Will harvester models be "maintenance free" like their EV siblings?

  • From all of us at Scout Motors, welcome to the Scout Community! We created this community to provide Scout vehicle owners, enthusiasts, and curiosity seekers with a place to engage in discussion, suggestions, stories, and connections. Supportive communities are sometimes hard to find, but we're determined to turn this into one.

    Additionally, Scout Motors wants to hear your feedback and speak directly to the rabid community of owners as unique as America. We'll use the Scout Community to deliver news and information on events and launch updates directly to the group. Although the start of production is anticipated in 2026, many new developments and milestones will occur in the interim. We plan to share them with you on this site and look for your feedback and suggestions.

    How will the Scout Community be run? Think of it this way: this place is your favorite local hangout. We want you to enjoy the atmosphere, talk to people who share similar interests, request and receive advice, and generally have an enjoyable time. The Scout Community should be a highlight of your day. We want you to tell stories, share photos, spread your knowledge, and tell us how Scout can deliver great products and experiences. Along the way, Scout Motors will share our journey to production with you.

    Scout is all about respect. We respect our heritage. We respect the land and outdoors. We respect each other. Every person should feel safe, included, and welcomed in the Scout Community. Being kind and courteous to the other forum members is non-negotiable. Friendly debates are welcomed and often produce great outcomes, but we don't want things to get too rowdy. Please take a moment to consider what you post, especially if you think it may insult others. We'll do our best to encourage friendly discourse and to keep the discussions flowing.

    So, welcome to the Scout Community! We encourage you to check back regularly as we plan to engage our members, share teasers, and participate in discussions. The world needs Scouts™. Let's get going.


    We are Scout Motors.
I think the real question will be how fast you put hours on the engine. I seriously doubt it will go over 200hrs between services, and honestly since it will always be running at load 100hrs is probably more likely. But if you are plugging it in every night, you could probably easily get a year on that 100hrs (so an annual service). At 160 miles of battery range, you could easily get about 3hrs of driving a day without needing to run the engine. Even with running the range extender, you would have an "extended" range of 5k or so miles per year. Other than extended road trips with only overnight charging - that would stretch a long way.
 
Last edited:
The maintenance schedule will be similar to every other hybrid. The closest examples will be the BMW i3 REX or the BYD Shark, which have 7.5k/6 mo to 10k/12 mo intervals. The two 4-cylinder engines built by VW in their Silao, Mexico plant, one of which may the source for the Harvester have 10k/12mo maintenance intervals.
 
Honestly, the maintenance might actually be a reason for me to get the Harvester. I like to tinker and wrench, it's why I'll still have an ICE car to play with. For my daily, I would prefer something that requires less maintenance, 0 would be great but I live in the real world where everything breaks eventually. Besides, doing some maintenance connects me to the vehicle and gives confidence that it will perform properly. Tires, brakes and fluids will still need to be checked. A yearly checkup to the engine should be a a low cost and schedulable event. Maybe one day we can get to the point of home DIYers swapping out batteries and changing contactors and that will be the new maintenance, but that is a looong way off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: THil08
Honestly, the maintenance might actually be a reason for me to get the Harvester. I like to tinker and wrench, it's why I'll still have an ICE car to play with. For my daily, I would prefer something that requires less maintenance, 0 would be great but I live in the real world where everything breaks eventually. Besides, doing some maintenance connects me to the vehicle and gives confidence that it will perform properly. Tires, brakes and fluids will still need to be checked. A yearly checkup to the engine should be a a low cost and schedulable event. Maybe one day we can get to the point of home DIYers swapping out batteries and changing contactors and that will be the new maintenance, but that is a looong way off.
Okay I have a question. With this being an EREV the Harvester engine is going to be underneath not in the hood/frunk. Has that info been considered in your calculation? And do you mean the big battery or the 12v battery?
 
