Another teaser image to go along with our factory announcement... Oh, and did we mention that the new Scout will be body on ladder frame? Yes, it will be rugged... ?
With the same bolt pattern (and removable 18" section) as the Scout II? ?Another teaser image to go along with our factory announcement... Oh, and did we mention that the new Scout will be body on ladder frame? Yes, it will be rugged... ?
View attachment 807
Is that a panoramic sunroof? Removable roof less likelyAnother teaser image to go along with our factory announcement... Oh, and did we mention that the new Scout will be body on ladder frame? Yes, it will be rugged... ?
View attachment 807
Damn. LOVIN’ IT!!!Another teaser image to go along with our factory announcement... Oh, and did we mention that the new Scout will be body on ladder frame? Yes, it will be rugged... ?
View attachment 807
Damn. LOVIN’ IT!!!
Not bad at all. I like that the artist included vinyl graphicsFound these renders. Not bad.
what I noticed on this render as well as many others is the rear kink is too steep compared to the “originals” and while I like it, it leaves a ton of metal real estate that looks odd. A lower slope would provide more glass and probably less blind spot area. Maybe that area needs to be white as well to break up the mass of metal. Also realized the DRL’s feel a bit GMC to me but all-in-all it’s a great render. Wish they would have done a rear view tooNot bad at all. I like that the artist included vinyl graphics
I noticed the same thing - I thought the angle was wrong the first time I saw itwhat I noticed on this render as well as many others is the rear kink is too steep compared to the “originals” and while I like it, it leaves a ton of metal real estate that looks odd. A lower slope would provide more glass and probably less blind spot area. Maybe that area needs to be white as well to break up the mass of metal. Also realized the DRL’s feel a bit GMC to me but all-in-all it’s a great render. Wish they would have done a rear view too
More glass would be good. But, it could be easier to roll down if it’s smaller. ??what I noticed on this render as well as many others is the rear kink is too steep compared to the “originals” and while I like it, it leaves a ton of metal real estate that looks odd. A lower slope would provide more glass and probably less blind spot area. Maybe that area needs to be white as well to break up the mass of metal. Also realized the DRL’s feel a bit GMC to me but all-in-all it’s a great render. Wish they would have done a rear view too
Agreed on logo. Thought same thing. I just think a bit lower would feel better. The higher angle always reminds me of the Volvo xc90More glass would be good. But, it could be easier to roll down if it’s smaller. ??. If the metal area is that big, a logo placed there could break it up a little.
I’ll take that as a subtle indication that we will not see such an aggressive angle!?The angles you see for the C-pillar above in those renders is too aggressive.
I’ll take that as a subtle indication that we will not see such an aggressive angle!?
Glad to hear you say that ?The angles you see for the C-pillar above in those renders is too aggressive.
I am officially impressed! These look great?Another teaser image to go along with our factory announcement... Oh, and did we mention that the new Scout will be body on ladder frame? Yes, it will be rugged... ?
View attachment 807