Energy Required for 150 Miles of Range
Harvester Fuel Efficiency Metric (to deliver 60 kWh = 150 miles @ 2.5 mi/kWh)
Conclusion:
Higher output = shorter runtime = less total fuel = lower cost per kWh and per mile.
The 17.6 kW Harvester delivers ~36% lower cost per mile than a 6.0 kW unit.
Full Battery Recharge: 150 kWh @ 17.6 kW Output
Time to Full Charge:
150 ÷ 17.6 = 8.52 hours
Fuel Use (1.5 gal/hr):
8.52 × 1.5 = 12.78 gallons
Fuel Cost ($3.15/gal):
12.78 × 3.15 = $40.27
Cost per Mile (350 mi range):
$40.27 ÷ 350 = $0.115/mile
Why the Harvester Should Be a Full-Capability Generator and Mobile Charger
1. Vehicle Charging to Full Capacity
2. Mobile Generator Functionality for External Loads
3. Bidirectional Energy Design Enables V2H and V2V
4. Time and Energy Are Decoupled From Motion
Assumptions:
Scout has a unique opportunity to redefine what an electric vehicle can do by unlocking the full capability of its onboard generator. With 17.6 kW or greater output, the Harvester isn't just a tool for range extension, it’s a mobile energy platform capable of fully recharging the vehicle, powering external equipment, and supporting homes during outages. Enabling stationary operation allows this system to deliver energy where and when it’s needed most, operating efficiently under steady loads and independent of motion.
Once that core functionality is active, solar becomes a seamless complement. A 1 kW panel, such as a bed-mounted array, can contribute 10–20 miles of range per day, reducing fuel use and extending system flexibility. If Scout includes solar input connectors or a plug-in solar accessory that interfaces with the onboard charger, users could scale energy intake at camp or on worksites. This pairing turns the vehicle into a modular, resilient off-grid energy hub—more than just transportation.
- 150 miles ÷ 2.5 mi/kWh = 60 kWh
Charging Time to Deliver 60 kWh
Harvester Output | Time to Deliver 60 kWh | Range Added per Hour |
---|---|---|
6.0 kW | 10.0 hours | 15.0 miles/hour |
7.2 kW | 8.33 hours | 18.0 miles/hour |
9.6 kW | 6.25 hours | 24.0 miles/hour |
11.5 kW | 5.22 hours | 28.75 miles/hour |
17.6 kW | 3.41 hours | 44.0 miles/hour |
Fuel Cost Estimate (Gas @ $3.15/gal, 0.8 gal/hr consumption)
Output Power | Runtime | Fuel Used | Fuel Cost |
---|---|---|---|
6.0 kW | 10.0 hr | 8.0 gal | $25.20 |
9.6 kW | 6.25 hr | 5.0 gal | $15.75 |
11.5 kW | 5.22 hr | 4.2 gal | $13.23 |
17.6 kW | 3.41 hr | 2.7 gal | $8.51 |
Harvester Fuel Efficiency Metric (to deliver 60 kWh = 150 miles @ 2.5 mi/kWh)
Output (kW) | Time (hr) | Fuel Rate (gal/hr) | Fuel Used (gal) | Fuel Cost ($3.15/gal) | Cost per kWh | Cost per Mile |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6.0 | 10.00 | 0.8 | 8.00 | $25.20 | $0.42 | $0.168 |
9.6 | 6.25 | 1.0 | 6.25 | $19.69 | $0.33 | $0.131 |
11.5 | 5.22 | 1.2 | 6.26 | $19.73 | $0.33 | $0.132 |
17.6 | 3.41 | 1.5 | 5.11 | $16.11 | $0.27 | $0.107 |
Conclusion:
Higher output = shorter runtime = less total fuel = lower cost per kWh and per mile.
The 17.6 kW Harvester delivers ~36% lower cost per mile than a 6.0 kW unit.
Full Battery Recharge: 150 kWh @ 17.6 kW Output
Time to Full Charge:
150 ÷ 17.6 = 8.52 hours
Fuel Use (1.5 gal/hr):
8.52 × 1.5 = 12.78 gallons
Fuel Cost ($3.15/gal):
12.78 × 3.15 = $40.27
Cost per Mile (350 mi range):
$40.27 ÷ 350 = $0.115/mile
Why the Harvester Should Be a Full-Capability Generator and Mobile Charger
1. Vehicle Charging to Full Capacity
- With battery sizes in the 130–150 kWh range, topping off requires 8.5 hours at 17.6 kW
- That’s only achievable if the system operates while stationary
- Enables complete overnight recovery in remote or infrastructure-limited locations
2. Mobile Generator Functionality for External Loads
- 17.6 kW = enough to support homes during outages (fridge, HVAC, lighting, EV, internet)
- Essential for emergency preparedness, natural disasters, and grid interruptions
- Also powers job site equipment, trailers, and field systems where grid access is unavailable
3. Bidirectional Energy Design Enables V2H and V2V
- Leverage the battery and Harvester together to support home backup (V2H)
- Power other EVs or recharge Scout from external energy sources (V2V and true off-grid)
- Maximizes energy utility, not just vehicle propulsion
4. Time and Energy Are Decoupled From Motion
- Energy recovery and generator operation shouldn’t be limited to drive cycles
- Harvester should function independently of vehicle drivetrain status
Solar Assist: Supplemental Charging & Load Reduction
Assumptions:
- Solar panel output: 1.0 kW (e.g. Worksport Solis-style bed-mounted system)
- Sunlight availability: 4–6 hours/day of peak sun
- Vehicle efficiency: 2.5 mi/kWh
Daily Solar Contribution
- Energy generated:
1.0 kW × 4–6 hrs = 4–6 kWh/day - Range added:
4–6 kWh × 2.5 mi/kWh = 10–20 miles/day
Weekly Impact
- Energy: 28–42 kWh/week
- Range: 70–105 miles/week
- Fuel offset (Harvester @ 1.5 gal/hr):
- Time saved: 28–42 ÷ 17.6 = 1.6–2.4 hrs
- Fuel saved: 1.6–2.4 × 1.5 = 2.4–3.6 gallons/week
- Cost saved: 2.4–3.6 × $3.15 = $7.56–$11.34/week
Summary
- Solar adds 10–20 miles/day passively
- Reduces Harvester runtime and fuel use by 15–20%
- Improves system efficiency, especially during idle or low-demand periods
- Enables silent, fuel-free energy recovery when parked
Scout has a unique opportunity to redefine what an electric vehicle can do by unlocking the full capability of its onboard generator. With 17.6 kW or greater output, the Harvester isn't just a tool for range extension, it’s a mobile energy platform capable of fully recharging the vehicle, powering external equipment, and supporting homes during outages. Enabling stationary operation allows this system to deliver energy where and when it’s needed most, operating efficiently under steady loads and independent of motion.
Once that core functionality is active, solar becomes a seamless complement. A 1 kW panel, such as a bed-mounted array, can contribute 10–20 miles of range per day, reducing fuel use and extending system flexibility. If Scout includes solar input connectors or a plug-in solar accessory that interfaces with the onboard charger, users could scale energy intake at camp or on worksites. This pairing turns the vehicle into a modular, resilient off-grid energy hub—more than just transportation.
Last edited:
Upvote
0