  • Like
Reactions: J Alynn
Honestly, the maintenance might actually be a reason for me to get the Harvester. I like to tinker and wrench, it's why I'll still have an ICE car to play with. For my daily, I would prefer something that requires less maintenance, 0 would be great but I live in the real world where everything breaks eventually. Besides, doing some maintenance connects me to the vehicle and gives confidence that it will perform properly. Tires, brakes and fluids will still need to be checked. A yearly checkup to the engine should be a a low cost and schedulable event. Maybe one day we can get to the point of home DIYers swapping out batteries and changing contactors and that will be the new maintenance, but that is a looong way off.
There are already home DIYers doing a battery swap from standard range to extended range on the Lightning.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyure
Totally, but everything is subject to what we finally get. My current understanding is that the Harvester module, unit, pack, whatever it ends up being will be under the bed of the truck, which is what I am interested in and have been looking at. It could have terrible access in which case I will rethink things (a different company more than likely as it will say more about what Scout is than this one thing). And yes, I mean the big battery. 12v batteries generally last about 5 years these days and the last time I had to replace one, I told the Autozone guy to just let me handle it please. He seemed nice enough but didn't exude confidence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyure
Yeah. I haven’t been following everyone's progress. An extended range battery from a Lightning on eBay can run between $2500 to $8500. A Mustang extended range battery can be as little as $1200.
Is anything else needed in the Lightning to do that conversion in terms of the additional weight/size of the extended range or is it just take out the one and replace with the other?
 
Is anything else needed in the Lightning to do that conversion in terms of the additional weight/size of the extended range or is it just take out the one and replace with the other?
The hardware is basically the same across the board. I would probably try to acquire the battery management module that came with the donor battery if possible, but not having that isn’t impossible to overcome.

There’s definitely some reprogramming required. That can be done by acquiring firmware from an otherwise identical truck and flashing it onto the recipient truck’s module(s).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chaz26
The hardware is basically the same across the board. I would probably try to acquire the battery management module that came with the donor battery if possible, but not having that isn’t impossible to overcome.

There’s definitely some reprogramming required. That can be done by acquiring firmware from an otherwise identical truck and flashing it onto the recipient truck’s module(s).
How much more range are people getting switching to a new battery?
 
How much more range are people getting switching to a new battery?
I haven’t seen completion reports yet. The standard range from the factory is 230 to 240 miles. The ER is 300-320 miles, depending on trim. So, assuming the conversion gives a similar range to what it would get from the factory, that’s up to 40% increase in range.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyure
Reading that article sounds a bit distressing but I hope it's just a little bit of sensationalism. The market is what it is and companies have to build to what the market wants. Sometimes figuring that out is a bit like reading tea leaves. I hope VW, and Scout by extension, have some good intelligence and can make the appropriate decisions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyure
@cyure posted that over in the news thread.

I think it’s speculation without evidence on the part of the author. We don’t have any information about what Scout Motors might decide w.r.t. releasing one before the other.

The author is mostly basing their speculation on what Stellantis did, but Stellantis has a disastrous C-Suite right now and is making wrong decision after wrong decision. They’re reactive to last year’s news and seem to have no forward-looking team members. I believe Scout is much more forward-looking. And while the uncertainty in the world right now is likely causing them some heartburn, they’re far more even keeled than Stellantis.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyure and R1TVT
@cyure posted that over in the news thread.

I think it’s speculation without evidence on the part of the author. We don’t have any information about what Scout Motors might decide w.r.t. releasing one before the other.

The author is mostly basing their speculation on what Stellantis did, but Stellantis has a disastrous C-Suite right now and is making wrong decision after wrong decision. They’re reactive to last year’s news and seem to have no forward-looking team members. I believe Scout is much more forward-looking. And while the uncertainty in the world right now is likely causing them some heartburn, they’re far more even keeled than Stellantis.
I’m very much hoping this is the case, and I totally understand producing what the market demands, so given reservations seem to overwhelmingly favor harvester it makes sense they would focus initial production there. I’m just really excited about my BEV Terra and as a day one reservation holder, I would feel very let down if they didn’t have at least some initial BEV production capacity, especially since that was the original design intent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyure
Has anyone heard anything about this:

Another thread has been discussing it-under the Extra, extra thread where most new-news articles get posted. No problem listing here but most the members land new articles there since we all look for them there. But thanks for posting it