Google Gemini AI Scout Images

[LastDayScout]

Your sir are an AI artist! Seeing the Traveler without tire carrier inspired me to consider whether removing accessories would make the vehicle feel smaller. Many of the people in this group who have seen the traveler in person, myself included, have come away with the impression that it is a quite a large vehicle. I can't help but wonder if that impresion is overly influenced by the 35's, tall roof rack, and the tire carrier. Would a Traveler on 33's without the carrier and rack give a different impression? I'd love to know. The rack adds 4-5 inches in height (or more?). The carrier adds about 20" in length and the 35's play their part in height as well. The width is what is it of course. I'm curious if I'm the only one potentially interested in decontenting the vehicle for a smaller feel? My primary use case is off-road and 33's with 11" of ground clearance are more that enough for the trails in the Mountain West (OnX Offroad up to a 7 trail rating) that I frequent. I'm not interested in damaging my Traveler with anything more aggressive. The locker should be standard and I'm hoping for a sway bar disconnect option that is not tied to an expensive offroad package. Same with rock rails and armor options of course. Are others here thinking along these lines or is everyone here "Go big or go home!"

I’m with you. I wish it were smaller. I have seen it and agree it’s big. I would not get a roof rack, or tire carrier. I would opt for all season tires.