Been curious what our demographics are on this forum from a buyer/user point of view. Maybe this will help Jamie and the team focus on where buyer interest levels are. Hopefully I covered enough angles.
Great added point of viewI want to expand on the idea behind "what kind of buyer are you"
I love cars and I also love the analysis that can come from associating what vehicle someone buys is a reflection of who they are and what they value as a person. Cars not only are the 2nd most expensive thing people buy, but many will spend more time in their cars than any individual room in their homes....so i find that the car you choose to buy is deeply personal.
price isn't always a factor in the analysis. as an example i was telling my friend about it and then i turned to his car a Honda HR-V. He then blurted out "you can tell i'm cheap". I replied that isn't necessarily the case. The HR-V has great gas mileage, it is practical, is has more passenger volume than cargo volume, and it is front wheel drive.....the other factor that i know from being his friend is that he is extremely frugal, he has enough money to buy more expensive cars but his main car is a early 2000s Nissan that still works fine. so because of that he HAD to spend money on his wife's car and the things he clearly found valuable enough to spend money on is his kids/family. Driving performance wasn't important to him and cargo space was a minor need for only occasional short road trips and no off roading.
the things i value as a person and therefore what i want in a vehicle:
- I value my family most of all so i want good comfortable passanger volume
- I want to work on my house, so i need cargo and towing
- I enjoy driving, finding the proper line and making a smooth transition in and out of curves, I used to enjoy stick shift but acceleration on demand is also something i value.
- I value nature so being able to drive down the beach or towing a small boat to a boat launch or just getting me a little down an unpaved road.
- I also really value efficiency. I don't like the idea of waste.....so MPG or MPGe is a very important comparison point for me.
just for reference 26 MPGe would be terrible....for reference the Rivian gets 74 MPGe and whats worse is the HUMMER EV which gets about 47MPGe and is considered a terribly inefficient vehicle...much like it's ICE version.-“fuel” economy matters but I don’t commute and I don’t expect a box on wheels to be stellar so hopefully Scout will blow my mind and average like 26-28 mpg-e.
Meant standard. Forgot to convert it upjust for reference 26 MPGe would be terrible....for reference the Rivian gets 74 MPGe and whats worse is the HUMMER EV which gets about 47MPGe and is considered a terribly inefficient vehicle...much like it's ICE version.
Feel like GMC going with 35” MTs as the only tire option was a PR mistake, it would have been wise to also offer a street focused/maximum MPGe tire option as well like Rivian did... particularly because of the Hummer’s history with efficiency or the lack thereof.just for reference 26 MPGe would be terrible....for reference the Rivian gets 74 MPGe and whats worse is the HUMMER EV which gets about 47MPGe and is considered a terribly inefficient vehicle...much like it's ICE version.
Will it let you pick more than 2?I am more than two of those options.
Only two.Will it let you pick more than 2?
And you are the perfect example of why I gave it a bump. Will help rebalance the demographics, or perhaps it won’t but you are an example that I think is becoming the norm for ScoutsI voted for the 2 that represent me the most and apparently I'm in the minority since both now have 2 votes total. Though I think the demographics on the site in 2023 were probably more long term Scout enthusiasts vs people who have come here because of design and capabilities.
Using me as an example, I have always loved the Scout, but I'm not interested in this vehicle based on anything to do with the history of the brand. I have also always loved the Bronco, but would not buy the current model on the looks alone. The new Scout design is just beautiful though and I have always been a person who needs to really like the looks of my vehicle. I am also not an EV enthusiast. Would I love my next vehicle to be an EV? Sure, but I'd still hold a reservation if the Scout had an engine rather than batteries.
What was that Billy Crystal character (maybe from SNL) that talked about the importance of looking good?"capable of towing" for me is local, short distances. I do intend to use my Scout as a utility vehicle but it has to look good while working hard. My outdoor adventures are primarily day hikes, not camping.
This?What was that Billy Crystal character (maybe from SNL) that talked about the importance of looking good?
![]()