMG_0233.jpeg
    IMG_0233.jpeg
    2.3 MB · Views: 36
  • IMG_0262.png
    IMG_0262.png
    3.3 MB · Views: 38
Fun little off road trailer with matching livery of the spirit of ‘26

View attachment 17343
Your sir are an AI artist! Seeing the Traveler without tire carrier inspired me to consider whether removing accessories would make the vehicle feel smaller. Many of the people in this group who have seen the traveler in person, myself included, have come away with the impression that it is a quite a large vehicle. I can't help but wonder if that impresion is overly influenced by the 35's, tall roof rack, and the tire carrier. Would a Traveler on 33's without the carrier and rack give a different impression? I'd love to know. The rack adds 4-5 inches in height (or more?). The carrier adds about 20" in length and the 35's play their part in height as well. The width is what is it of course. I'm curious if I'm the only one potentially interested in decontenting the vehicle for a smaller feel? My primary use case is off-road and 33's with 11" of ground clearance are more that enough for the trails in the Mountain West (OnX Offroad up to a 7 trail rating) that I frequent. I'm not interested in damaging my Traveler with anything more aggressive. The locker should be standard and I'm hoping for a sway bar disconnect option that is not tied to an expensive offroad package. Same with rock rails and armor options of course. Are others here thinking along these lines or is everyone here "Go big or go home!" :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: maynard
Your sir are an AI artist! Seeing the Traveler without tire carrier inspired me to consider whether removing accessories would make the vehicle feel smaller. Many of the people in this group who have seen the traveler in person, myself included, have come away with the impression that it is a quite a large vehicle. I can't help but wonder if that impresion is overly influenced by the 35's, tall roof rack, and the tire carrier. Would a Traveler on 33's without the carrier and rack give a different impression? I'd love to know. The rack adds 4-5 inches in height (or more?). The carrier adds about 20" in length and the 35's play their part in height as well. The width is what is it of course. I'm curious if I'm the only one potentially interested in decontenting the vehicle for a smaller feel? My primary use case is off-road and 33's with 11" of ground clearance are more that enough for the trails in the Mountain West (OnX Offroad up to a 7 trail rating) that I frequent. I'm not interested in damaging my Traveler with anything more aggressive. The locker should be standard and I'm hoping for a sway bar disconnect option that is not tied to an expensive offroad package. Same with rock rails and armor options of course. Are others here thinking along these lines or is everyone here "Go big or go home!" :)
I love the tire carrier, I’m getting it regardless. However, I really want to see the Traveler on an 18” with 33s.

In addition to the tire, the concepts we have seen are on a “off road setup” so that’s making them taller as well.

When I was at Nats I measured with the rack and without and when I was in Chicago I verified the rails make the Traveler the same height as with the rack.

IMG_6072.jpeg
IMG_6073.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: maynard
To be fair, from my POV I don’t think it’s that big. Visually I think it looks big but I think that is due to the design proportions. That said, we’ve had 3-row SUVs up until a few months ago for probably pushing 16 years so to me it doesn’t seem big but that’s what I’m comparing it against. If anything the height is what gets me the most but it makes the proportions of rest of traveler feel really good
 
To be fair, from my POV I don’t think it’s that big. Visually I think it looks big but I think that is due to the design proportions. That said, we’ve had 3-row SUVs up until a few months ago for probably pushing 16 years so to me it doesn’t seem big but that’s what I’m comparing it against. If anything the height is what gets me the most but it makes the proportions of rest of traveler feel really good
I thought it was much wider than my Wrangler, but it really isn’t. I measured at the widest point of my Wrangker, the tire. Because I have an offset wheel the Traveler is only about 1-1/2 inches wider. I still say the Traveler looks wider because it doesn’t have a thinner body/hood with a fender flare.
 
  • Like
Reactions: maynard
I thought it was much wider than my Wrangler, but it really isn’t. I measured at the widest point of my Wrangker, the tire. Because I have an offset wheel the Traveler is only about 1-1/2 inches wider. I still say the Traveler looks wider because it doesn’t have a thinner body/hood with a fender flare.
Completely agree. And ironically I don’t think Wranglers look or feel wide. I really think a lot of it is the proportions that visually make it look bigger. Granted, it’s no Geo Tracker or Suzuki Jimney but I think it at or just below a Yukon-IMO. And I think size-wise that’s correct as well based on dimensions. I think the rear carrier makes it bigger for sure but certainly don’t need that to start. Like @cyure i want the carrier because it’s how I’ve seen it every time but to each their own as far as how they use it
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: maynard and cyure